14 results on '"Green, Beverly B."'
Search Results
2. Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests
- Author
-
Green, Beverly B, BlueSpruce, June, Tuzzio, Leah, Vernon, Sally W, Aubree Shay, L, and Catz, Sheryl L
- Subjects
Health Services and Systems ,Public Health ,Health Sciences ,Cancer ,Health Services ,Aging ,Prevention ,Digestive Diseases ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Colo-Rectal Cancer ,Clinical Research ,Good Health and Well Being ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Electronic Health Records ,Female ,Humans ,Interviews as Topic ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Occult Blood ,Patient Compliance ,Postal Service ,Qualitative Research ,Colorectal cancer screening ,Fecal testing ,Adherence ,Qualitative research ,Barriers and facilitators ,Public Health and Health Services ,Epidemiology ,Health services and systems ,Public health - Abstract
BackgroundLong-term adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is particularly important for fecal testing. Some U.S. studies report that only 25% of individuals repeat fecal testing annually. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify barriers and facilitators reported by patients with suboptimal screening adherence to refine interventions for starting ongoing adherence to CRC screening. We also explored whether participants, particularly never screeners, would be willing to do a CRC screening blood test.MethodsForty-one patients who previously enrolled in the Systems of Support to Increase CRC Screening (SOS) trial were interviewed 4-5 years later. Participants were purposively selected to include men and women with diverse race/ethnicities who had either been inconsistent screeners or had never screened during the first three years of SOS despite receiving at least two rounds of mailed fecal tests. Two interviewers conducted 30-min telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. An iterative thematic analysis approach was used.ResultsThemes related to screening barriers were more pervasive among never screeners including: (1) Avoidance (inattention, procrastination) (2) Concerns about handling stool; (3) Health concerns; (4) Fear of a cancer diagnosis or positive test results. Themes related to screening facilitators were more often mentioned by participants who screened at least once including: (1) Use of a simpler 1-sample fecal test; (2) Convenience of mailings and doing the test at home; (3) Salience of prevention, especially as one got older; and (4) Influence of recommendations from providers, family and friends. Participants had diverse preferences for the number (3 on average) and types (phone, mail, text) of screening reminders. Some participants did not prefer e-mail links to the patient shared electronic health record because of difficulties remembering their password. It was acceptable for a nurse or medical assistant not from their clinic to call them as long as that person was knowledgeable about their records and could communicate with their physician. Participants, especially never screeners, were generally very enthusiastic about the potential option of a CRC screening blood test.ConclusionFuture CRC screening programs should be designed to minimize these barriers and maximize facilitators to improve long-term screening adherence.Trial registrationPrimary Funding Agency: The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01CA121125). Registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT00697047 .
- Published
- 2017
3. Health plan adaptations to a mailed outreach program for colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: the BeneFIT study
- Author
-
Coronado, Gloria D., Schneider, Jennifer L., Green, Beverly B., Coury, Jennifer K., Schwartz, Malaika R., Kulkarni-Sharma, Yogini, and Baldwin, Laura Mae
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders
- Author
-
Baldwin, Laura-Mae, Schneider, Jennifer L., Schwartz, Malaika, Rivelli, Jennifer S., Green, Beverly B., Petrik, Amanda F., and Coronado, Gloria D.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders
- Author
-
Coronado, Gloria D, Schneider, Jennifer L, Petrik, Amanda, Rivelli, Jennifer, Taplin, Stephen, and Green, Beverly B
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Health plan‐based mailed fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening among dual‐eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees: Outcomes of 2 program models.
- Author
-
Baldwin, Laura‐Mae, Coronado, Gloria D., West, Imara I., Schwartz, Malaika R., Meenan, Richard T., Vollmer, William M., Petrik, Amanda F., Shapiro, Jean A., Kulkarni‐Sharma, Yogini R., and Green, Beverly B.
