Search

BACKGROUND: Return to school is key for community re-integration after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). School support facilitates and ensure a successful transition back to school. However, access to school services is not uniform among U.S. children. OBJECTIVE: To describe school services for children with TBI from minoritized backgrounds and highlight population-specific risk factors and facilitators for accessing services. METHODS: Narrative review of the literature including studies on return to school after a mild-complicated, moderate, or severe TBI, among children enrolled in the U.S. school system. We describe receipt of services, enabling and risk factors, and outcomes, for minority children. RESULTS: There is a gap in knowledge regarding return to school among minoritized children with TBIs. Studies have few participants from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds, or low income or rural communities. Transgender and non-binary youth are not represented in present research efforts. Studies highlight larger barriers to receipt of school services among minority children and additional barriers associated with their minority status. CONCLUSION: Diversity in the U.S pediatric population is increasing. Minoritized populations are at increased risk for TBI and poor outcomes. Research focused on the needs of these populations is required to optimize school return after TBI hospitalization and overall post-discharge care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

All but one U.S. state has passed legislation requiring that concussion information be provided to parents of youth participants in school-sponsored sport. Such information should be accessible and easily understood if it is to be used by parents to make informed decisions regarding their children's health and safety. Accessing and understanding information about concussion may be challenging for parents who lack fluency in English. The current study sought to describe the extent and nature of Spanish-language concussion information available on the websites of U.S. public high school athletic associations. We also examined information provided by leading youth sports and health organizations as well as the top U.S. children's hospitals. We sought to quantify the proportion of these websites with Spanish-language translation of concussion education materials and describe the readability, accessibility, and completeness of these translations. Only one quarter of the websites examined contained any concussion information in Spanish, and none of these websites offered a mirrored Spanish-language translation. Spanish information was also difficult to access, with the search process requiring English-language ability. Finally, the readability of the concussion information in both English and Spanish was higher than recommended guidelines. Our findings suggest that non-English-speaking parents may be inadequately informed about concussion because translation of concussion educational materials is absent, incomplete, or hard to access. This raises questions about whether they are able to provide informed consent for their children's participation in contact sport and suggests the need for improved translation of such informational materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors conducted an Email survey of their medical staff to explore the attitudes, patterns of recommendation, and communication of pediatric providers about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a large metropolitan children’s hospital. Two thirds of the respondents reported awareness about their patients’ CAM therapy use (65%) and recommended CAM therapy to their patients (67%). Providers who reported personal use of CAM (71%) were more likely to recommend CAM to their patients compared with those who do not (76% vs 45%; P < .05). One half of pediatric providers reported occasional consultation with their patient’s CAM provider, but bidirectional communication was rare (4%). Specific changes in care based on a CAM provider’s recommendations were also unusual (4%). Despite the positive attitudes about and willingness to recommend CAM by pediatric providers, communication between these clinicians and CAM providers may be less than ideal. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]