Search

Background and Aims: Delayed bleeding (DB) is a major adverse event associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that sometimes causes difficulties in making decisions regarding endoscopic hemostasis. This study identified the factors that contribute to follow-up without endoscopic hemostasis when DB is suspected after colorectal ESD., Methods: In total, 583 patients (603 tumors) who underwent ESD or hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors at Chiba University Hospital between June 2009 and January 2022 were retrospectively registered. Of these, 141 cases (141 tumors) with DB, and hematochezia or hemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dL after colorectal ESD, were analyzed. The DB group was divided into the Hemostasis group (H group; endoscopic hemostasis performed) and no-Hemostasis group (no-H group; no endoscopy performed, or endoscopy performed but no hemostasis performed after hematochezia or hemoglobin decrease). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the factors contributing to follow-up., Results: Thirty-one patients with 31 tumors were categorized into the H group, and 110 patients with 110 tumors were in the no-H group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that date from ESD to first hematochezia ≤Day 3 (odds ratio, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-14.33; P = .010) and bleeding duration ≤1 day (odds ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-8.34; P = .009) contributed to follow-up., Conclusions: In cases of DB after colorectal ESD, a bleeding duration ≤1 day or date from ESD to first hematochezia ≤Day 3 may contribute to follow-up observation without endoscopic hemostasis., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to investigate the lesion and endoscopist factors associated with unintentional endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (uniEPMR) of colorectal lesions ≥ 10 mm. uniEPMR was defined from the medical record as anything other than a preoperatively planned EPMR. Factors leading to uniEPMR were identified by retrospective univariate and multivariate analyses of lesions ≥ 10 mm (adenoma including sessile serrated lesion and carcinoma) that were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) at three hospitals. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the number of cases treated by each endoscopist. A learning curve (LC) was created for each lesion size based on the number of experienced cases and the percentage of uniEPMR. Of 2557 lesions, 327 lesions underwent uniEPMR. The recurrence rate of uniEPMR was 2.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that lesion diameter ≥ 30 mm (odds ratio 11.83, 95% confidence interval 6.80-20.60, p < 0.0001) was the most associated risk factor leading to uniEPMR. In the LC analysis, the proportion of uniEPMR decreased for lesion sizes of 10-19 mm until 160 cases. The proportion of uniEPMR decreased with the number of experienced cases in the 20-29 mm range, while there was no correlation between the number of experienced cases and the proportion of uniEPMR ≥ 30 mm. These results suggest that 160 cases seem to be the minimum number of cases needed to be proficient in en bloc EMR. Additionally, while lesion sizes of 10-29 mm are considered suitable for EMR, lesion sizes ≥ 30 mm are not applicable for en bloc EMR from the perspective of both lesion and endoscopist factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of 21-30 mm colonic polyps., Method: We conducted a single-center RCT. Patients diagnosed with suspected colorectal intramucosal carcinoma (21-30 mm and adaptable for both UEMR and ESD) were randomly assigned to the UEMR and ESD groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. We independently performed one-sample tests against the set threshold for each treatment. The significance level was set at p = 0.224., Result: Eleven polyps each in the UEMR and ESD groups, respectively, were analyzed. The R0 resection rate (%) was 36 (95% confidence interval 11-69) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.002). The p-value against the set threshold for UEMR was 0.743, whereas that for ESD was < 0.001 (one-sample binomial test). The en bloc resection rates (%) were 82 (48-97) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively; however, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.167). The mean treatment time (min) was significantly shorter in the UEMR group (8 ± 6) than in the ESD group (48 ± 29) (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: ESD could achieve a high R0 resection rate, while the en bloc resection rate was comparable between the two treatment techniques with less burden on patients undergoing UEMR for 21-30-mm colorectal polyps., Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial as jRCT1030210015 and jRCT1030210177., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background & Aims: This study examined the additional value of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) on magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy (M-NBI) in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps., Methods: A multicenter prospective study was conducted at 9 facilities in Japan and Germany. Patients with colorectal polyps scheduled for resection were included. Optical diagnosis was performed by M-NBI first, followed by MCE. Both diagnoses were made in real time. MCE was performed on all type 2B lesions classified according to the Japan NBI Expert Team classification and other lesions at the discretion of endoscopists. The diagnostic accuracy