Search

Aims: To synthesize available data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical supervision practices of healthcare workers and students in healthcare settings. Design: A quantitative rapid review of the literature. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and Scopus for English language papers published between December 2019 (initial onset of the pandemic) to March 2021. Review methods: Using the World Health Organization and Cochrane guidelines for rapid reviews, following an identification of relevant papers and data extraction, a narrative synthesis approach was used to develop themes. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Four themes identified from data synthesis were nature and extent of disruptions to clinical supervision, unmet need for psychological support, supervisors also need support and unpacking telesupervision. Findings highlight the extent and nature of disruption to clinical supervision at the point of care. Further information on factors that facilitate high-quality telesupervision have come to light. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed tremendous burden on healthcare workers compromising their own health and well-being. It is essential to restore effective clinical supervision practices at the point of care, so as to enhance patient, healthcare worker and organizational outcomes into the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. Impact: This review has provided initial evidence on the adverse impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on clinical supervision of healthcare workers and students at the point of care. Available evidence indicates the urgent need to restore effective and high-quality clinical supervision practices in health settings. The review has highlighted a paucity of studies in this area, calling for further high-quality studies. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) programs to cancel or move online. There is no research about online CPE, and it is unknown how effective it is compared with in-person CPE. Researchers in other related fields have studied online clinical supervision, specifically how technology-assisted supervision affects the supervisory relationship, the development of supervisees' competence and confidence, supervisees' satisfaction, and the overall quality of clinical supervision. This paper presents a review of the scientific evidence about online clinical supervision. It is generally agreed that online clinical supervision is a viable alternative to in-person supervision. More research about online CPE is needed to develop best practices and new accreditation standards that enable CPE supervisors to practice online CPE at the highest level, whether in a pandemic or not.

The importance of clinical supervision, a professional support and clinical governance mechanism, to patients, healthcare workers and organizations has been well documented. Clinical supervision has been shown to support healthcare workers during challenging times, by reducing burnout, enhancing mental health and wellbeing at work, and improving job satisfaction. However, clinical supervision participation and effectiveness are pre-requisites for realising these benefits. During times of stress and increased workloads (e.g. during the Coronavirus pandemic), healthcare workers tend to prioritise clinical duties and responsibilities over clinical supervision. Effective supervision practices can be restored, and healthcare workers can be better supported in their roles during and in the post-pandemic period only if healthcare workers, policy makers, healthcare organizations, clinical supervision trainers and researchers join forces. This paper sheds light on this important topic and offers a number of practical recommendations to reboot effective clinical supervision practices at the point of care.

This paper addresses the need for a swift transition from in-person clinical supervision to telesupervision during the time of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Five specific areas will be discussed in the effort to enhance the quality of clinical supervision provided to couple and family therapists in training at this time including the following: (1) COVID-19 and the structural changes and technological adaptation of supervision; (2) culturally and contextually sensitive guidelines for clinical supervision during COVID-19; (3) the supervisee's competence and the clinical supervisory process; (4) the new set of boundaries and the supervisory role; (5) and the supervisory alliance and supervisees' vulnerabilities in the face of COVID-19.En este artículo se aborda la necesidad de una transición rápida de la supervisión clínica en persona a la telesupervisión durante el periodo de la pandemia mundial de la COVID-19. Se tratarán cinco áreas específicas con el fin de mejorar la calidad de la supervisión clínica ofrecida a los terapeutas de pareja y familiares en prácticas durante este periodo, por ejemplo: (1) La COVID-19 y los cambios estructurales y la adaptación tecnológica de la supervisión; (2) pautas que tienen en cuenta las particularidades culturales y contextuales para la supervisión clínica durante la COVID-19; (3) la competencia del supervisado y el proceso de supervisión clínica; (4) el nuevo conjunto de límites y el rol del supervisor; (5) y las vulnerabilidades de la alianza de supervisión y de los supervisados ante la COVID-19.本文讨论了在新型冠状病毒疫情期间，从现场面对面的临床督导方式迅速过渡到远程督导的必要性。为了提高伴侣治疗师和家庭治疗师在此期间接受培训的临床督导质量，本文将讨论5个具体方面: (1)新冠疫情和结构变化以及督导在技术方面做的调适; (2)新冠疫情期间临床督导所使用的对文化和背景敏感的指南; (3)接受督导者的实际能力和临床监督过程; (4)新的一套边界和监督作用; (5)监督联盟和接受督导者在新型冠状病毒肺炎面前的脆弱性。.