Search

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Many studies have reported an association between FGR and fetal Doppler indices focusing on umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and ductus venosus (DV). The uteroplacental-fetal circulation which affects the fetal growth consists of not only UA, MCA, and DV, but also umbilical vein (UV), placenta and uterus itself. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of large-scale cohort studies that have assessed the association between UV, uterine wall, and placental thickness with perinatal outcomes in FGR, in conjunction with all components of the uteroplacental-fetal circulation. Therefore, this multicenter study will evaluate the association among UV absolute flow, placental thickness, and uterine wall thickness and adverse perinatal outcome in FGR fetuses. This multicenter retrospective cohort study will include singleton pregnant women who undergo at least one routine fetal ultrasound scan during routine antepartum care. Pregnant women with fetuses having structural or chromosomal abnormalities will be excluded. The U-AID indices (UtA, UA, MCA, and UV flow, placental and uterine wall thickness, and estimated fetal body weight) will be measured during each trimester of pregnancy. The study population will be divided into two groups: (1) FGR group (pregnant women with FGR fetuses) and (2) control group (those with normal growth fetus). We will assess the association between U-AID indices and adverse perinatal outcomes in the FGR group and the difference in U-AID indices between the two groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to develop an early pregnancy risk scoring model for pregnancy-associated hypertension (PAH) based on maternal pre-pregnancy characteristics, such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) or neither. The perinatal databases of seven hospitals from January 2009 to December 2020 were randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 70:30. The data of a total pregnant restricted population (women not taking aspirin during pregnancy) were analyzed separately. Three models (model 1, pre-pregnancy factors only; model 2, adding MAP; model 3, adding MAP and PAPP-A) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) risk factors model were compared. A total of 2840 (8.11%) and 1550 (3.3%) women subsequently developed PAH and preterm PAH, respectively. Performances of models 2 and 3 with areas under the curve (AUC) over 0.82 in both total population and restricted population were superior to those of model 1 (with AUCs of 0.75 and 0.748, respectively) and the ACOG risk model (with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.66) for predicting PAH and preterm PAH. The final scoring system with model 2 for predicting PAH and preterm PAH showed moderate to good performance (AUCs of 0.78 and 0.79, respectively) in the test set. "A risk scoring model for PAH and preterm PAH with pre-pregnancy factors and MAP showed moderate to high performances. Further prospective studies for validating this scoring model with biomarkers and uterine artery Doppler or without them might be required". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate whether women with a short cervical length (CL), but delivered at term in the first pregnancy might have increased risks of having short cervix and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in the subsequent pregnancies. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including singleton gestations who were delivered between Jan 2011 and Dec 2018, who had had one childbirth experience and who had transvaginal sonographic CL assessment performed at mid-trimester (18 ~ 30 weeks) in both pregnancy. The women were divided into four group according to the history of preterm birth and a short cervix (< 25 mm before 30 weeks of gestation): (1) the Preterm-short cervix group, (2) the Preterm-no shortening group, (3) the Term-short cervix group, and (4) the Term-no shortening group. We compared the risk of having short cervix and sPTB during the second pregnancy of women. Secondary outcomes were threatened preterm labor, need for tocolytics, and cerclage placement. Results: A total of 804 women met our inclusion criteria. The rate of having short cervix (< 25 mm before 28 weeks of gestation) during the second pregnancy in women in the Term-short cervix group (43.2%) was significantly higher than those in women in the Term-no shortening group (6.6%), and in the Preterm-no shortening group (8.8%) (all p < 0.001 with Bonferroni correction), but not higher than those in women with the Preterm-short cervix group (30.8%, p > 0.05 with Bonferroni correction). When compared with women in the Preterm-no shortening group, women in the Term-short cervix group were also at an increased risk of need for need of tocolytics (60.2% vs. 26.5%) and cerclage placement (15.9% vs. 6.1%, all p < 0.001). Women in the Term-short cervix group had an increased risk of sPTB (< 37 weeks) during the second pregnancy, as compared to those in the Term-no shortening group (adjusted odds ratio 5.098, 95% CI 2.107–11.874). Conclusion: Women with a history of short cervix in their first pregnancy, but who delivered at term, were at increased risk of having a short cervix and sPTB in their second pregnancy, as compared to women with a history of term delivery without cervical shortening. Thus, short cervix of the previous pregnancy might be a predictive factors for preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate not only the risk of total preterm birth (PTB) but also spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and indicated preterm birth (iPTB) in vanishing twin (VT). Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. In 12 different healthcare institutions, women with singleton pregnancies were enrolled in early pregnancy and followed up till delivery. Results: A total of 4,746 women were included in the final analysis, and. the frequency of VT was 1.1% (54/4746). VT group had a higher risk for total PTB (PTB<34 weeks, 2.1% vs. 14.8%, p<0.001; PTB<32 weeks, 1.6% vs. 13.0%, p<0.001; PTB<28 weeks, 0.9% vs. 13.0%, p<0.001) than singleton group. The VT group had increased risk for both sPTB and iPTB (<34 weeks, <32 weeks, and <28 weeks), and this increased risk for sPTB and iPTB in VT group remained significant even after controlling for confounders such as maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, and mode of conception. Conclusion: Vanishing twin can be an independent risk factor for both sPTB and iPTB when compared with singleton pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]