Search

Background: Cell-free DNA detection is becoming a surrogate assay for tumor genotyping. Biological fluids often content a very low amount of cell-free tumor DNA and assays able to detect very low allele frequency mutant with a few quantities of DNA are required. We evaluated the ability of the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform Idylla for the detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Materials and Methods: First, we evaluated the limit of detection of the system using two set of laboratory made samples that mimic mCRC patient plasma, then plasma samples from patients with mCRC were assessed using Idylla system and BEAMing digital PCR technology., Results: Limits of detection of 0.1%, 0.4% and 0.01% for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF respectively have been reached. With our laboratory made samples, sensitivity up to 0.008% has been reached. Among 15 patients' samples tested for KRAS mutation, 2 discrepant results were found between Idylla and BEAMing dPCR. A 100% concordance between the two assays has been found for the detection of NRAS and BRAF mutations in plasma samples., Conclusions: The Idylla system does not reach as high sensitivity as assays like ddPCR but has an equivalent sensitivity to modified NGS technics with a lower cost and a lower time to results. These data allowed to consider the Idylla system in a routine laboratory workflow for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations detection in plasma., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: One of the most notable applications for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a long-term postoperative follow-up. Sometimes referred to as a "liquid (re)biopsy" it is a minimally invasive procedure and can be performed repeatedly at relatively short intervals (months or even weeks). The presence of the disease and the actual extent of the tumor burden (tumor mass) within the patient's body can be monitored. This is of particular importance, especially when evaluating radicality of surgical treatment as well as for early detection of disease progression or recurrence., Aim: To confirm the radicality of surgery using ctDNA and compare available methods for detection of recurrence in metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: A total of 47 patients with detected ctDNA and indications for resection of mCRC were enrolled in the multicenter study involving three surgical centers. Standard postoperative follow-ups using imaging techniques and the determination of tumor markers were supplemented by ctDNA sampling. In addition to the baseline ctDNA testing prior to surgery, a postoperative observation was conducted by evaluating ctDNA presence up to a week after surgery and subsequently at approximately three-month intervals. The presence of ctDNA was correlated with radicality of surgical treatment and the actual clinical status of the patient., Results: Among the monitored patients, the R0 (curative) resection correlated with postoperative ctDNA negativity in 26 out of 28 cases of surgical procedures (26/28, 93%). In the remaining cases of R0 surgeries that displayed ctDNA, both patients were diagnosed with a recurrence of the disease after 6 months. In 7 patients who underwent an R1 resection, 4 ctDNA positivities (4/7, 57%) were detected after surgery and associated with the confirmation of early disease recurrence (after 3 to 7 months). All 15 patients (15/15, 100%) undergoing R2 resection remained constantly ctDNA positive during the entire follow-up period. In 22 cases of recurrence, ctDNA positivity was detected 22 times (22/22, 100%) compared to 16 positives (16/22, 73%) by imaging methods and 15 cases (15/22, 68%) of elevated tumor markers., Conclusion: ctDNA detection in patients with mCRC is a viable tool for early detection of disease recurrence as well as for confirmation of the radicality of surgical treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Therapy targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, also known as ERBB2) is an effective approach for HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). HER2 status is typically determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables noninvasive detection of gene mutations and copy number alterations including HER2 amplification., Materials and Methods: We screened 351 patients with mCRC and studied the clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-positive mCRC. HER2 expression in tumor samples measured with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization was compared with HER2 copy number variation in plasma ctDNA detected by targeted sequence capture covering exons of 170 genes. We also examined the correlation between changes in tumor burden in ctDNA and antitumor response by imaging evaluation during the treatment course., Results: Positive HER2 status was observed in 12 (3.4%) patients (7 males and 5 females), with a median age of 56 years. The HER2 concordance rate between tumor samples and ctDNA was 66.7% (20/30). Changes in tumor burden in ctDNA during the treatment course correlated with responses on imaging., Conclusions: Detection of HER2 copy number variation in ctDNA may be an alternative option for noninvasive determination of HER2 status. Tumor burden changes in ctDNA were consistent with imaging evaluation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is routinely accomplished through histopathologic examination. Prognostic information and treatment decisions are mainly determined by TNM classification, first defined in 1968. In the last decade, patient-specific CRC genomic landscapes were shown to provide important prognostic and predictive information. Therefore, there is a need for developing next generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatic workflows that can be routinely used for the assessment of prognostic and predictive biomarkers., Materials and Methods: To foster the application of genomics in the clinical management of CRCs, the IDEA workflow has been built to easily adapt to the availability of patient specimens and the clinical question that is being asked. Initially, IDEA deploys ad-hoc NGS assays to interrogate predefined genomic target sequences (from 600 kb to 30 Mb) with optimal detection sensitivity. Next, sequencing data are processed through an integrated bioinformatic pipeline to assess single nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, gene copy-number alterations, and chromosomal rearrangements. The overall results are gathered into a user-friendly report., Results: We provide evidence that IDEA is capable of identifying clinically relevant molecular alterations. When optimized to analyze circulating tumor DNA, IDEA can be used to monitor response and relapse in the blood of patients with metastatic CRC receiving targeted agents. IDEA detected primary and secondary resistance mechanisms to ERBB2 blockade including sub-clonal RAS and BRAF mutations., Conclusions: The IDEA workflow provides a flexible platform to integrate NGS and bioinformatic tools for refined diagnosis and management of patients with advanced CRC., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as an excellent candidate for the future of liquid biopsies for many cancers. There has been growing interest in blood-based liquid biopsy because of the potential of ctDNA to produce a noninvasive test that can be used for: the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, monitoring therapy response, and providing information on overall prognosis. The aim of this review was to collate and explore the current evidence regarding ctDNA as a screening tool for colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: A systematic review of published articles in English over the past 20 y was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases on May 23, 2017. After a full-text review, a total of 69 studies were included. Two assessment tools were used to review and compare the methodological quality of these studies., Results: Among the 69 studies included, 17 studies reviewed total cfDNA, whereas six studies looked at the DNA integrity index and 15 focused on ctDNA. There were a total of 40 studies that reviewed methylated cfDNA with 19 of these focussing specifically on SEPT9., Conclusions: The results of this review indicate that methylated epigenetic ctDNA markers are perhaps the most promising candidates for a blood-based CRC-screening modality using cell-free (cf) DNA. Methylated cfDNA appears to be less specific for CRC compared to ctDNA; however, they have demonstrated good sensitivity for early-stage CRC. Further research is required to determine which methylated cfDNA markers are the most accurate when applied to large cohorts of patients. In addition, reliable comparison of results across multiple studies would benefit from standardization of methodology for DNA extraction and PCR techniques in the future., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the hype about circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in the early 2000s and their potential in the diagnosis of metastasis, in recent years, the hope for personalised cancer management relies more on circulating tumour (ct)DNA that has entered the clinic in a much more efficient way. So far, approved methods for CTCs in the clinic only provide the counting of CTCs, which enables monitoring of the progression of metastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients with therapy. Approved methods for ctDNA facilitate the analysis of specific mutations in lung cancer, thereby providing indications for potentially successful treatments. This situation inclined the balance towards molecular analysis in liquid biopsy, leveraged by new technologies and companies providing broader mutation and gene expression analysis towards the early diagnosis of cancer., Study Design: We conducted a search for the studies published to date that provide details about the significance of CTCs in the clinic., Results: Many studies and clinical trials have demonstrated the potential of CTCs in patient screening, early diagnosis, therapy resistance, and patient prognosis., Conclusions: Large multi-centre studies are still needed to formally validate the clinical relevance of CTCs. Meticulous design of the clinical trials is a crucial point to achieve this long-sought objective., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)