- Subjects
EARLY detection of cancer ,MEDICAID ,MEDICARE ,HEALTH insurance ,MEDICAL screening - Abstract
Background: Health insurance plans are increasingly offering mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but few studies have compared the outcomes of different program models (eg, invitation strategies). Methods: This study compares the outcomes of 2 health plan–based mailed FIT program models. In the first program (2016), FIT kits were mailed to all eligible enrollees; in the second program (2018), FIT kits were mailed only to enrollees who opted in after an outreach phone call. Participants in this observational study included dual‐eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees who were aged 50 to 75 years and were due for CRC screening (1799 in 2016 and 1906 in 2018). Six‐month FIT completion rates, implementation outcomes (eg, mailed FITs sent and reminders attempted), and program‐related health plan costs for each program are described. Results: All 1799 individuals in 2016 were sent an introductory letter and a FIT kit. In 2018, all 1906 were sent an introductory letter, and 1905 received at least 1 opt‐in call attempt, with 410 (21.5%) sent a FIT. The FIT completion rate was 16.2% (292 of 1799 [95% CI, 14.5%‐17.9%]) in 2016 and 14.6% (278 of 1906 [95% CI, 13.0%‐16.2%]) in 2018 (P =.36). The overall implementation costs were higher in 2016 ($40,156) than 2018 ($34,899), with the cost per completed FIT slightly higher in 2016 ($138) than 2018 ($126). Conclusions: An opt‐in mailed FIT program achieved FIT completion rates similar to those of a program mailing to all dual‐eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees. Lay Summary: Health insurance plans can use different program models to successfully mail fecal test kits for colorectal cancer screening to dual‐eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees, with nearly 1 in 6 enrollees completing fecal testing. In this study, a health insurance plan demonstrates its ability to deliver 2 different mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program models, with vendors used to manage some program elements. These mailed FIT programs began to close gaps in colorectal cancer screening rates in the health plan's dual‐eligible Medicaid/Medicare population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Colorectal cancer screening: The costs and benefits of getting to 80% in every community.
- Author
-
Green, Beverly B. and Meenan, Richard T.
- Subjects
- *
COLORECTAL cancer , *EARLY detection of cancer , *COMMUNITIES , *COST - Abstract
Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) kits for colorectal cancer screening at home can contribute to reaching national goals of 80% colorectal cancer screening in communities. Policies that support cost‐effective colorectal cancer screening programs would decrease colorectal cancer disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study.
- Author
-
Coronado, Gloria D., Green, Beverly B., West, Imara I., Schwartz, Malaika R., Coury, Jennifer K., Vollmer, William M., Shapiro, Jean A., Petrik, Amanda F., Baldwin, Laura‐Mae, and Baldwin, Laura-Mae
- Subjects
- *
COLORECTAL cancer , *EARLY detection of cancer , *MEDICAID , *MEDICARE - Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer screening uptake is low, particularly among individuals enrolled in Medicaid. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the effectiveness of direct-to-member outreach by Medicaid health insurance plans to raise colorectal cancer screening use, nor how best to deliver such outreach.Methods: BeneFIT is a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of 2 program models that health plans developed for a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) intervention. The programs differed with regard to whether they used a centralized approach (Health Plan Washington) or collaborated with health centers (Health Plan Oregon). The primary implementation outcome of the current study was the percentage of eligible enrollees to whom the plans delivered each intervention component. The primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of FIT completion within 6 months of mailing of the introductory letter.Results: The health plans identified 12,000 eligible enrollees (8551 in Health Plan Washington and 3449 in Health Plan Oregon). Health Plan Washington mailed an introductory letter and FIT kit to 8551 enrollees (100%) and delivered a reminder call to 839 (10.3% of the 8132 attempted). Health Plan Oregon mailed an introductory letter, and a letter and FIT kit plus a reminder postcard to 2812 enrollees (81.5%) and 2650 enrollees (76.8%), respectively. FIT completion rates were 18.2% (1557 of 8551 enrollees) in Health Plan Washington. In Health Plan Oregon, completion rates were 17.4% (488 of 2812 enrollees) among enrollees who were mailed an introductory letter and 18.3% (484 of 2650 enrollees) among enrollees who also were mailed a FIT kit plus reminder postcard.Conclusions: The implementation of mailed FIT outreach by health plans may be effective and could reach many individuals at risk of developing colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC.
