Search

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysis is an area of increasing interest for the in‐situ production of H2O2 or the development of energy‐related devices such as hydrogen fuel cells. Although pyrolyzed catalysts still offer the best performances to date with reference to the organic‐based catalysts, metal‐free and non‐pyrolyzed covalent organic frameworks (COFs) stands out as promising alternatives candidates due to their favourable characteristics such as crystallinity, porosity, and organic composition, allowing the study of structural‐property relationships. Herein, we present the design principles and recent advances in COFs‐based ORR electrocatalysts, demonstrating how composition influences the activity and electronic pathway of the oxygen reduction process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, we present a novel approach for the synthesis of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) that overcomes the common limitations of non‐scalable solvothermal procedures. Our method allows for the room‐temperature and scalable synthesis of a highly fluorinated DFTAPB‐TFTA‐COF, which exhibits intrinsic hydrophobicity. We used DFT‐based calculations to elucidate the role of the fluorine atoms in enhancing the crystallinity of the material through corrugation effects, resulting in maximized interlayer interactions, as disclosed both from PXRD structural resolution and theoretical simulations. We further investigated the electrocatalytic properties of this material towards the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Our results show that the fluorinated COF produces hydrogen peroxide selectively with low overpotential (0.062 V) and high turnover frequency (0.0757 s−1) without the addition of any conductive additives. These values are among the best reported for non‐pyrolyzed and metal‐free electrocatalysts. Finally, we employed DFT‐based calculations to analyse the reaction mechanism, highlighting the crucial role of the fluorine atom in the active site assembly. Our findings shed light on the potential of fluorinated COFs as promising electrocatalysts for the ORR, as well as their potential applications in other fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are defined as crystalline organic polymers with programmable topological architectures using properly predesigned building blocks precursors. Since the development of the first COF in 2005, many works are emerging using this kind of material for different applications, such as the development of electrochemical sensors and biosensors. COF shows superb characteristics, such as tuneable pore size and structure, permanent porosity, high surface area, thermal stability, and low density. Apart from these special properties, COF's electrochemical behaviour can be modulated using electroactive building blocks. Furthermore, the great variety of functional groups that can be inserted in their structures makes them interesting materials to be conjugated with biological recognition elements, such as antibodies, enzymes, DNA probe, aptamer, etc. Moreover, the possibility of linking them with other special nanomaterials opens a wide range of possibilities to develop new electrochemical sensors and biosensors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Covalent organic Frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystalline macromolecular materials build-up by monomers with specific symmetries or functionalities. There are important limitations in the synthesis of highly ordered COFs, such as the shape and packing of the building blocks. Thus, the presence of fluorine atoms that lie perpendicular to the bisecting plane of BODIPY derivatives together with the presence of four bulky methyl groups could hinder the crystallization process in COF synthesis. For that reason, BODIPY-based COFs are rarely incorporated to COF networks. In this work, following the mixed linker strategy, a pre-synthetic method to dope COF structures with BODIPY units was developed. The materials have been processed into fluorescent Covalent Organic Nanosheets (CONs) with defined particle-size distributions around 100 nm, suitable for cellular biomedical applications. The viability of the CONs was evaluated using Sk-Mel-103 cells, demonstrating the internalization showing 100% cell viability. We envisage that this work could accelerate the discovery of new COF-based materials for biomedical sciences. • BODIPY doped COFs were prepared via a one-pot procedure by solvothermal Schiff's base condensation reaction. • The bulk COFs were delaminated into Covalent Organic Nanosheets (CONs) via liquid phase exfoliation. • The CONs were characterized by UV-VIS and Fluorescence spectroscopies, corroborating the introduction of BDP chromophores. • The developed material did not exhibit any sign of toxicity in cells after the cell internalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are emerging materials with structural modularity that allows their application in many fields. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental impact of using an imine based covalent organic framework (RT-COF-1) for both surface printing (Case A) and 3D inkjet printing (Case B) by applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Experimental data on RT-COF-1 synthesis as well as results obtained by simulation of their precursors production, 1,3,5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) benzene (TAPB) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbaldehyde (BTCA), are used. LCA results show that monomer synthesis is the most important contributor to environmental impacts in both case studies. On the other hand, the contribution of solvents used in Case A is also remarkable. The comparison between both case studies indicates that the environmental impacts of Case B is lower than that of Case A (reduction within 5%–65%). Finally, LCA results of Case B are compared to other materials used for 3D-printing, such as polymerizable ionic liquids (PILs). The results show that RT–COF–1 compares favourably with PILs in five of nine impact categories, being especially relevant the reductions achieved in the abiotic depletion and acidification potential (>90%), in the primary energy consumption (⁓35%) and carbon footprint (⁓50%), suggesting the potential of RT–COF–1 as 3D-printing material from an environmental perspective. This work is a first step for further research to highlight the main environmental burdens of using COF-based materials in this application. [Display omitted] • LCA methodology applied to imine-based COF for inkjet printing. • 3D-printing is superior to surface printing from an environmental point of view. • Solvents and synthesis of precursors are the main contributors to overall impact. • Environmental footprint of RT–COF–1 is comparable to polymerizable ionic liquids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]