Search

Background: The endoscopic management of polyps of the lower gastrointestinal tract (l-GIT) has emerged in recent years as a result of numerous technological innovations. However, proven expertise and experience are essential., Objectives: Presentation of novel and standard techniques and best-practice recommendations for the characterization and resection of l‑GIT polyps., Methods: Recent specialist literature and current guidelines., Results: High-definition endoscopy should be the standard when performing colonoscopy. The (virtual) chromoendoscopy can improve detection and characterization of polyps, but always requires special expertise and experience of the endoscopist in advanced endoscopic imaging. In this regard, computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) systems have the potential to support endoscopists in the future. Pedunculated polyps should be removed with a hot snare. Small flat polyps can be resected by cold snare or large forceps. Large, non-pedunculated polyps should be treated in an interdisciplinary approach at a referral center with long-standing experience depending on its malignancy potential. After complete resection of small adenoma without high grade dysplasia, surveillance endoscopy is recommended after 5-10 years. Patients with large adenoma or high grade dysplasia should undergo endoscopy after 3 years and patients with multiple adenoma earlier than 3 years. After incomplete or piecemeal resection or insufficient bowel preparation, near-term endoscopy is recommended., Conclusions: Adequate characterization and treatment are essential for the appropriate management of l‑GIT polyps.

Background: The insufflation of gas during colonoscopy leads to distention of the colon with abdominal discomfort and pain for the patients. Use of CO2 during endoscopy is reported to minimize abdominal discomfort during and after endoscopy. Aim of this study was to find out whether this improvement leads to decreased dosage of sedation drugs in order to improve patient's safety and satisfaction., Methods: In this double-blind, randomized and controlled study 150 Patients referred to colonoscopy were assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. We recorded basic characteristics of colonoscopy and the amount of drugs used for sedation. Patients and investigators filled out questionnaires to record pain, abdominal bloating and flatulence., Results: Seventy-two patients were randomized for examination with room air, 78 patients for use of CO2. We found no difference in basic characteristics of colonoscopy (cecal intubation time and procedure time). Both groups were administered the same amount of drugs for sedation. We found only slight improvement of pain, abdominal bloating and flatulence., Conclusions: The study revealed only moderate positive effects for use of CO2 during colonoscopy. We found only modest improvement of patient's comfort during and after colonoscopy. No reduced doses of drugs for sedation could be recorded.

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)