Search

Introduction: The main objective of the study was to validate the Norwegian translation of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and investigate the SSQ disability profiles in a cochlear implant (CI) user population., Methods: The study involved 152 adult CI users. The mean age at implantation was 55 (standard deviation [SD] = 16), and the mean CI experience was 5 years (SD = 4.8). The cohort was split into three groups depending on the hearing modality: bilateral CIs (BCIs), a unilateral CI (UCI), and bimodal (CI plus contralateral hearing aid; HCI). The SSQ disability profiles of each group were compared with those observed in similar studies using the English version and other translations of the SSQ. Standard values, internal consistency, sensitivity, and floor and ceiling effects were investigated, and the missing-response rates to specific questions were calculated. Relationships to speech perception were measured using monosyllabic word scores and the Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test scores., Results: In the BCI group, the average scores were around 5.0 for the speech and spatial sections and 7.0 for the qualities section (SD ∼2). The average scores of the UCI and HCI groups were about one point lower than those of the BCI group. The SSQ disability profiles were comparable to the profiles in similar studies. The slopes of the linear regression lines measuring the relationships between the SSQ speech and monosyllabic word scores were 0.8 per 10% increase in the monosyllabic word score for the BCI group (explaining 35% of the variation) and 0.4 for the UCI and HCI groups (explaining 22-23% of the variation)., Conclusion: The Norwegian version of the SSQ measures hearing disability similar to the original English version, and the internal consistency is good. Differences in the recipients' pre-implantation variables could explain some variations we observed in the SSQ responses, and such predictors should be investigated. Data aggregation will be possible using the SSQ as a routine clinical assessment in global CI populations. Moreover, pre-implantation variables should be systematically registered so that they can be used in mixed-effects models., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Hypothesis: Gross electrode movements detected with intraoperative, real-time X-ray fluoroscopy will correlate with fluctuations in cochlear output, as measured with intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG)., Background: Indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are expanding to include patients with residual hearing; however, implant recipients often lose residual hearing after CI. The objective of this study was to identify probable traumatic events during implantation by combining electrophysiological monitoring of cochlear function with simultaneous X-ray monitoring. The surgical timing of these apparently traumatic events was then investigated., Methods: For 19 adult patients (21 surgeries, 2 bilateral), the ECochG responses were measured during implantation of a cochlear nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532/CI632, Cochlear Ltd Australia Nucleus slim modiolar). Simultaneous fluoroscopy was performed, as well as a postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) scan. For all patients, pre- and postoperative audiograms were recorded up to 1 year after surgery to record the loss of residual hearing., Results: Electrode insertions for 21 surgeries were successfully monitored. A drop in ECochG response was significantly correlated with reduced hearing preservation compared with patients with preserved responses throughout. Drops in the ECochG response were measured to occur during insertion, because of movement of the array after insertion was complete, including while sealing of the electrode array at the round window or coiling of the array lead within the mastoid cavity. In some patients, a reduction in cochlear output, resulting in poor ECochG response, was inferred to occur before the beginning of implantation., Conclusion: The combination of perioperative ECochG measurements, microscope video, fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT scan may inform on what causes the loss of residual hearing after implantation. These findings will be used to improve the surgical procedure in future., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: University Hospital Oslo and University of Melbourne receive funding from Cochlear Ltd. This study was funded by Cochlear Research & Development Ltd under reference number IIR-1897., (Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.)

The objective to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implantation has recently led to the use of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) as an intraoperative monitoring tool. Currently, a decrease in the amplitude of the difference between responses to alternating-polarity stimuli (DIF response), predominantly reflecting the hair cell response, is used for providing feedback. Including other ECochG response components, such as phase changes and harmonic distortions, could improve the accuracy of surgical feedback. The objectives of the present study were (1) to compare simultaneously recorded stepwise intracochlear and extracochlear ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, (2) to explore patterns in features extracted from the intracochlear ECochG recordings relating to hearing preservation or hearing loss, and (3) to design support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers of acoustic hearing preservation that treat each subject as a sample and use all intracochlear ECochG recordings made during electrode array insertion for classification. Forty subjects undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery at the Oslo University Hospital, St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, or the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. In this cohort, DIF response amplitude decreases did not relate to postoperative acoustic hearing preservation. Exploratory analysis of the feature set extracted from the ECochG responses and preoperative audiogram showed that the features were not discriminative between outcome classes. The SVM and RF classifiers that were trained on these features could not distinguish cases with hearing loss and hearing preservation. These findings suggest that hearing loss following CI surgery is not always reflected in intraoperative ECochG recordings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The first surgeries with CI532 showed an effect of the proximity of the electrode to the modiolus on the Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs)., Objectives: Objectives of the study were to investigate the effect of the "pullback" procedure on intraoperative ECAP responses in three different electrode array positions and additionally to compare behavioral thresholds with the thresholds obtained in a group of patients using the standard insertion. The hypothesis of this study is that pullback will cause lower ECAPs and behavioral thresholds., Patients: The study included 40 patients, 20 in the pullback insertion group and 20 in the standard insertion group (without pullback)., Method: During insertion of the CI532 electrode array, ECAP was performed in three different positions for the pullback group: at initial insertion, at over-insertion, and after pullback. Insertion was monitored by fluoroscopy. In the standard group, ECAP was performed at the initial position, which is also the final position. ECAP thresholds (T-ECAPs) were compared within subjects at the initial and the final position in the pullback group and between groups in the final positions of the pullback and standard groups. Programming levels (C- and T-levels) were compared between the two groups 1 year after switch-on., Results: Intraoperative measurements pullback shows lower average T-ECAPs after pullback compared to thresholds in initial position. Comparison of intraoperative T-ECAPs at the final positions showed no statistically significant difference between the pullback group and the standard insertion group. Furthermore, 1 year after switch-on there was no statistically significant difference in C- and T-levels between the two groups., Conclusion: The pullback maneuver of the CI532 electrode array after an over-insertion gave significantly lower T-ECAPs compared to the thresholds at the initial position. However, the between-groups analysis of pullback and standard insertion showed neither significantly different T-ECAPs nor different programming levels. Because T-ECAPs and programming levels vary considerably between subjects, large groups are required to detect differences between groups. Additionally, the effect pullback technique to preserving the residual hearing is not known yet., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: As of 2014 more than 1200 patients have received a cochlear implant (CI) at Oslo University Hospital (OUS) and approximately half of them have been children. The data obtained from these patients have been used to develop a comprehensive database for a systematic analysis of several objective measurements and programming measurements. During the past 10 years, we have used an objective measurements protocol for our CI surgeries. Our intra-operative protocol includes: Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAP), visually observed Electrically evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold (ESRT), and electrode impedances. Post-operative (Post-OP) programming sessions typically begin 4-6 weeks after surgery and continue on a scheduled basis. The initial programming data include threshold levels (T-levels) and comfortable levels (C-levels) for the different patient age groups. In this study, we compared initial stimulation levels and stimulation levels after at least 1 year of CI with objective measurements obtained intra-operatively., Method: This study focused on the development of a comprehensive database of detailed intra-operative objective measures and post-OP programming measurements from a group of 296 CI patients who received the same type of CI and electrode configuration (Cochlear Corporation CI with Contour electrode). This group included 92 bilateral CI patients. Measurements from 388 CI devices were studied. Patients were divided into 5 different age groups at the age of implantation: 0-2, 2-5, 5-10, 10-20, and above 20 years in order to investigate age-related differences in programming levels and objective measurements. For the comparison analysis we used T- and C-levels obtained after the last day of initial programming and also after at least 1 year implant use. These programming levels were then correlated with some of the intra-operative objective measurements., Results: T-levels were found to be the lowest for the youngest patient group and increased with age. C-levels varied within age groups and frequency range. Patients above 20 years of age had the highest comfort levels in the low to mid-frequencies (electrodes 22-8) and the lowest comfort levels in the high-frequency range (electrodes 1-7). Correlation coefficients between intra-operative objective measurements and programming levels were found to be in the range of no correlation to moderate correlation. Adult patients had the most significant correlation coefficients between ECAP thresholds and T-levels in the low frequencies. The younger patients aged 10-20 years and 5-10 years had more significant correlations in the higher frequency channels compared to the other age groups. Intra-operative visually observed ESRTs and electrode impedances were not significantly correlated with initial or stable programming levels for the children or adults., Conclusion: Analyzing initial and follow-up mapping levels from previous patients is very important for a CI Center in terms of quality control. The mean T/C-levels reported in this study can provide guidance to our programming audiologists and help them determine the initial programming levels to be stored in the speech processor, especially for very young patients. Unfortunately intra-operative objective measures in our study, such as ECAP, ESRT, and electrode impedances did not provide statistically significant correlations that may help to predict the programming T- and C-levels for all patients. However, we have observed cases where the intra-operative objective measures of ESRT and TECAP profiles were very similar to an individual's MAP profile. It was not possible, however, to determine why some patients did not have an objective measures profile that was similar to their programming levels profile.

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of vestibular tests and the residual hearing of patients who have undergone full insertion cochlear implant surgery using the round window approach with a hearing preservation protocol (RW-HP) or the standard cochleostomy approach (SCA) without hearing preservation. A prospective study of 34 adults who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation was carried out. One group was operated using the RW-HP ( n = 17) approach with Med-El +Flex electrode array with full insertion, while the control group underwent a more conventional SCA surgery ( n = 17) with shorter perimodiolar electrodes. Assessments of residual hearing, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), videonystagmography, subjective visual vertical/horizontal (SVH/SVV) were performed before and after surgery. There was a significantly ( p < 0.05) greater number of subjects who exhibited complete or partial hearing preservation in the deep insertion RW-HP group (9/17) compared to the SCA group (2/15). A higher degree of vestibular loss but a lower degree of vertigo symptoms could be seen in the RW-HP group, but the differences were not statistically significant. It is possible to preserve residual hearing to a certain extent also with deep insertion. Full insertion with hearing preservation was less harmful to residual hearing particularly at 125 Hz ( p < 0.05), than was the standard cochleostomy approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the intracochlear electrode position on the residual hearing and VNG- and cVEMP responses. Design: Prospective pilot study. Study sample: Thirteen adult patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant surgery were examined with high-resolution rotational tomography after cochlear implantation. All subjects were also tested with VNG, and 12 of the subjects were tested with cVEMP and audiometry before and after surgery. Results: We found that although the electrode was originally planned to be positioned inside the scala tympani, only 8 of 13 had full insertion into the scala tympani. Loss of cVEMP response occurred to the same extent in the group with full scala tympani positioning and the group with scala vestibuli involvement. There was a non-significant difference in the loss of caloric response and residual hearing between the two groups. Interscalar dislocation of the electrode inside the cochlea was observed in two patients. A higher loss of residual hearing could be seen in the group with electrode dislocation between the scalae. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that intracochlear electrode dislocation is a possible cause to loss of residual hearing during cochlear implantation but cannot be the sole cause of postoperative vestibular loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]