Search

BACKGROUND: Health agencies recommend that homes of heat-vulnerable occupants (e.g., older adults) be maintained below 24–28°C to prevent heat-related mortality and morbidity. However, there is limited experimental evidence to support these recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To aid in the development of evidence-based guidance on safe indoor temperatures for temperate continental climates, we evaluated surrogate physiological outcomes linked with heat-related mortality and morbidity in older adults during simulated indoor overheating METHODS: Sixteen older adults [six women; median age: 72 y, interquartile range (IQR): 70-73 y; body mass index: 24.6 (IQR: 22.1-27.0 kg/m²] from the Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, region (warm summer continental climate) completed four randomized, 8-h exposures to conditions experienced indoors during hot weather in continental climates (e.g., Ontario, Canada; 64 participant exposures). Ambient conditions simulated an air-conditioned environment (22°C; control), proposed indoor temperature upper limits (26°C), and temperatures experienced in homes without air-conditioning (31°C and 36°C). Core temperature (rectal) was monitored as the primary outcome; based on previous recommendations, between-condition differences >0.3C were considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: Compared with 22°C, core temperature was elevated to a meaningful extent in 31°C [+0.7C; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5, 0.8] and 36°C (+0.9C; 95% CI: 0.8, 1.1), but not 26°C (+0.2C, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3). Increasing ambient temperatures were also associated with elevated heart rate and reduced arterial blood pressure and heart rate variability at rest, as well as progressive impairments in cardiac and blood pressure responses to standing from supine. DISCUSSION: Core temperature and cardiovascular strain were not appreciably altered following 8-h exposure to 26°C but increased progressively in conditions above this threshold. These data support proposals for the establishment of a 26°C indoor temperature upper limit for protecting vulnerable occupants residing in temperate continental climates from indoor overheating. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a lysosomal storage disease, which can involve the heart, mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The underlying mechanism of disease in AFD is an infiltrative, diffuse process, whereas HCM is a primary heart muscle condition with patchy distribution, which may prompt differences in myocardial mechanics. The aim of this study was to assess myocardial mechanics in AFD according to the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) compared to nonobstructive HCM (NHCM) and healthy controls. Methods and Results: We carried out a single-center, retrospective study in a small, genetically confirmed AFD cohort, which was divided into a subgroup with LVH (LVH+, n = 19), and without LVH (LVH-, n = 21). Comparison groups were healthy controls (n = 40) and NHCM patients (n = 19). Vector Velocity Imaging was applied to two-dimensional echocardiography studies for assessment of longitudinal strain (LS), circumferential strain (CS), and base-to-apex CS gradients. AFD LVH+ patients had lower global LS than AFD LVH- patients (-14 ± 4% vs -17 ± 3%, P < 0.05), but similarly lowered global CS (-24 ± 5% vs -22 ± 5%, P = ns). AFD LVH+ and NHCM had similarly lowered global LS compared to normals, but significantly lower global CS was observed in AFD LVH+ (-24 ± 5% vs -28 ± 4%, P < 0.05), whereas it was significantly increased in NHCM (-31 ± 2% vs -28 ± 4%, P < 0.05). Unlike NHCM, in both AFD subgroups, patients lost their normal base-to-apex CS gradient. Conclusions: AFD patients without LVH already show abnormal systolic myocardial mechanics. Relevant differences in myocardial mechanics between AFD patients with LVH compared to NHCM reflect the different underlying mechanisms of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]