Search

Objectives Hypoplasia of the auditory nerve (AN) refers to significant narrowing of the VIIIth cranial nerve which could compromise stimulation of the nerve by electrical pulses delivered from a cochlear implant (CI), thereby hindering activity in other parts of the auditory pathways. To compensate, high current levels or increased charge may be required to elicit auditory perception causing current to spread to other cranial nerves and potentially resulting in unwanted myogenic responses. Deficits in central auditory activity could reduce perception of speech and language. In the present study, we measured auditory brainstem responses in children with and without hypoplasia of the AN to answer the following questions. In children with hypoplastic ANs, (a) can CI stimulation evoke typical patterns of activity from the AN and brainstem?, (b) do brainstem responses change with CI experience?, (c) are evoked responses dependent on the size of the AN pathway?, and (d) does auditory development measured by behavioral tests of speech perception develop more slowly than in peers with normal AN diameter? Design Of 807 children using CIs in our program, 20 (2.5%) were identified as having AN hypoplasia using high-resolution computed tomographic scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging. An age-matched control group of children using CIs with normal AN diameter were recruited to compare electrophysiological and behavioral measures. Radiologic imaging was used to measure the diameter of the internal auditory canal (IAC), auditory nerve canal (ANC), and AN. Electrophysiological testing of the evoked compound action potential and auditory brainstem response was performed at CI activation and every 3 mo after initial testing up to 2 yr. Peak latency and waveform morphology were compared between study and control groups. Tests of speech perception and discrimination were attempted every 12 mo after device activation up to 10 yr. Results : Hypoplastic AN was identified as moderate to critical stenosis of the IAC, ANC, and AN. Initial electrically evoked compound action potential responses were mostly absent in children with AN hypoplasia. In the time window when electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses would be expected, some responses included single amplitude peaks at normal wave eV latencies, but the majority were abnormal, with peaks at atypical latencies or with no observable wave peaks. All evoked responses were inconsistent over time and did not reflect a typical pattern of auditory brainstem development. Speech perception scores were significantly poorer in the study group compared with controls and did not improve with CI experience. The type of abnormal evoked waveform response was independent of IAC, ANC, or AN diameter and also independent of behavioral outcome measures. Conclusions : Evoked responses recorded in CI children with AN hypoplasia indicate a high incidence of nonauditory activity with CI use. The range of abnormal responses was not predicted by the severity of the hypoplastic AN or associated structures. This, along with poorer auditory development compared with peers with normal AN diameters, suggests that children with hypoplasia of the AN are poor candidates for cochlear implantation.

Electrophysiological thresholds do not accurately predict behavioral thresholds in pediatric cochlear implant users possibly due to differences in rate and duration of pulse presentation. We asked: (1) Is there an effect of rate of stimulus presentation on the electrophysiological responses of the auditory brainstem and thalamo-cortex? and (2) can the relationship between electrophysiological and behavioral thresholds be improved by using the same rate of pulse presentation? Behavioral and electrophysiological (EABR and EMLR) responses were elicited for 14 children to single electrical pulses and pulse trains of 2ms ranging in rate from 500 to 3600 pulses per second (pps). Low rate (500pps) pulse trains resulted in an increase in EABR wave eIII amplitude and a decrease in wave eV amplitude. Further rate increases resulted in smaller EABR wave amplitudes. EMLR amplitudes were unaffected by increases in rate as were EABR and EMLR latencies. Behavioral thresholds decreased with increasing rate, however, there was no associated reduction in electrophysiological thresholds. Correlation between behavioral and electrophysiological thresholds did not improve by using the same rate of electrical pulse stimulation. Results suggest: (1) Higher rates of electrical pulse presentation increase the potential for neural adaptation in the auditory brainstem and (2) using the same rate of electrical pulse presentation does not improve the ability of EABR and EMLR thresholds to predict behavioral thresholds.

A period of unilateral implant use before bilateral implantation affects timing of brainstem processes measured by the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR).EABR latencies decrease with unilateral implant use potentially disrupting binaural timing cues important in auditory brainstem processing of bilateral input.EABRs were evoked by electrical pulses from the left, right, and both implants simultaneously in 3 groups of children. All were initially implanted at ages younger than 3 years and had the following: 1) a long delay (2 yr [n = 16]), 2) a short delay (1 yr [n = 15]), or 3) no delay (n = 15) between left and right ear implantation. Responses were recorded on the first day of bilateral implant use and 3 and 9 months thereafter.Relative to responses evoked in the experienced ear, the naive ear showed prolonged latency in both the EABR peaks and the binaural difference response. After 3 and 9 months of bilateral implant use, the relative prolongation decreased in the long and short delay groups, but significant differences persisted in the former. No clear differences in latencies evoked by the left versus right implant were found at any time point in children receiving bilateral implants simultaneously.Results suggest potential disruptions to binaural brainstem processing based on timing cues in children receiving a second cochlear implant after more than 2 years of unilateral implant use that persist through at least the first 9 months of bilateral implant use.

Binaural auditory brainstem processing was examined using evoked potential measures in 40 children who were implanted early and received a second implant simultaneously or after long or short periods of unilateral implant use. Wave latencies were shorter when evoked by the experienced versus naïve implanted ear at initial bilateral activation. Binaural difference waves were detected in most children in response to apical but not basal electrode stimulation and were prolonged in latency in children implanted after long or short delays between implants. Timing differences between the implanted ears in children receiving sequential but not simultaneous bilateral implants reflect a relative immaturity of pathways innervating the second ear and results in abnormal timing of binaural processing at this initial implant stage.

Objectives Interaural level differences (ILD) and interaural timing differences (ITD) are important cues for locating sounds in space. Adult bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users use ILDs more effectively than ITDs. Few studies investigated the ability of children who use bilateral CIs to make use of these binaural cues. Our working hypothesis was that children using bilateral CIs are able to perceive changes in ITDs and ILDs similar to their normal-hearing (NH) peers. Design Participants were two groups of children; 19 bilateral implant users (CI) and nine NH children. The children in the CI group had received a second CI after 4.9 +/- 2.8 yrs of unilateral use. Children performed a four alternative forced-choice lateralization task in which they were asked to describe stimuli as coming from the left side, right side, middle of the head, or from both sides simultaneously. Stimuli were 500 msec trains of electrical pulses delivered to apical electrode no. 18 (CI group) or clicks (NH group) presented 11 times per second with either ITDs (0, 400, 1000, or 2000 microsec delay between sides) or level differences (0, 10, or 20 Current Units (CI group) or 0, 10, or 20 dB (NH group) difference between sides). ITDs were presented using current levels that were balanced using left and right electrically evoked brain stem responses. Stimulus levels evoking response amplitudes that were most similar were used. Results Responses from children in the CI group changed significantly with changes in ILD of bilateral stimuli, but not with changes in ITD. Responses from children in the CI group were significantly different from those in the NH group in three ways. Children in the CI group perceived bilaterally presented electrical pulses: (1) to come from the second implanted side more often than the first, (2) to rarely come from the middle, and (3) to come from both sides of the head simultaneously. Perceived changes in lateralization with ILD changes were correlated with differences in amplitudes of electrically evoked brain stem responses by the left versus right CI. Conclusions The results of this study illustrate that children who use bilateral CIs can lateralize stimuli on the basis of level cues, but have difficulty interpreting interimplant timing differences. Perceived lateralization of bilaterally presented stimuli to the second implanted side in many of the stimulus conditions may relate to the use of different device generations between sides. Further differences from normal lateralization responses could be due to abnormal binaural processing, possibly resulting from a period of unilateral hearing before the provision of a second implant or due to insufficiently matched interimplant stimuli. It may be possible to use objective measures such as electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses wave eV amplitudes to provide balanced levels of bilateral stimulation in children who have had no binaural hearing experience.