Search

This study examined the geographical distribution of home- and community-based services (HCBS) resources in Taiwan's Long-Term Care 2.0 policy and explored its association with the number of deaths among older adults. The main outcome of the study was determination of the number of deaths among older adults in townships ( N = 346) in 2021. The results showed that home-based HCBS had a significant positive association with mortality among older adults; moreover, community-based and complementary services, which are highly clustered within a township and among its neighbors, exert a significant protective effect on mortality among older adults. Stratified analyses showed a significantly lower mortality among older adults using adult foster care and transportation services, but a significantly higher mortality among older adults using home-based professional care and respite care services, after considering the sociodemographic characteristics of older adults, urbanization, and the number of long-term care resources in the spatial analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We aimed to understand the relationships between care recipients' profiles and home- and community-based services (HCBS use patterns. Data were from the 2010 to 2013 Long-Term Care Service Management System in Taiwan ( N = 78,205). We used latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression analyses. Three HCBS use patterns were found. Care recipients who lived alone, lived in less urbanized areas, and had instrumental activities of daily living disabilities were more likely to be in the home-based personal care group. Those in the home-based personal and medical care group were more likely than others to have a primary caregiver. Care recipients who had poorer abilities at basic activities of daily living and cognitive function, better household income, and lived in a more urbanized area were more likely to be in the non-personal care multiple services group. The findings suggest that policymakers alleviate barriers to accessing various patterns of HCBS should be encouraged.

For its second decade, Taiwan's National 10‐Year Long‐Term Care Plan launched a policy of reinforcing home‐ and community‐based services (HCBSs) with a focus on reablement. This study aimed to (1) identify the distinct service use patterns of reablement‐embedded HCBS and (2) examine the effects of these service patterns on functional improvements among older care recipients, including among groups with different levels of care needs. We collected 2018 data from the Long‐Term Care Service Management System for care recipients in one county located in central Taiwan (N = 4735). Three recipient groups were assigned based on level of care needs. We included data on use of the following services: reablement, home care, respite care, applications for assistive devices and home environmental modifications, transportation to medical appointments and community‐based services. Outcome variables were measured by change scores between successive assessments of activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Latent class analysis and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to analyse relationships between use patterns, participant subgroups and outcomes. Four subgroups of HCBS use patterns were found. Care recipients with low care needs had greater potential to improve their physical function in ADL through reablement‐embedded HCBS. Care recipients in the groups with low and high care needs showed overall benefits in functional improvements in ADL and IADL from personal care–based HCBS. Care recipients in the community‐based and multiple services–based use pattern subgroups showed the least improvement in physical function. Our study indicates that the effects of reablement‐embedded HCBS use strategies may vary among older adults with different levels of care needs. We recommend further research to examine how to design HCBS with a reablement focus to better fit the needs of those with moderate and high levels of care needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study had two aims: (a) to identify the different patterns of use of home- and community-based services (HCBS) among older adults in Taiwan, and (b) to examine the effects of the different use patterns on HCBS recipients' use of institutional long-term care services. The study analyzed cohort data from Taiwan's first National 10-Year Long-Term Care Plan database and from National Health Insurance Claim Data. We extracted baseline information on older adults who were first evaluated for and prescribed HCBS from 2010 through 2013 (N = 71,260). We used latent class analysis to specify the underlying subgroups of recipients with similar patterns of HCBS use. We used hierarchical multinomial logistic regression to examine the effect of the different use patterns on the risk of institutional (e.g., nursing home) placement from 4 to 15 months after initial HCBS evaluation. Four subgroups of HCBS recipients were identified, with patterns of home-based personal care (PC), home-based personal care and medical care (PC/MC), home-based medical care (MC), and community care services. Compared to the home-based PC/MC group, people in the home-based MC group had lower risk (OR = 0.54) and people in the community care group had higher risk (OR = 1.76) of admission to a nursing home. Study findings may provide insights for policy makers regarding the usefulness of integrating medical care and other types of long-term care services into adult day care. • Four subgroups of HCBS service patterns were identified. • The home-based medical care use pattern appears to support aging in place. • Integrate medical care and other long-term care services into community-based care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]