- Author
-
Coronado, Gloria D., Retecki, Sally, Schneider, Jennifer, Taplin, Stephen H., Burdick, Tim, and Green, Beverly B.
- Subjects
CLINICAL medicine ,COLON tumors ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,MEDICAL databases ,COMMUNITY health services ,INTERVIEWING ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDICAL records ,MEDICAL screening ,RECTUM tumors ,RESEARCH funding ,HUMAN research subjects ,PATIENT selection - Abstract
Background: Challenges of recruiting participants into pragmatic trials, particularly at the level of the health system, remain largely unexplored. As part of Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), we recruited eight separate community health centers (consisting of 26 individual safety net clinics) into a large comparative effectiveness pragmatic study to evaluate methods of raising the rates of colorectal cancer screening. Methods: In partnership with STOP CRC’s advisory board, we defined criteria to identify eligible health centers and applied these criteria to a list of health centers in Washington, Oregon, and California affiliated with Oregon Community Health Information Network, a 16-state practice-based research network of federally sponsored health centers. Project staff contacted centers that met eligibility criteria and arranged in-person meetings of key study investigators with health center leadership teams. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to thematically analyze the content of discussions during these meetings to identify major facilitators of and barriers to health center participation. Results: From an initial list of 41 health centers, 11 met the initial inclusion criteria. Of these, leaders at three centers declined and at eight centers (26 clinic sites) agreed to participate (73%). Participating and nonparticipating health centers were similar with respect to clinic size, percent Hispanic patients, and percent uninsured patients. Participating health centers had higher proportions of Medicaid patients and higher baseline colorectal cancer screening rates. Common facilitators of participation were perception by center leadership that the project was an opportunity to increase colorectal cancer screening rates and to use electronic health record tools for population management. Barriers to participation were concerns of center leaders about ability to provide fecal testing to and assure follow-up of uninsured patients, limited clinic capacity to prepare mailings required by the study protocol, discomfort with randomization, and concerns about delaying program implementation at some clinics due to the research requirements. Conclusion: Our findings address an important research gap and may inform future efforts to recruit community health centers into pragmatic research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.
- Author
-
Green, Beverly B., Anderson, Melissa L., Chubak, Jessica, Fuller, Sharon, Meenan, Richard T., and Vernon, Sally W.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer , *EARLY detection of cancer , *FOLLOW-up studies (Medicine) , *FECAL analysis , *COLONOSCOPY , *SUBGROUP analysis (Experimental design) , *PATIENT compliance , *COLON tumor prevention , *AGE distribution , *COMPARATIVE studies , *FECAL occult blood tests , *FECES , *LONGITUDINAL method , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *MEDICAL screening , *POSTAL service , *RESEARCH , *SEX distribution , *TIME , *EVALUATION research , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *HEALTH care reminder systems , *PATIENT-centered care ,TUMOR prevention ,RECTUM tumors - Abstract
Background: The current study was conducted to determine the effect of continuing a centralized fecal occult blood test (FOBT) mailed program on screening adherence.Methods: A patient-level randomized controlled trial was conducted in 21 patient-centered medical home primary care clinics between January 2010 and November 2012. A total of 2208 patients ranging in age from 52 to 75 years in a substudy of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up (SOS) trial were randomized at year 3 to continued automated interventions (Continued group), which included mailed information regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening choices, and were mailed stool kit tests or to a group in which interventions were stopped (Stopped group). The main outcomes and measures were the completion of CRC screening in year 3 and by subgroup characteristics, respectively.Results: Adherence to CRC screening in year 3 was found to be significantly higher in patients in the Continued group compared with those in the Stopped group (53.3% vs 37.3%; adjusted net difference, 15.6% [P<.001]). This difference was entirely due to greater completion of FOBT (adjusted net difference, 18.0% [P<.001]). Year 3 CRC screening rates were highest in patients in the Continued group completing FOBT in both years 1 and 2 (77.2%), followed by patients completing only 1 FOBT in 1 of the 2 years (44.6%), with low rates of CRC testing reported among patients not completing any FOBT within the first 2 years (18.1%).Conclusions: A centralized mailed FOBT CRC screening program continued to be more effective than patient-centered medical home usual-care interventions, but only for those patients who had previously completed FOBT testing. Research is needed regarding how to engage patients not completing CRC testing after being mailed at least 2 rounds of FOBT tests. Cancer 2016;122:312-321. © 2015 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.
