Search

The surgical treatment of isolated medial orbital wall fractures is still a much-debated topic in the literature due to the choice of many surgical accesses. The main options are represented by transcutaneous versus endonasal endoscopic approaches. Our study aims to clarify the role of ethmoidectomy in the pure endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial orbital wall fractures, evaluating the immediate postoperative outcome and its long-term stability. A total of 31 patients affected by isolated medial orbital wall fracture, treated only by endoscopic approach, were included in the study and divided in two groups: (A) 14 patients treated by endoscopic reduction and anterior ethmoidectomy; (B) 17 patients treated by endoscopic reduction and anteroposterior ethmoidectomy. Perioperative and 6-month postoperative follow-up CT scans were performed. With the use of 3D medical software, we evaluated the comparison between the treated orbit and the mirrored contralateral orbit in the two groups, in order to observe the reduction of the fracture. Furthermore, to check the stability of reduction and to evaluate any medial orbital wall changes, we provided a comparison between the 3D CT scan orbital images of immediate postoperative CT and 6-month follow-up. Data obtained showed that the intraoperative surgical reduction was successful in all 31 cases, but it was better in Group B. Stability of the reduction at 6 months was observed in both groups without significant discrepancies. In our opinion, the endonasal endoscopic approach with ethmoidectomy represents a valid and useful technique by which to treat medial orbital wall fractures. The anatomical detail of the buttressing structures of the medial orbital wall, as the second portion of the middle turbinate, grants long-term stability of the surgical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Orbital fracture usually occurs as a result of blunt orbital and facial trauma and may involve ocular injuries. International studies on orbital floor fracture show several differences in epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, surgical treatment modalities, and complication rates; therefore, any comparison should be made with caution. Here we describe an unusual case involving a 19-year-old man with violence-related periorbital trauma, wherein a foreign body (a plastic pen cap) traversed the median wall of the maxillary sinus and penetrated the lower turbinate.Case Presentation: A 19-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our department with localized pain and swelling in the left suborbital region following a physical fight in May 2014. A clinical examination revealed no abnormalities in his eyeballs or eye movement, palpation of the orbital contour revealed no fractures, and ophthalmological evaluation showed no evidence of diplopia. A computed tomography scan revealed fractures in the left orbital floor, periorbital tissue herniation without muscular entrapment and left maxillary hemosinus were observed. A hypodense soft tissue mass was lodged in the left orbital floor, which extended to the median wall of the maxillary sinus and penetrated the left lower turbinate. Surgical exploration of the foreign body was conducted, revealing the foreign body to be a pen cap.Conclusions: History or clinical examination alone may be inadequate to raise the suspicion of a retained periorbital foreign body in a situation of orbital region trauma. Computed tomography is important for the evaluation of periorbital injuries, especially because it could reveal the presence of a foreign body. Periorbital foreign bodies can be observed distinctly on computed tomography, which remains the most sensitive study and should be the first imaging modality in such cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]