1. Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype.
- Author
-
D'Amours G, Kibar Z, Mathonnet G, Fetni R, Tihy F, Désilets V, Nizard S, Michaud JL, and Lemyre E
- Subjects
- Abnormalities, Multiple diagnosis, Chromosome Aberrations, Fetus, Humans, Intellectual Disability diagnosis, Intellectual Disability genetics, Prenatal Diagnosis, Reproducibility of Results, Abnormalities, Multiple genetics, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Karyotype
- Abstract
Despite a wide range of clinical tools, the etiology of mental retardation and multiple congenital malformations remains unknown for many patients. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has proven to be a valuable tool in these cases, as its pangenomic coverage allows the identification of chromosomal aberrations that are undetectable by other genetic methods targeting specific genomic regions. Therefore, aCGH is increasingly used in clinical genetics, both in the postnatal and the prenatal settings. While the diagnostic yield in the postnatal population has been established at 10-12%, studies investigating fetuses have reported variable results. We used whole-genome aCGH to investigate fetuses presenting at least one major malformation detected on ultrasound, but for whom standard genetic analyses (including karyotype) failed to provide a diagnosis. We identified a clinically significant chromosomal aberration in 8.2% of tested fetuses (4/49), and a result of unclear clinical significance in 12.2% of tested fetuses (6/49). Our results document the value of whole-genome aCGH as a prenatal diagnostic tool and highlight the interpretation difficulties associated with copy number variations of unclear significance., (© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF