Search

Aims We have previously shown that the combination of pravastatin and sarpogrelate is synergistically beneficial for atherosclerosis. In this study, we investigated whether the pravastatin-sarpogrelate combination was sufficient for treatment in an old mouse model of atherosclerosis or if additional intervention would be needed to address the newly included aging factor and its complex pathophysiological impact on the atherosclerogenic state. We added an anti- TNF biological to the combination treatment cocktail because of the known pathologic roles of TNF in the aging process. Methods Sixty-week-old low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet and treated with the sarpogrelate and pravastatin combination, etanercept alone, or the triple combination. Results Although, etanercept alone did not significantly reduce aortic root and atherosclerotic plaque areas, the pravastatin-sarpogrelate combination, and pravastatin-sarpogrelate-etanercept triple therapy significantly reduced the plaque areas. Surprisingly, TNF inhibition was critically required to reduce the plaque areas of aortic roots and the expression of ICAM-1, MOMA-2, and TNF. More importantly, a lipid-lowering effect by pravastatin was observed only in the triple therapy group and not in the pravastatin and sarpogrelate combination group. Conclusions These results suggest that TNF-inhibitory intervention should be added to the conventional therapy as a novel strategy for treating the elderly patients with atherosclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Aims: Despite the therapeutic efficacy of statins and antiplatelet agents for atherosclerosis, monotherapy with each drug alone is often insufficient to achieve the patient's therapeutic goals. We previously showed that combined statin/antiplatelet agent/anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent therapy (pravastatin/sarpogrelate/etanercept) reduces atherosclerotic lesions by inhibiting TNF, an atherogenic cytokine that contributes to the progression of arteriosclerosis. In addition, our previous study showed that combined treatment with pravastatin and cilostazol is effective for reducing TNF‐driven inflammation through anti‐TNF activity. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the additive effects of combined pravastatin and cilostazol therapy on atherosclerotic progression using low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) knockout (KO) mice. Methods: Ten‐week‐old LDLR KO mice were fed a high‐fat, high‐cholesterol diet and orally administered pravastatin and cilostazol alone or in combination. Body weight, plasma lipid levels, and the levels of intracellular adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokines were analyzed. In addition, aortas and aortic roots were stained with Oil Red O, and atherosclerotic plaques were quantified. Results: The atherosclerotic plaques in the combined pravastatin and cilostazol treatment groups were significantly reduced compared to those in each drug monotherapy group. The combination therapy group also showed the downregulation of ICAM‐1, MOMA‐2, TNF, interleukin (IL)‐6, triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low‐density lipoprotein levels and the upregulation of high‐density lipoprotein levels compared to those of the pravastatin‐ or cilostazol‐treated groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that combination therapy with pravastatin and cilostazol exerts beneficial effects by decreasing atherosclerotic lesion progression and improving the pro‐inflammatory state in the vascular endothelium. These effects are mediated by the reduction in adhesion molecule expression, immune cell infiltration, and cytokine levels and the antiatherosclerotic modulation of serum cholesterol levels. Therefore, we conclude that combined treatment with pravastatin and cilostazol may be a more effective antiatherosclerotic strategy than treatment with either agent alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) induces contrasting immune responses depending on its binding receptor subunit; thus, selective receptor binding is considered a key challenge in cancer therapeutic strategies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the inhibition of IL-2 action and antitumor activity of celastrol (CEL), a compound identified in a screen for IL-2/CD25 binding inhibitors, and to elucidate the underlying role of CEL in immune cells. We found that CEL selectively impairs the binding of IL-2 and CD25 and directly binds to IL-2 but not to CD25. CEL significantly suppressed the proliferation and signaling of IL-2-dependent murine T cells and interfered with IL-2-responsive STAT5 phosphorylation in IL-2 reporter cells and human PBMCs. After confirming the impact of CEL on IL-2, we evaluated its antitumor activity in C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 tumors and found that CEL significantly inhibited tumor growth by increasing CD8+ T cells. We also found that CEL did not inhibit tumor growth in T cell-deficient BALB/c nude mice, suggesting that its activity was mediated by the T-cell response. Moreover, combination therapy with low-dose CEL and a TNFR2 antagonist synergistically improved the therapeutic efficacy of the individual monotherapies by increasing the ratio of intratumoral CD8/Treg cells and suppressing Foxp3 expression. These findings suggest that CEL, which inhibits CD25 binding by targeting IL-2, exerts antitumor activity by mediating the T-cell response and could be a promising candidate for combination therapy in cancer immunotherapy against melanoma. • CEL selectively impairs the binding of IL-2 and CD25 by targeting IL-2. • CEL did not inhibit tumor growth in the T-cell-deficient BALB/c nude mice. • CEL exerts antitumor activity through CD8+ T cell response in melanoma. • CEL may be a promising candidate for combination therapy in cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Pravastatin and cilostazol are used as lipid-lowering and antiplatelet agents, respectively. Regarding their well-known anti-inflammatory effects, the additive effect of the two drugs on anti-TNF functions has not yet been investigated. In the present investigation, the beneficial effect of combined pravastatin and cilostazol on their anti-TNF activities was assessed using an in vivo mouse model. Methods: Mice were pretreated with pravastatin and/or cilostazol (40 mg/kg of each), orally once two hour prior to an LPS (5 mg/kg, i.p.) challenge. One hour post challenge, blood and descending aorta were collected for serum TNF levels and immune cell infiltration analyses. For survival analysis, pravastatin and/or cilostazol (40 mg/kg of each) were administered 30 minutes prior to d-galactosamine administration (700 mg/kg, i.p.) and TNF (10 µg/kg, i.p.) challenge and mice survival was monitored. We also examined the effect of either drug or the combination of drugs on TNF-mediated MAPK and NF-κB signaling, using Western blot analysis. Results: Combined treatment of pravastatin and cilostazol significantly decreased serum TNF release and immune cell infiltration in the descending aorta following LPS administration, compared to each single treatment. Additionally, the combined drugs significantly decreased TNF-mediated mouse mortality and downregulated TNF-induced MAPK and NF-κB activation. Conclusions: These findings suggest that combined pravastatin and cilostazol is more effective for reducing TNF-driven inflammation through their anti-TNF activity than monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]