Search

To determine the relationship between the uncinate process (UP) and vertebral artery (VA) from a radiologic view and to confirm the surgical safety margin to minimize the risk of VA injury during anterior cervical approaches. We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography angiography of 205 patients by using a contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography protocol of the VA. Four kinds of images were simultaneously reconstructed to measure all the parameters associated with VA and UP of cervical spine. The shortest distance from the UP's tip to the VA's medial border (P < 0.001) was at the C-6 level (2.9 ± 0.9 mm on the left and 3.2 ± 1.3 mm on the right), and the longest distance (P < 0.001) was at the C-3 level on both sides. The distance between UP's tip and the medial border of the ipsilateral VA was statistically significantly different at each cervical level, and the right distance was larger than the left (P < 0.05). We found the height of UP gradually increased from C-3 to C5-level and then decreased from C-5 to C-7 level for both sides. The mean distance between the medial borders of left UP and left VA was on average 7.5 ± 1.4 mm. The diameter of VA was on average 3.4 ± 0.6 mm on the left side and 3.2 ± 0.7 mm on the right. The diameter of the VA was statistically significantly different on both sides, and the left side was larger than the right (P < 0.05). Detailed radiologic anatomy of VA and UP was reviewed in this study. A deep understanding of the correlation between the UP and VA is essential to perform anterior cervical spine surgery safely and ensure adequate spinal canal decompression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The advantages of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) were well published, while research on postoperative results in different subtypes of cervical disk herniation (CDH) still remains blank. This study aimed to explore the surgical outcome between sequestration and other types in CDH. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 108 patients treated with ACDF in our hospital. The participants were divided into two groups according to the existence of a sequestered disk. The Visual analog scale score, the Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) score and the Neck disability index score were used to evaluate postoperative outcome. Results: Significant improvements were observed in both groups at every viewpoint (P < 0.001). The mean JOA was 15.04 ± 1.26 in the sequestered disk group and 14.45 ± 1.43 in the non-sequestered disk group two months after the operation (P = 0.026 < 0.05). The improvement in JOA at two months after ACDF showed a significant difference: 46.58% ± 39.17% in the sequestered disk group and 33.39% ± 28.82% in the non-sequestered disk group (P = 0.047 < 0.05). Thirty-two patients in the sequestered disk group (64%) and 19 patients in the non-sequestered disk group (32.76%) presented with high signal intensity of the spinal cord on preoperative cervical T2-weighted MRI (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with sequestered cervical disks seemed to have a higher degree of symptom improvement two months after ACDF. CDH with a sequestered disk appears to be more likely to cause high signal intensity changes in the compressed cervical spine on T2-weighted MRI. We prefer early positive surgery in patients with sequestered cervical disks from the clinical point of view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]