Search

Background: Intrathecal administration of amphotericin B represents an important adjunctive therapy for management of severe fungal meningitis. Intrathecal preparations have traditionally used amphotericin B deoxycholate. Liposomal amphotericin B is an alternative formulation with good clinical outcomes as systemic therapy, but scant data exist investigating intrathecal use., Objective: The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate outcomes following intrathecal administration of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of severe fungal meningitis., Methods: A national shortage of amphotericin B deoxycholate necessitated revision of institutional protocols at a southwestern neurosurgical center in Spring 2023. A starting intrathecal daily dose of 0.125-0.5 mg liposomal amphotericin B was recommended (dependent on insertion device), with 0.125-0.25 mg slow titration every 48 h and up to a 2 mg maximum daily dose., Results: Four cases of fungal meningitis treated with adjunctive intrathecal amphotericin B liposomal formulation were reviewed. This included three cases of coccidioidal meningitis and one case of presumed Fusarium solani meningitis following an outbreak. All patients had initial disease improvement following initiation of intrathecal amphotericin B and were able to tolerate long-term therapy. One coccidioidal meningitis patient expired of neurologic complications shortly after being moved from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a floor unit. All other patients were successfully discharged from the hospital. New headache was the only reported adverse effect, which was managed with dose reduction and did not require therapy discontinuation., Conclusions: Liposomal amphotericin B may be feasibly administered intrathecally for the adjunctive treatment of severe fungal meningitis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Coccidioides spp. may cause significant disease requiring hospitalisation, but optimal antifungal therapy among inpatients following outpatient fluconazole exposures is unknown., Objectives: The objective of this study is to describe the effectiveness of fluconazole among patients hospitalised for coccidioidomycosis despite recent outpatient fluconazole treatment., Patients/methods: Patients were admitted to an academic medical center in Phoenix, Arizona from 1 January 2013 through 31 December 2020 for coccidioidomycosis following at least 30 days of outpatient treatment and re-initiation of fluconazole upon admission. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an improved response per the change in the modified Mycosis Study Group (MSG) score (a composite of symptoms, serology and radiographic findings) and clinician impressions., Results: Sixty-seven patients were included, with most (54%) admitted to the intensive care unit. Meningitis was the most common infectious presentation (55%), 17 patients (25%) had multiple infection sites, and 23 (34%) were culture-positive for Coccidioides. Upon admission, the median (IQR) MSG score was 11 (9-14), which dropped to 4 (1-7) at end of therapy or last follow-up. Overall, after initiation of fluconazole therapy at a median daily dose of 800 mg, 48 patients (72%) improved in overall status, 10 (15%) showed stable disease and 9 (13%) were unresponsive. Improved response rates were high across all infection sites, including meningitis (68%) and bone infection (71%). There was no significant difference in response rates between patients with and without reported outpatient fluconazole nonadherence., Conclusions: The majority of patients admitted to the hospital for coccidioidomycosis appeared responsive to fluconazole therapy despite past outpatient exposures., (© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Lung transplant recipients residing in the endemic region are vulnerable to severe morbidity and mortality from Coccidioides. As infection risk persists beyond the first posttransplant year, investigations evaluating extended prophylaxis durations are needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients receiving universal lifelong azole antifungal prophylaxis., Methods: Patients receiving transplants from 2013-2018 and initiated on azole antifungal prophylaxis at a lung transplant center in Arizona were included and followed through 2019 or until death, second transplant, or loss to follow-up. Recipients who died or received treatment for coccidioidomycosis during the transplant admission, or who had received a previous transplant, were excluded. The primary outcome was proven or probable coccidioidomycosis with new asymptomatic seropositivity assessed secondarily., Results: A total of 493 lung transplant recipients were included, with 82% initiated on itraconazole prophylaxis, 9.3% on voriconazole, and 8.5% on posaconazole. Mean age at transplant was 62 years, 77% were diabetic, and 8% were seropositive for Coccidioides pretransplant. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 1 proven infection and 1 case of new asymptomatic seropositivity (1/493 each, 0.2% incidence) occurred during the study period. The single coccidioidomycosis case occurred 5 years posttransplant in a patient who had azole prophylaxis stopped several months prior. Although within-class switches were common throughout the study period, permanent discontinuation of azole prophylaxis was rare (1.4% at end of follow-up)., Conclusions: Universal lifelong azole prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients residing in endemic regions., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background Methods Results Conclusion Coccidioidomycosis may cause severe disseminated disease and mortality among lung transplant recipients. A strategy of lifelong azole prophylaxis was previously associated with low rates of coccidioidomycosis. Whether lung transplant recipients relocating to the Coccidioides endemic region are also at risk and would benefit from antifungal prophylaxis is unknown.Lung transplant recipients transplanted at an outside center with low Coccidioides endemicity before relocating for post‐transplant follow‐up at a transplant center in Phoenix, Arizona from January 2013 to March 2024 were included. The primary outcome was proven or probable coccidioidomycosis per Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions.Forty lung transplant recipients were included, with 62.5% not receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of transfer. The median time from transplant to relocation was 34 months. Of those not on prophylaxis, 96% were initiated on azole therapy at the first clinic visit, with 72% prescribed itraconazole. Coccidioides serologic testing was performed in 30% of the cohort, most often in the context of a broad diagnostic work‐up for suspected infection during hospitalization. After a median follow‐up of 31 months, one case (2.5%) of proven pulmonary coccidioidomycosis was identified, occurring 4.8 years post‐transplant and >2 years post‐transfer in a cystic fibrosis patient who had a pause in fluconazole prophylaxis for >1 month prior to diagnosis due to gastrointestinal intolerance and access issues. The patient was treated and maintained on isavuconazole without complications.Azole antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of coccidioidomycosis among lung transplant recipients relocating to the highly endemic region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]