Search

The initiation of tissue remodeling following damage is a critical step in preventing the development of immune-mediated diseases. Several factors contribute to mucosal healing, leading to innovative therapeutic approaches for managing intestinal disorders. However, uncovering alternative targets and gaining mechanistic insights are imperative to enhance therapy efficacy and broaden its applicability across different intestinal diseases. Here we demonstrate that Nmes1, encoding for Normal Mucosa of Esophagus-Specific gene 1, also known as Aa467197, is a novel regulator of mucosal healing. Nmes1 influences the macrophage response to the tissue remodeling cytokine IL-4 in vitro. In addition, using two murine models of intestinal damage, each characterized by a type 2-dominated environment with contrasting functions, the ablation of Nmes1 results in decreased intestinal regeneration during the recovery phase of colitis, while enhancing parasitic egg clearance and reducing fibrosis during the advanced stages of Schistosoma mansoni infection. These outcomes are associated with alterations in CX3CR1 + macrophages, cells known for their wound-healing potential in the inflamed colon, hence promising candidates for cell therapies. All in all, our data indicate Nmes1 as a novel contributor to mucosal healing, setting the basis for further investigation into its potential as a new target for the treatment of colon-associated inflammation., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Immunology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Three receptor tyrosine kinases, Tyro3, Axl, and Mertk (TAM) and their ligands Gas6 and Protein S, have emerged as potent negative regulators of innate immune responses. A number of studies using genetic ablation of TAM loci in mice have elucidated the mechanism of TAM engagement and function during the immune response and removal of apoptotic cells. Following phagocytosis of apoptotic cells or the induction of T-cell dependent adaptive immune responses, ligand-induced TAM signaling dampens proinflammatory cytokine production and thus prevents exaggerated or prolonged inflammation. It is believed that the TAM pathway may play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Suppression of inflammation and removal of apoptotic cells followed by tissue repair are essential processes for disease remission and the successful management of inflammatory bowel disease. In light of the key role of TAMs in controlling inflammatory responses, here, we review the recent advances on TAM research vis-à-vis the resolution of intestinal inflammation. Targeted activation of TAM receptor tyrosine kinases may represent a potent therapeutic opportunity in inflammatory bowel disease.

The receptor tyrosine kinases Axl and Mer, belonging to the Tyro3, Axl and Mer (TAM) receptor family, are expressed in a number of tumor cells and have well-characterized oncogenic roles. The therapeutic targeting of these kinases is considered an anticancer strategy, and various inhibitors are currently under development. At the same time, Axl and Mer are expressed in dendritic cells and macrophages and have an essential function in limiting inflammation. Inflammation is an enabling characteristic of multiple cancer hallmarks. These contrasting oncogenic and anti-inflammatory functions of Axl and Mer posit a potential paradox in terms of anticancer therapy. Here we demonstrate that azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced inflammation-associated cancer is exacerbated in mice lacking Axl and Mer. Ablation of Axl and Mer signaling is associated with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and failure to clear apoptotic neutrophils in the intestinal lamina propria, thereby favoring a tumor-promoting environment. Interestingly, loss of these genes in the hematopoietic compartment is not associated with increased colitis. Axl and Mer are expressed in radioresistant intestinal macrophages, and the loss of these genes is associated with an increased inflammatory signature in this compartment. Our results raise the possibility of potential adverse effects of systemic anticancer therapies with Axl and Mer inhibitors, and underscore the importance of understanding their tissue and cell type-specific functions in cancer.