Search

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral vocal fold paralysis (VFP) is a severe complication after laryngotracheal (LT) surgery. The reduced glottic opening leads to significant respiratory distress immediately after the operation and requires the placement of a tracheostomy in most cases. Patients with a pre-existing unilateral VFP or expected recurrent nerve resection are at the highest risk for glottic failure. These patients might benefit from a pre-emptive glottic enlargement before LT surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received a pre-emptive glottis enlargement before LT surgery at the Medical University of Vienna from October 2011 to December 2016. Peri- and postoperative outcomes of this strategy were analysed. RESULTS: Six patients underwent preparatory glottic enlargement prior to LT resection. Four patients had recurrent thyroid cancer, and 1 patient had thymic cancer invading the cervical airway. The remaining patient had a complex benign glotto/subglottic stricture complicated by a pre-existing bilateral VFP. All patients received oblique cricotracheal resections extending into the larynx [resection length 39 ± 7mm (mean ± SD)]. Extubation within 24 h after surgery was achieved in 5 of 6 cases, although all patients had postoperative unilateral (n = 5) or bilateral (n = 1) VFP as anticipated. In 5 of the 6 patients, oral intake could be started immediately after the operation. The remaining patient regained full swallowing function after intensive swallowing rehabilitation. Postoperative voice quality was subjectively perceived as satisfactory by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive glottic enlargement is a valuable treatment strategy in patients at highest risk for postoperative bilateral VFP. It facilitates immediate postoperative extubation, despite at least unilateral VFP and extensive LT surgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with a repaired cleft palate, nasality is typically diagnosed by speech language pathologists. In addition, there are various instruments to objectively diagnose nasalance. To explore the potential of nasalance measurements after cleft palate repair by NasalView, we correlated perceptual nasality and instrumentally measured nasalance of eight speech items and determined the relationship between sensitivity and specificity of the nasalance measures by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analyses and AUC (area under the curve) computation for each single test item and specific item groups. We recruited patients with a primarily repaired cleft palate receiving speech therapy during follow-up. During a single day visit, perceptive and instrumental assessments were obtained in 36 patients and analyzed. The individual perceptual nasality was assigned to one of four categories; the corresponding instrumental nasalance measures for the eight specific speech items were expressed on a metric scale (1-100). With reference to the perceptual diagnoses, we observed 3 nasal and one oral test item with high sensitivity. However, the specificity of the nasality indicating measures was rather low. The four best speech items with the highest sensitivity provided scores ranging from 96.43 to 100%, while the averaged sensitivity of all eight items was below 90%. We conclude that perceptive evaluation of nasality remains state of the art. For clinical follow-up, instrumental nasalance assessment can objectively document subtle changes by analysis of four speech items only. Further studies are warranted to determine the applicability of instrumental nasalance measures in the clinical routine, using discriminative items only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]