- Author
-
Gordon, Nancy P. and Green, Beverly B.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer , *FECAL occult blood tests , *EARLY detection of cancer , *PATIENTS' attitudes , *MEDICAL care , *MOTIVATION (Psychology) - Abstract
Background: The one-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gaining popularity for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of average-risk people. However, uptake and annual use remain suboptimal. Methods: In 2013, we mailed questionnaires to three groups of nonHispanic White, Black, and Latino Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) members ages 52-76 who received FIT kits in 2010-2012: Continuers did the FIT all 3 years; Converts in 2012, but not 2010 or 2011; and Nonusers in none of the 3 years. The questionnaires covered social influences, perceived CRC risk, reasons for using (Continuers, Converts) or avoiding using (Nonusers) the FIT, and recommendations for improving the kit. Results: Continuers (n = 607, response rate 67.5 %), Converts (n = 317, response rate 35.6 %), and Nonusers (n = 215, response rate 21.1 %) did not differ in perceived risk or family history of CRC, but Nonusers were less likely than Continuers and Converts to know someone who had polyps or CRC. Continuers, Converts, and Nonusers did not differ in social network encouragement of CRC screening, but did differ in believing that it was very important that they be screened (88.3 %, 68.4 %, 47.7 %) and that their medical team thought it very important that they be screened (88.6 %, 79.9 %, 53.9 %). Approximately half of Continuers and Converts completed the FIT to please their doctor. Converts were less likely than Continuers to use the FIT to "make sure they were OK" (53.7 % vs. 72.6 %) or "protect their health" (46.1 % vs. 76.4 %). Nearly half of Converts completed the FIT out of guilt. Approximately half of FIT kit users suggested adding a disposable glove, extra paper, and wider-mouth tube to the kit. Nonusers' reasons for not using the FIT included discomfort, disgust, or embarrassment (59.6 %); thinking it unnecessary (32.9 %); fatalism/fear (15.5 %); and thinking it too difficult to use (14.5 %), but <10 % did not want CRC screening at all. Conclusions: Nonusers and irregular users of the FIT are less intrinsically motivated to get CRC screening than long-term users and more averse to preparing their stool sample. Changes to the FIT kit to address discomfort and difficulty factors might improve uptake and continued use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Patients' Reactions to Being Offered Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Screening: A Qualitative Analysis.
- Author
-
Shay, L. Aubree, Kimbel, Kilian J., Dorsey, Caitlin N., Jauregui, Leslie C., Vernon, Sally W., Kullgren, Jeffrey T., and Green, Beverly B.
