Search

Random I/O (RIO) codes, recently introduced by Sharon and Alrod, is a coding scheme to improve the random input/output performance of flash memories. Multilevel flash memories require, on the average, more than a single read threshold in order to read a single logical page. This number is important to be optimized since it sets the read latency of flash memories. An $(n,M,t)$ RIO code assumes that $t$ pages are stored in $n$ cells with $t+1$ levels. The first page is read by applying a read threshold between levels $t$ and $t+1$. Similarly, the second page is read by applying a read threshold between levels $t-1$ and $t$, and so on. As a consequence, if a cell reads as bit 1 for a page (say page $m$), the cell also reads as bit 1 for all the successive pages ($m+1, m+2 \cdots$). Therefore, Sharon and Alrod showed that the design of RIO codes is equivalent to the design of WOM codes. The latter family of codes attracted substantial attention in recent years in order to improve the lifetime of flash memories by allowing writing multiple messages to the memory without the need for an erase operation. In this paper, we notice two important distinctions between RIO codes and WOM codes. While in WOM codes, the messages are received one after the other and thus are not known all in advance, in RIO codes the information of all logical pages can be known in advance when programming the cells. Even though this knowledge does not improve the maximum sum-rate of RIO codes, it allows the design of efficient high-rate codes with a moderate block length, which do not exist for WOM codes. We also study another family of RIO codes, called here partial RIO codes, that allow to find even more efficient codes while allowing to sense more than a single threshold to read some pages. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In a parallel concatenated convolutional code, an information sequence is encoded by a convolutional encoder, and an interleaved version of the information sequence is encoded by another convolutional encoder. We discuss the situation in which we require both convolutional encoders to end in the all-zero state. To do so, we have to split an information word in two parts. One part contains the true information bits, and the second part contains the so-called tail bits, which are special bits with values computed such that both encoders end in the all-zero state. Depending on the interleaver, a different number of tail bits are needed. By using a constructive method, we give a characterization of all interleavers for a prescribed number of tail bits. We explain the method of encoding. In addition, simulations have been carried out to investigate the performance of codes resulting from simultaneous zero-tailing. This shows that simultaneous zero-tailing is similar in performance as compared to previously known zero-tailing methods (but with fewer trellis termination bits) and that it is better than zero-tailing just one of the encoders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]