Search

Objective Despite evidence-based guidelines stating that lipase alone should be used in the diagnosis of suspected acute pancreatitis, health care providers continue to order amylase or amylase and lipase together. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of appropriate laboratory testing related to the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Methods The study used a retrospective cross-sectional design. The timeframe was from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A retrospective chart review was used to collect data for the following: patient-provider encounter notes, patient demographics, provider demographics, differential and final diagnosis, and laboratory test results. Data analysis include stratification of categorical variables and calculation of cost savings. Results For the 12-month period, this study found 2567 (9.3%) of all amylase and lipase tests to be unnecessary. Amylase tests (1881; 73.2%) made up the most unnecessary tests followed by lipase tests (686; 26.7%). An analysis of test-ordering behavior by providers revealed that 81.5% of all unnecessary tests were ordered by MDs. Finally, this study estimated a total cost savings of $128,350 if all unnecessary tests were eliminated. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that amylase and lipase tests have been overutilized in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) is a fulminant fatal human disease caused by the free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri. Infection occurs after inhalation of water containing the amoeba, typically after swimming in bodies of warm freshwater. N. fowleri migrates to the brain where it incites meningoencephalitis and cerebral edema leading to death of the patient 7 to 10 days postinfection. Although the disease is rare, it is almost always fatal and believed to be underreported. The incidence of PAM in countries other than the United States is unclear and possibly on track to being an emerging disease. Poor prognosis is caused by rapid progression, suboptimal treatment, and underdiagnosis. As diagnosis is often performed postmortem and testing is only performed by a few laboratories, more accessible testing is necessary. This article reviews the current methods used in the screening and confirmation of PAM and makes recommendations for improved diagnostic practices and awareness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim of this study was to examine appropriate utilization of antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening tests with follow-up subserology tests (reflex testing) for diagnosing systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorder (SARD). Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 3003 SARD-test orders at an academic teaching hospital from January to December 2019. Testing patterns were categorized as American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-recommended reflex testing, panel testing, or single subserology testing. We described testing patterns, assessed their diagnostic accuracy, and explored factors associated with reflex testing. Results Reflex testing accounted for 79.7% of SARD test-ordering, whereas improper testing (panel or single subserology) accounted for the other 20.3%. Reflex testing was associated with significantly more SARD diagnoses than improper testing (P  = .004). Testing patterns were significantly associated with race/ethnicity (P  = .008), with reflex testing being less frequent than improper testing in Hispanics and Whites. Conclusion In summary, one-fifth (20.3%) of testing patterns for suspected SARD did not follow the ACR-recommended guidelines for using reflex testing. Use of reflex testing was associated with an increased frequency of SARD diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]