Search

Typically, screening collections of pharmaceutical companies contain more than a million compounds today. However, for certain high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns, constraints posed by the assay throughput and/or the reagent costs make it impractical to screen the entire deck. Therefore, it is desirable to effectively screen subsets of the collection based on a hypothesis or a diversity selection. How to select compound subsets is a subject of ongoing debate. The authors present an approach based on extended connectivity fingerprints to carry out diversity selection on a per plate basis (instead of a per compound basis). HTS data from 35 Novartis screens spanning 5 target classes were investigated to assess the performance of this approach. The analysis shows that selecting a fingerprint-diverse subset of 250K compounds, representing 20% of the screening deck, would have achieved significantly higher hit rates for 86% of the screens. This measure also outperforms the Murcko scaffold-based plate selection described previously, where only 49% of the screens showed similar improvements. Strikingly, the 2-fold improvement in average hit rates observed for 3 of 5 target classes in the data set indicates a target bias of the plate (and thus compound) selection method. Even though the diverse subset selection lacks any target hypothesis, its application shows significantly better results for some targets-namely, G-protein-coupled receptors, proteases, and protein-protein interactions-but not for kinase and pathway screens. The synthetic origin of the compounds in the diverse subset appears to influence the screening hit rates. Natural products were the most diverse compound class, with significantly higher hit rates compared to the compounds from the traditional synthetic and combinatorial libraries. These results offer empirical guidelines for plate-based diversity selection to enhance hit rates, based on target class and the library type being screened.

Development of a pharmacophore hypothesis related to small-molecule activity is pivotal to chemical optimization of a series, since it defines features beneficial or detrimental to activity. Although crystal structures may provide detailed 3D interaction information for one molecule with its receptor, docking a different ligand to that model often leads to unreliable results due to protein flexibility. Graham Richards' lab was one of the first groups to utilize "fuzzy" pattern recognition algorithms taken from the field of image processing to solve problems in protein modeling. Thus, descriptor "fuzziness" was partly able to emulate conformational flexibility of the target while simultaneously enhancing the speed of the search. In this work, we extend these developments to a ligand-based method for describing and aligning molecules in flexible chemical space termed FEature POint PharmacophoreS (FEPOPS), which allows exploration of dynamic biological space. We develop a novel, combinatorial algorithm for molecular comparisons and evaluate it using the WOMBAT dataset. The new approach shows superior retrospective virtual screening performance than earlier shape-based or charge-based algorithms. Additionally, we use target prediction to evaluate how FEPOPS alignments match the molecules biological activity by identifying the atoms and features that make the key contributions to overall chemical similarity. Overall, we find that FEPOPS are sufficiently fuzzy and flexible to find not only new ligand scaffolds, but also challenging molecules that occupy different conformational states of dynamic biological space as from induced fits.

Chemogenomics comprises a systematic relationship between targets and ligands that are used as target modulators in living systems such as cells or organisms. In recent years, data on small molecule-bioactivity relationships have become increasingly available, and consequently so have the number of approaches used to translate bioactivity data into knowledge. This review will focus on two aspects of chemogenomics. Firstly, in cases such as cell-based screens, the question of which target(s) a compound is modulating in order to cause the observed phenotype is crucial. In silico target prediction tools can suggest likely biological targets of small molecules via data mining in target-annotated chemical databases. This review presents some of the current tools available for this task and shows some sample applications relevant to a pharmaceutical industry setting. These applications are the prediction of false-positives in cell-based reporter gene assays, the prediction of targets by linking bioassay data with protein domain annotations, and the direct prediction of adverse reactions. Secondly, in recent years a shift from structure-derived chemical descriptors to biological descriptors has occurred. Here, the effect of a compound on a number of biological endpoints is used to make predictions about other properties, such as putative targets, associated adverse reactions, and pathways modulated by the compound. This review further summarizes these "performance" descriptors and their applications, focusing on gene expression profiles and high-content screening data. The advent of such biological fingerprints suggests that the field of drug discovery is currently at a crossroads, where single target bioassay results are supplanted by multidimensional biological fingerprints that reflect a new awareness of biological networks and polypharmacology.

This work describes a novel semi-sequential technique for in silico enhancement of high-throughput screening (HTS) experiments now employed at Novartis. It is used in situations in which the size of the screen is limited by the readout (e.g., high-content screens) or the amount of reagents or tools (proteins or cells) available. By performing computational chemical diversity selection on a per plate basis (instead of a per compound basis), 25% of the 1,000,000-compound screening was optimized for general initial HTS. Statistical models are then generated from target-specific primary results (percentage inhibition data) to drive the cherry picking and testing from the entire collection. Using retrospective analysis of 11 HTS campaigns, the authors show that this method would have captured on average two thirds of the active compounds (IC(50) < 10 microM) and three fourths of the active Murcko scaffolds while decreasing screening expenditure by nearly 75%. This result is true for a wide variety of targets, including G-protein-coupled receptors, chemokine receptors, kinases, metalloproteinases, pathway screens, and protein-protein interactions. Unlike time-consuming "classic" sequential approaches that require multiple iterations of cherry picking, testing, and building statistical models, here individual compounds are cherry picked just once, based directly on primary screening data. Strikingly, the authors demonstrate that models built from primary data are as robust as models built from IC(50) data. This is true for all HTS campaigns analyzed, which represent a wide variety of target classes and assay types.