1. Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Arvind Ramadas, Roisin Bevan, Matthew D. Rutter, Colin J Rees, J Painter, Laura J Neilson, Paul Bassett, Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, Zoe Hoare, Brian P. Saunders, Gayle Clifford, Wee Sing Ngu, Thomas J. Lee, John G Silcock, and Nicola Totton
- Subjects
Adenoma ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colorectal cancer ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Colonoscopy ,colorectal adenomas ,colorectal cancer ,colorectal cancer screening ,law.invention ,Diagnosis, Differential ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Intubation ,colonic adenomas ,Adverse effect ,Mass screening ,Colonoscopes ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Endoscopy ,Equipment Design ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Quality Improvement ,030104 developmental biology ,England ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Differential diagnosis ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business - Abstract
ObjectiveLow adenoma detection rates (ADR) are linked to increased postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates and reduced cancer survival. Devices to enhance mucosal visualisation such as Endocuff Vision (EV) may improve ADR. This multicentre randomised controlled trial compared ADR between EV-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC).DesignPatients referred because of symptoms, surveillance or following a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBt) as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme were recruited from seven hospitals. ADR, mean adenomas per procedure, size and location of adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, EV removal rate, caecal intubation rate, procedural time, patient experience, effect of EV on workload and adverse events were measured.Results1772 patients (57% male, mean age 62 years) were recruited over 16 months with 45% recruited through screening. EAC increased ADR globally from 36.2% to 40.9% (P=0.02). The increase was driven by a 10.8% increase in FOBt-positive screening patients (50.9% SC vs 61.7% EAC, PConclusionEV significantly improved ADR in bowel cancer screening patients and should be used to improve colonoscopic detection.Trial registration numberNCT02552017, Results; ISRCTN11821044, Results.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF