Search

This article focuses on the root behavior of the characteristic function of some LTI SISO systems controlled by a PD‐control when a delay‐difference operator is used to approximate the derivative action. We will focus on the cases when the corresponding stability problem is improperly posed for "small" delay values. In this context, we will express the solutions of the corresponding characteristic function as power series and exploit their structure in deriving the asymptotic behavior of the characteristic roots. This analysis will allow detecting and explicitly characterizing the cases when delay‐difference approximations lead to improperly posed stability problems. Furthermore, in the case when the derivative approximation guarantees the properly posedness of the closed‐loop system, the robustness of the scheme with respect to the delay margin of the delay‐difference approximation and control gains parameters are explicitly addressed. More precisely, upper bounds on the delays as well as the robustness of the corresponding controller are computed. Some illustrative examples complete the presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the analysis of the stability properties of proportional-integralderivative (PID) controllers for dynamical systems with multiple state delays, focusing on the mathematical characterization of the potential sensitivity of stability with respect to infinitesimal parametric perturbations. These perturbations originate, for instance, from neglecting feedback delay, a finite-difference approximation of the derivative action, or neglecting fast dynamics. It is also shown that adding a low-pass filter, which might be necessary to reduce sensitivity to high-frequency noise, under certain conditions on the derivative feedback gain may destabilize the closed loop even for arbitrarily large cutoff frequencies. The analysis of these potential sensitivity problems leads us to the introduction of a "robustified" notion of stability called strong stability, inspired by the corresponding notion for neutral functional differential equations. We prove that strong stability can be achieved by adding a low-pass filter with a sufficiently large cutoff frequency to the control loop on the condition that the filter itself does not destabilize the nominal closed loop system. Throughout the paper, the theoretical results are illustrated by examples that can be analyzed analytically, including, among others, a third-order unstable system for which both proportional and derivative control action are necessary for achieving stability, while the regions in the gain parameter-space for stability and strong stability are not identical. Besides the analysis of strong stability, a computational procedure is provided for designing strongly stabilizing PID controllers. Computational case studies illustrating this design procedure complete the presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article addresses the boundary control problem of the transport equation. Namely, we propose a control method, which is merely a delayed output feedback relying on a partial pole placement idea, that consists in assigning an appropriate exponential decay rate to the closed‐loop system's solution. The proposed control structure appearing in the transport boundary, which has proven its effectiveness in controlling finite dimensional systems, consists of an autoregressive relation linking the transport equation's input and output. The obtained result provides an analytical lower bound for the solution's exponential decay. The contribution is concluded with a numeric discussion on the concrete implementation of the method with a special emphasis on the delay seen as a control parameter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: In this paper, we study the behavior of characteristic roots of a class of strictly proper LTI SISO systems that are subject to a PD controller for which the derivative action has been implemented by means of a delay‐difference approximation scheme that uses multiple delays. To such an end, the improperly‐posed case is discussed in depth, that is, the situations where "small delays" induce instability in the closed‐loop system. The effect of adding more delays on the improperly‐posed case is analyzed and a methodology for determining the set of parameters that produces such a situation for a given number of delays is derived. Some illustrative examples complete the presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work addresses the output feedback stabilisation problem for a class of linear single-input single-output systems subject to I/O network delays. More precisely, we are interested in the characterisation of the set of delay and gain parameters guaranteeing the stability of the closed-loop system. To perform such an analysis, we adopt aneigenvalue perturbationbased approach. Various illustrative numerical examples complete the presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: For linear systems with pointwise or distributed delay in the inputs which are stabilized through the reduction approach, we propose a new technique of construction of Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals. These functionals allow us to establish the ISS property of the closed-loop systems relative to additive disturbances. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The PID control is favored in controlling industrial processes for its ease of implementation. In this paper we present an analytical study, with an aim at stability robustness, tracking performance, and pole placement of first-order unstable plants under PID control. We employ a multiplicity-induced dominancy (MID) strategy to design and tune PID controller gains, which is shown to possess desirable properties that ensure specified decay rate of the closed-loop response and the stability robustness of the closed-loop system in spite of variations in the delay parameter. We also study the tradeoff between delay robustness and tracking performance of PID controllers. We show that under the constraint of steady-state tracking, the maximal delay robustness range can be computed by solving a unimodal pseudo-concave optimization problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]