and confidence of M-NBI and MCE for colorectal cancer (CRC) with deep invasion (≥T1b) were compared on the basis of histologic findings after resection., Results: In total, 1173 lesions were included between February 2018 and December 2020, with 654 (5 hyperplastic polyp/sessile serrated lesion, 162 low-grade dysplasia, 403 high-grade dysplasia, 97 T1 CRCs, and 32 ≥T2 CRCs) examined using MCE after M-NBI. In the diagnostic accuracy for predicting CRC with deep invasion, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for M-NBI were 63.1%, 94.2%, 61.6%, 94.5%, and 90.2%, respectively, and for MCE they were 77.4%, 93.2%, 62.5%, 96.5%, and 91.1%, respectively. The sensitivity was significantly higher in MCE (P < .001). However, these additional values were limited to lesions with low confidence in M-NBI or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC by M-NBI., Conclusions: In this multicenter prospective study, we demonstrated the additional value of MCE on M-NBI. We suggest that additional MCE be recommended for lesions with low confidence or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC. Trials registry number: UMIN000031129., (Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to investigate the validity of pathological diagnosis of early CRC (E-CRC) from the genetic background by comparing data of E-CRC to colorectal adenoma (CRA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) on advanced CRC (AD-CRC)., Methods: TCGA data on AD-CRC were studied in silico, whereas by next-generation sequencer, DNA target sequences were performed for endoscopically obtained CRA and E-CRC samples. Immunohistochemical staining of mismatch repair genes and methylation of MLH1 was also performed. The presence of oncogenic mutation according to OncoKB for the genes of the Wnt, MAPK, and cell-cycle-signaling pathways was compared among CRA, E-CRC, and AD-CRC., Results: The study included 22 CRA and 30 E-CRC lesions from the Chiba University Hospital and 212 AD-CRC lesions from TCGA data. Regarding the number of lesions with driver mutations in the Wnt and cell-cycle-signaling pathways, E-CRC was comparable to AD-CRC, but was significantly greater than CRA. CRA had significantly more lesions with a driver mutation for the Wnt signaling pathway only, versus E-CRC., Conclusions: In conclusion, the definition of E-CRC according to the Japanese criteria had a different genetic profile from CRA and was more similar to AD-CRC. Based on the main pathway, it seemed reasonable to classify E-CRC as adenocarcinoma. The pathological diagnosis of E-CRC according to Japanese definition seemed to be valid from a genetic point of view., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Aims: Endoscopic treatment is recommended for low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and colorectal cancer (CRC) with submucosal (SM) invasion <1000 μm. However, diagnosis of invasion depth requires experience and is often difficult. This study developed and evaluated a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to determine whether endoscopic treatment is appropriate for colorectal lesions using only white-light endoscopy (WLE)., Methods: We extracted 3442 images from 1035 consecutive colorectal lesions (105 LGDs, 377 HGDs, 107 CRCs with SM <1000 μm, 146 CRCs with SM ≥1000 μm, and 300 advanced CRCs). All images were WLE, nonmagnified, and nonstained. We developed a novel CAD system using 2751 images; the remaining 691 images were evaluated by the CAD system as a test set. The capability of the CAD system to distinguish endoscopically treatable lesions and untreatable lesions was assessed and compared with the results from 2 trainees and 2 experts., Results: The CAD system distinguished endoscopically treatable from untreatable lesions with 96.7% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and 90.3% accuracy. These values were significantly higher than those from trainees (92.1%, 67.6%, and 84.9%; P < .01, <.01, and <.01, respectively) and were comparable with those from experts (96.5%, 72.5%, and 89.4%, respectively). Trainees assisted by the CAD system demonstrated a diagnostic capability comparable with that of experts., Conclusions: The CAD system had good diagnostic capability for making treatment decisions for colorectal lesions. This system may enable a more convenient and accurate diagnosis using only WLE., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe treatment for colorectal adenomas. However, the R0 resection rate is not sufficiently high because of inadequate resection of muscularis mucosa. We hypothesized that CSP in an underwater environment could improve this procedure by helping to safely achieve resection containing the muscularis mucosa. We have named this procedure underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of UCSP for colorectal adenomas., Methods: Between May 2017 and April 2018, patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomas <9 mm underwent UCSP. After follow-up colonoscopy 3 weeks later, the patients post-UCSP scars were biopsied. Outcomes were compared with those of a historical control group who underwent conventional CSP in our previous study using propensity score-matching methods., Results: Overall, 224 lesions in 65 patients were prospectively resected by UCSP. Pathologically, 209 lesions were adenomas (4.5 ± 1.5 mm) including one intramucosal carcinoma. Only one pathological residual adenoma was identified, but there was no significant difference in the residual rate between the UCSP and CSP groups (both 1.0%). No complications were observed. R0 resection rate and rate of area containing the muscularis mucosa in the UCSP group were significantly higher than those in the CSP group (80.2% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001; 50.0% vs 35.3%, P = 0.015)., Conclusion: Underwater cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal adenomas was safe and effective from the perspective of pathological complete resection, which is likely facilitated by achieving an adequate depth of resection., (© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of a prepackaged low-residue diet (PLD) compared with a restricted diet (RD) for colonoscopic bowel preparation., Method: A prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out with patients undergoing colonoscopy. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to PLD and RD groups. In the RD group, the patients received an information sheet containing acceptable low-residue options and instructions from the medical staff. All patients received 10 ml sodium picosulphate the day before colonoscopy and 1 l of polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG-A) on the day of the colonoscopy. If the bowel preparation was not adequate, an additional PEG-A solution was given. The primary outcome was the efficacy of colonic cleansing as rated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The additional amount of PEG-A solution, adenoma detection rate and patient tolerance were assessed as secondary outcomes., Results: The BBPS score in the PLD group was 7.3 ± 1.7 compared with 6.5 ± 1.7 in the RD group. The quality of bowel preparation was significantly better in the PLD group (P < 0.05). The mean amount of additional PEG-A solution in the PLD group was smaller than in the RD group (293.8 ± 474.8 vs 444.1 ± 625.0 ml), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. Adenoma detection rates and patient tolerance were similar in the two groups., Conclusion: Prepackaged low-residue diets PLD is superior to RD for bowel preparation for colonoscopy., (Colorectal Disease © 2015 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are generally defined as lesions >10 mm in diameter, are characterized by lateral expansion along the luminal wall with a low vertical axis. In contrast to other forms of tumor, LSTs are generally considered to have a superficial growth pattern and the potential for malignancy. We focused on this morphological character of LSTs, and analyzed the gene expression profile of LSTs., Methods: The expression of 168 genes in 41 colorectal tumor samples (17 LST-adenoma, 12 LST-carcinoma, 12 Ip [pedunculated type of the Paris classification)-adenoma, all of which were 10 mm or more in diameter] was analyzed by PCR array. Based on the results, we investigated the expression levels of genes up-regulated in LST-adenoma, compared to Ip-adenoma, by hierarchical and K-means clustering. To confirm the results of the array analysis, using an additional 60 samples (38 LST-adenoma, 22 Ip-adenoma), we determined the localization of the gene product by immunohistochemical staining., Result: The expression of 129 genes differed in colorectal tumors from normal mucosa by PCR array analysis. As a result of K-means clustering, the expression levels of five genes, AKT1, BCL2L1, ERBB2, MTA2 and TNFRSF25, were found to be significantly up-regulated (p < 0.05) in LST-adenoma, compared to Ip-adenoma. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the BCL2L1 protein was significantly and meaningfully up-regulated in LST-adenoma compared to Ip-adenoma (p = 0.010). With respect to apoptosis status in LST-Adenoma, it assumes that BCL2L1 is anti-apoptotic protein, the samples such as BCL2L1 positive and TUNEL negative, or BCL2L1 negative and TUNEL positive are consistent with the assumption. 63.2 % LST-adenoma samples were consistent with the assumption., Conclusions: LSTs have an unusual profile of gene expression compared to other tumors and BCL2L1 might be concerned in the organization of LSTs.

Background: It is well known that in patients with sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenoma/carcinoma (SNADA) with no polyposis syndrome, including familial adenomataous polyposis, the rates of colorectal adenoma/carcinoma are high. However, the prevalence rates of other tumor types, for example, gastric cancer, in SNADA patients remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to analyze the prevalence rate of comorbid diseases in SNADA patients., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients with SNADA treated by endoscopic resection between May 2005 and September 2014 at our institution., Results: Overall, 51 of the 78 (65.4%) SNADA patients had comorbid colorectal adenoma/carcinoma. Further, 10 of the 78 (12.8%) SNADA patients had comorbid gastric cancer, and all of them were positive for Helicobacter pylori infection. SNADA lesions were located significantly more frequently at the oral side of the major papilla in patients with H. pylori infection than in those without H. pylori infection (27 of 36 [75.0%] vs. 19 of 42 [45.2%], p = 0.008, chi-square test). In contrast, SNADA lesions were located significantly more frequently at the anal side of the major papilla in patients with colorectal adenoma/carcinoma than in those without colorectal adenoma/carcinoma (27 of 51 [52.9%] vs. 5 of 27 [18.5%], p = 0.003, chi-square test)., Conclusion: SNADA patients showed comorbidity with not only colorectal adenoma/carcinoma but also gastric cancer. H. pylori infection is known to cause gastric cancer and may influence tumorigenesis of SNADA lesions at the oral side of the major papilla.