Search

BackgroundProfessional community health workers (CHWs) can help achieve universal health coverage, although evidence gaps remain on how to optimise CHW service delivery. We conducted an unblinded, parallel, cluster randomised trial in rural Mali to determine whether proactive CHW delivery reduced mortality and improved access to health care among children under five years, compared to passive delivery. Here we report the secondary access endpoints.MethodsBeginning from 26-28 February 2017, 137 village-clusters were offered care by CHWs embedded in communities who were trained, paid, supervised, and integrated into a reinforced public-sector health system that did not charge user fees. Clusters were randomised (stratified on primary health centre catchment and distance) to care during CHWs during door-to-door home visits (intervention) or based at a fixed village site (control). We measured outcomes at baseline, 12-, 24-, and 36-month time points with surveys administered to all resident women aged 15-49 years. We used logistic regression with cluster-level random effects to estimate intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects over time on prompt (24-hour) treatment within the health sector.ResultsFollow-up surveys between February 2018 and April 2020 generated 20 105 child-year observations. Across arms, prompt health sector treatment more than doubled compared to baseline. At 12 months, children in intervention clusters had 22% higher odds of receiving prompt health sector treatment than those in control (cluster-specific adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06, 1.41, P = 0.005), or 4.7 percentage points higher (adjusted risk difference (aRD) = 0.047; 95% CI = 0.014, 0.080). We found no evidence of an effect at 24 or 36 months.ConclusionsCHW-led health system redesign likely drove the 2-fold increase in rapid child access to care. In this context, proactive home visits further improved early access during the first year but waned afterwards.RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02694055.

Background Rural parts of Mali carry a disproportionate burden of the country’s high under-five mortality rate. A range of household factors are associated with poor under-five health in resource-limited settings. However, it is unknown which most influence the under-five mortality rate in rural Mali. We aimed to describe household factors associated with under-five mortality in Bankass, a remote region in central Mali. Methods We analysed baseline household survey data from a trial being conducted in Bankass. The survey was administered to households between December 2016 and January 2017. Under-five deaths in the five years prior to baseline were documented along with detailed information on household factors and women’s birth histories. Factors associated with under-five mortality were analysed using Cox regression. Results Our study population comprised of 17,408 under-five children from 8322 households. In the five years prior to baseline, the under-five mortality rate was 152.6 per 1000 live births (158.8 and 146.0 per 1000 live births for males and females, respectively). Living a greater distance from a primary health center was associated with a higher probability of under-five mortality for both males (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.53 for ≥10 km versus Conclusions U5 mortality is very high in Bankass and is associated with living a greater distance from healthcare and several other household factors that may be amenable to intervention or facilitate program targeting.

Background Countries across sub-Saharan Africa are scaling up Community Health Worker (CHW) programmes, yet there remains little high-quality research assessing strategies for CHW supervision and performance improvement. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the effect of a personalised performance dashboard used as a supervision tool on the quantity, speed, and quality of CHW care. Methods We conducted a randomised controlled trial in a large health catchment area in peri-urban Mali. One hundred forty-eight CHWs conducting proactive case-finding home visits were randomly allocated to receive individual monthly supervision with or without the CHW Performance Dashboard from January to June 2016. Randomisation was stratified by CHW supervisor, level of CHW experience, and CHW baseline performance for monthly quantity of care (number of household visits). With regression analysis, we used a difference-in-difference model to estimate the effect of the intervention on monthly quantity, timeliness (percentage of children under five treated within 24 hours of symptom onset), and quality (percentage of children under five treated without protocol error) of care over a six-month post-intervention period relative to a three-month pre-intervention period. Results Use of the Dashboard during monthly supervision significantly increased the mean number of home visits by 39.94 visits per month (95% CI = 3.56-76.3; P = 0.031). Estimated effects on secondary outcomes of timeliness and quality were positive but not statistically significant. Across both study arms, CHW quantity, timeliness, and quality of care significantly improved over the study period, during which time all CHWs received dedicated monthly supervision, although effects plateaued over time. Conclusions Our findings suggest that dedicated monthly supervision and personalised feedback using performance dashboards can increase CHW productivity. Further operational research is needed to understand how to sustain the performance improvements over time. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03684551).