- Subjects
- *
MONETARY incentives , *PATIENTS' attitudes , *COLORECTAL cancer , *INCENTIVE (Psychology) , *EARLY detection of cancer - Abstract
Purpose: To explore financial incentives as an intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) adherence among traditionally disadvantaged patients who have never been screened or are overdue for screening. Approach: We used qualitative methods to describe patients' attitudes toward the offer of incentives, plans for future screening, and additional barriers and facilitators to CRCS. Setting: Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA). Participants: KPWA patients who were due or overdue for CRCS. Method: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 37 patients who were randomized to 1 of 2 incentives (guaranteed $10 or a lottery for $50) to complete CRCS. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative content approach. Results: Patients generally had positive attitudes toward both types of incentives, however, half did not recall the incentive offer at the time of the interview. Among those who recalled the offer, 95% were screened compared to only 25% among those who did not remember the offer. Most screeners stated that staying healthy was their primary motivator for screening, but many suggested that the incentive helped them prioritize and complete screening. Conclusions: Incentives to complete CRCS may help motivate patients who would like to screen but have previously procrastinated. Future studies should ensure that the incentive offer is noticeable and shorten the deadline for completion of FIT screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Taxonomy for colorectal cancer screening promotion: Lessons from recent randomized controlled trials.
- Author
-
Pirbaglou, Meysam, Ritvo, Paul, Paszat, Lawrence, Rabeneck, Linda, Myers, Ronald E, Serenity, Mardie, Gupta, Samir, Inadomi, John M, Green, Beverly B, Jerant, Anthony, and Tinmouth, Jill
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer , *MEDICAL screening , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *CANCER prevention , *TAXONOMY , *COLON tumors , *CLASSIFICATION , *FECAL occult blood tests , *HEALTH promotion , *EARLY detection of cancer , *DIAGNOSIS ,RECTUM tumors - Abstract
Objective: To derive a taxonomy for colorectal cancer screening that advances Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and screening uptake.Design: Detailed publication review, multiple interviews with principal investigators (PIs) and collaboration with PIs as co-authors produced a CRCS intervention taxonomy. Semi-structured interview questions with PIs (Drs. Inadomi, Myers, Green, Gupta, Jerant and Ritvo) yielded details about trial conduct. Interview comparisons led to an iterative process informing serial interviews until a consensus was obtained on final taxonomy structure.Results: These taxonomy headings (Engagement Sponsor, Population Targeted, Alternative Screening Tests, Delivery Methods, and Support for Test Performance (EPADS)) were used to compare studies. Exemplary insights emphasized: 1) direct test delivery to patients; 2) linguistic-ethnic matching of staff to minority subjects; and 3) authorization of navigators to schedule or refer for colonoscopies and/or distribute stool blood tests during screening promotion.Conclusion: PIs of key RCTs (2012-2015) derived a CRCS taxonomy useful in detailed examination of CRCS promotion and design of future RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: Design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.
- Author
-
Coronado, Gloria D., Vollmer, William M., Petrik, Amanda, Taplin, Stephen H., Burdick, Timothy E., Meenan, Richard T., and Green, Beverly B.
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer , *CLINICAL trials , *DRUG design , *IMMUNOCHEMISTRY , *CAUSES of death , *COMPARATIVE studies - Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. The Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colorectal Cancer (STOP CRC) in Priority Populations study is a pragmatic trial and a collaboration between two research institutions and a network of more than 200 safety net clinics. The study will assess the effectiveness of a system-based intervention designed to improve the rates of colorectal-cancer screening using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in federally qualified health centers in Oregon and Northern California. Material and methods STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized comparative-effectiveness pragmatic trial enrolling 26 clinics. Clinics will be randomized to one of two arms. Clinics in the intervention arm (1) will use an automated, data-driven, electronic health record-embedded program to identify patients due for colorectal screening and mail FIT kits (with pictographic instructions) to them; (2) will conduct an improvement process (e.g. Plan-Do-Study-Act) to enhance the adoption, reach, and effectiveness of the program. Clinics in the control arm will provide opportunistic colorectal-cancer screening to patients at clinic visits. The primary outcomes are: proportion of age- and screening-eligible patients completing a FIT within 12 months; and cost, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment of the intervention. Conclusions This large-scale pragmatic trial will leverage electronic health record information and existing clinic staff to enroll a broad range of patients, including many with historically low colorectal-cancer screening rates. If successful, the program will provide a model for a cost-effective and scalable method to raise colorectal-cancer screening rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.