1. The impact of age on the validity of psychosis-risk screening in a sample of help-seeking youth
- Author
-
P.J. Rakhshan Rouhakhtar, Scott W. Woods, Caroline Demro, Nicole D. Andorko, Zachary B. Millman, Jason Schiffman, Peter Phalen, Samantha Redman, Gloria Reeves, Camille Wilson, Steven C. Pitts, and Barbara Walsh
- Subjects
Male ,Adolescent ,Psychosis risk ,Prodromal Symptoms ,Sample (statistics) ,Article ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Screening tool ,Young adult ,Child ,Biological Psychiatry ,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ,business.industry ,Early psychosis ,Age Factors ,Reproducibility of Results ,Patient Acceptance of Health Care ,Urban community ,Help-seeking ,Middle age ,030227 psychiatry ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Psychotic Disorders ,Female ,Self Report ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Self-report screening instruments offer promise in furthering early identification of at-risk youth, yet current efforts are limited by false positive rates. Identifying moderators of accuracy is a potential step towards improving identification and prevention efforts. We investigated the moderating effect of age on self-reported attenuated positive symptoms from the Prime Screen and clinician diagnosed clinical high-risk/early psychosis (CHR/EP) status. Participants (N = 134) were racially diverse, lower-income, help-seeking adolescents and young adults from a primarily urban community. The overall model predicting CHR/EP status was significant, with results suggesting the presence of a trending interaction between age and Prime Screen symptoms. Analyses indicated that number of items endorsed to predict CHR/EP decreased with age (youngest group [M = 12.99] cut off = 6 items; middle age group [M = 14.97] cut off = 3; oldest age group [M = 18.40] cut off = 1). Although younger participants endorsed more risk items on average, follow up analyses suggested that the Prime Screen was a more accurate predictor of clinician-diagnosed-risk among older participants relative to their younger peers. The current study builds on the literature identifying moderators of psychosis-risk screening measure accuracy, highlighting potential limitations of CHR/EP screening tools in younger populations.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF