Search

Background/Aims: Settings of structure and color enhancement (CE) change view of white light imaging and a preset low enhancement setting is used regularly. The aim of this study was to investigate whether higher enhancement settings increased colorectal lesions' visibility with endoscopists' visibility scoring and objective color difference (CD) value. Methods: From April 2015 to September 2015, we analyzed 27 pictures and 100 videos of colorectal lesions. Combinations of structure enhancement (B3, A3, A5) and CE (CE 0, 1, 3) were evaluated and CD values of 2 corresponding modes (high enhancement: A5 + CE3, preset low enhancement: A3 + CE0) were calculated using marketed software. In the video, these 2 modes were evaluated. All pictures and movies were graded by 4 endoscopists using visibility scores: score 4 (excellent) to score 1 (poor). Results: The scores of A3 + CE0 (2.74 ± 1.09) were significantly lower than those of all other higher enhancement settings such as B3 + CE1 (3.11 ± 1.08), A3 + CE1 (3.33 ± 0.91), and A5 + CE3 (3.56 ± 0.74; p < 0.001). The CD value of A5 + CE3 was significantly higher than A3 + CE0 (20.2 ± 6.9 vs. 12.9 ± 5.6, p < 0.001). In the video, the scores for A5 + CE3 were significantly higher than A3 + CE0 (3.27 ± 0.83 vs. 2.53 ± 1.05, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Higher enhancement settings increased visibility of colorectal lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effects of linked-color imaging (LCI) on colorectal lesion detection and colonoscopy quality remain controversial. This study compared the detection rates of adenoma and other precursor lesions using LCI vs white-light imaging (WLI) during screening, diagnostic, and surveillance colonoscopies. This randomized controlled trial was performed at 11 institutions in 4 Asian countries/regions. Patients with abdominal symptoms, a primary screening colonoscopy, positive fecal immunochemical test results, or undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the LCI or high-definition WLI group. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate, advanced ADR, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, and the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy. The recommended surveillance schedule distribution after trial colonoscopy was analyzed. Between November 2020 and January 2022, there were 3050 participants (LCI, n = 1527; WLI, n = 1523) recruited. The LCI group ADR was significantly higher than the WLI group ADR using intention-to-treat (58.7% vs 46.7%; P <.01) and per-protocol analyses (59.6% vs 46.4%; P <.01). The LCI group polyp detection rates (68.6% vs 59.5%; P <.01), SSL detection rates (4.8% vs 2.8%; P <.01), and adenomas per colonoscopy (1.48 vs 1.02; P <.01) also were significantly higher. However, the advanced ADR was not significantly different (13.2% vs 11.0%; P =.06). Significantly more patients in the LCI group had shorter recommended surveillance schedules than the WLI group (P <.01). Compared with WLI, LCI improved adenoma and other polyp detection rates, including SSLs, resulting in alteration of the recommended surveillance schedule after screening, diagnostic, and postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopies. Trial registration number: UMIN000042432 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm). [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim Cold snare polypectomy ( CSP) is commonly used for treating colorectal polyps <10 mm in diameter. We evaluated the analysis and safety of CSP for larger polyps. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1006 colorectal polyps resected with CSP. Indication for CSP was polyps 2-14 mm that were diagnosed as benign neoplastic polyp by magnifying endoscopy. Various clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors for failure of complete CSP resection. With respect to polyp size, we compared the therapeutic outcomes between polyps <10 mm and ≥10 mm. Additionally, the presence of muscularis mucosa in resected specimens was analyzed. Results Rates of en bloc resection and postoperative hemorrhage were 98.8% and 0.1%, respectively. Seven hundred and ninety-one neoplastic lesions were analyzed and negative margins were found in 70.5% of the lesions, Multivariate analysis showed that non-polypoid morphology, histology of intramucosal cancer + high-grade adenoma and sessile serrated adenoma and polyp were significant factors for incomplete resection. With respect to the difference between lesions ≥10 mm than in those <10 mm, rates of cancer and positive/unclear margins were significantly higher (5.0% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001; 40.6% vs 27.7%, P = 0.007) in the ≥10 mm with rates of postoperative hemorrhage not significantly different (0.8% vs 0.0%). Additionally, the loss of muscularis mucosa was found in 27.8% of all lesions. Conclusion CSP is a safe procedure for polyps 2-14 mm. However, CSP has limitations in terms of the histopathological margin and loss of muscularis mucosa in specimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim There are limited studies on incidence rates of metachronous neoplastic lesions after resecting large colorectal polyps. In the present study, we analyzed metachronous lesions after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥20 mm in size. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of polyps from 2006 to 2013 at two affiliated hospitals. All patients underwent at least two total colonoscopies before follow up to ensure minimal missed polyps. Only patients who had follow-up colonoscopy annually after resection were recruited. We separated patients according to size of polyp resected; there were 239 patients in the ≥20-mm group and 330 patients in the <20-mm group. Clinical characteristics and cumulative rates of metachronous advanced adenoma and cancer in both groups were analyzed. Advanced adenoma was defined as a neoplastic lesion ≥10 mm in size and adenoma with a villous component. Results Cumulative rate of development of metachronous advanced adenoma and cancer in the ≥20-mm group was significantly higher than in the <20-mm group (22.9% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001) at 36 months. There was also more development of small polyps 5-9 mm in the ≥20-mm group than in the <20-mm group (45.2% vs 28.8%, P < 0.001). With respect to metachronous lesions, there were more right-sided colonic lesions in the ≥20-mm group than in the <20-mm group (78.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.015). Conclusion High incidence rates of development of metachronous neoplastic lesions were detected after resection of colorectal polyps ≥20 mm in size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: This study aimed to analyze the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a novel uniquely shaped, double-loop snare (Dualoop, Medico's Hirata Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for colorectal polyps. Methods: This was a clinical trial conducted in two referral centers, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan. First, the firmness of various snares including 'Dualoop' was experimentally analyzed with a pressure gauge. Five hundred and eighty nine consecutive polyps that underwent EMR with 'Dualoop' were compared to 339 polyps with the standard round snare. Lesion characteristics, en bloc resection, and complications were analyzed. Results: 'Dualoop' had the most firmness among the various snares. The average tumor size was 9.3 mm (5-30), and en bloc resection was achieved in 95.4%. The rate of en bloc resection for middle polyps 15-19 mm in diameter was significantly higher with the 'Dualoop' than that with the round snare (97.9 vs. 80.0%, p < 0.05). The rate of en bloc resection was 64.7% for large polyps ≥20 mm in diameter using 'Dualoop'. Higher age, larger tumor size, and superficial polyps were associated with the failure of en bloc resection. Conclusion: EMR with 'Dualoop' was effective for resecting both middle and large polyps en-bloc. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A new endoscope system with a laser light source, blue laser imaging ( BLI), has been developed by Fujifilm that allows for narrow-band light observation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of BLI for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 314 colorectal polyps that were examined with BLI observation at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine between September 2011 and January 2013. The surface and vascular patterns of polyps detected by published narrow-band imaging magnification: Hiroshima classification were used. Correlations were determined between the classifications and the histopathological diagnoses. Additionally, the ability of BLI without magnification to differentiate between neoplastic or non-neoplastic polyps was analyzed. Results A total of 41 hyperplastic polyps, 168 adenomas, 80 intramucosal cancer, 11 shallowly invaded submucosal cancer, and 14 deeply invaded submucosal cancer were analyzed.Hyperplastic polyp was observed in 100% of Type A lesions (39 lesions), adenoma was observed in 89.3% of Type B lesions (159 lesions), intramucosal cancer and shallowly invaded submucosal cancer was observed in 69.6% of Type C1 (92 lesions) and in 84.6% of Type C2 (13 lesions), and deeply invaded submucosal cancer was observed in 81.8% of Type C3 lesions (11 lesions). The overall diagnostic accuracy of BLI with magnification was 84.3%. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of BLI without magnification for differentiating between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps <10 mm in diameter was 95.2%, which was greater than that of white light (83.2%). Conclusion BLI was useful for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Adequate mucosal elevation by submucosal injection is important for definitive en bloc resection and prevention of perforation during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of 0.13% hyaluronic acid (HA) solution for high and sustained mucosal elevation during colorectal EMR. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial; a total of 196 patients with colon polyps of < 20 mm diameter were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo EMR using either 0.13% HA or normal saline (NS). The primary outcome of the study was histopathologically confirmed complete resection. The secondary outcomes such as maintenance of high mucosal elevation and development of complications were also evaluated. Moreover, the relationship between complete resection and the experience of the endoscopist (veteran vs less experienced) was analyzed. Results: Compete resection was achieved in 74 of 93 polyps (79.5%) in the 0.13% HA group and 63 of 96 polyps (65.6%) in the NS group ( P < 0.05). High mucosal elevation was maintained in 83.9% of procedures in the 0.13% HA group and 54.1% in the NS group ( P < 0.01). The frequency of complete resection achieved by less-experienced endoscopists was higher in the 0.13% HA group (79.3%) than in the NS group (62.1%; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoscopic mucosal resection using 0.13% HA to colon polyps of less than 20 mm diameter is more effective than NS for complete resection and maintenance of mucosal elevation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]