1. Pilot study of the multicentre DISCHARGE Trial: image quality and protocol adherence results of computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography.
- Author
-
De Rubeis G, Napp AE, Schlattmann P, Geleijns J, Laule M, Dreger H, Kofoed K, Sørgaard M, Engstrøm T, Tilsted HH, Boi A, Porcu M, Cossa S, Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Xavier Valente F, Roque A, Feuchtner G, Plank F, Štěchovský C, Adla T, Schroeder S, Zelesny T, Gutberlet M, Woinke M, Károlyi M, Karády J, Donnelly P, Ball P, Dodd J, Hensey M, Mancone M, Ceccacci A, Berzina M, Zvaigzne L, Sakalyte G, Basevičius A, Ilnicka-Suckiel M, Kuśmierz D, Faria R, Gama-Ribeiro V, Benedek I, Benedek T, Adjić F, Čanković M, Berry C, Delles C, Thwaite E, Davis G, Knuuti J, Pietilä M, Kepka C, Kruk M, Vidakovic R, Neskovic AN, Lecumberri I, Diez Gonzales I, Ruzsics B, Fisher M, Dewey M, and Francone M
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Computed Tomography Angiography methods, Coronary Angiography methods, Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis, Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objective: To implement detailed EU cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) quality criteria in the multicentre DISCHARGE trial (FP72007-2013, EC-GA 603266), we reviewed image quality and adherence to CCTA protocol and to the recommendations of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in a pilot study., Materials and Methods: From every clinical centre, imaging datasets of three patients per arm were assessed for adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the pilot study, predefined standards for the CCTA protocol and ICA recommendations, image quality and non-diagnostic (NDX) rate. These parameters were compared via multinomial regression and ANOVA. If a site did not reach the minimum quality level, additional datasets had to be sent before entering into the final accepted database (FADB)., Results: We analysed 226 cases (150 CCTA/76 ICA). The inclusion/exclusion criteria were not met by 6 of the 226 (2.7%) datasets. The predefined standard was not met by 13 of 76 ICA datasets (17.1%). This percentage decreased between the initial CCTA database and the FADB (multinomial regression, 53 of 70 vs 17 of 75 [76%] vs [23%]). The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the FADB did not improve significantly (ANOVA, p = 0.20; p = 0.09). The CTA NDX rate was reduced, but not significantly (initial CCTA database 15 of 70 [21.4%]) and FADB 9 of 75 [12%]; p = 0.13)., Conclusion: We were able to increase conformity to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and CCTA protocol, improve image quality and decrease the CCTA NDX rate by implementing EU CCTA quality criteria and ICA recommendations., Key Points: • Failure to meet protocol adherence in cardiac CTA was high in the pilot study (77.6%). • Image quality varies between sites and can be improved by feedback given by the core lab. • Conformance with new EU cardiac CT quality criteria might render cardiac CTA findings more consistent and comparable.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF