Search

Recently, researchers have investigated the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generative recommender systems. Existing LLM-based recommender models are trained by adding user and item IDs to a discrete prompt template. However, the disconnect between IDs and natural language makes it difficult for the LLM to learn the relationship between users. To address this issue, we propose a PErsonAlized PrOmpt Distillation (PeaPOD) approach, to distill user preferences as personalized soft prompts. Considering the complexities of user preferences in the real world, we maintain a shared set of learnable prompts that are dynamically weighted based on the user's interests to construct the user-personalized prompt in a compositional manner. Experimental results on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our PeaPOD model on sequential recommendation, top-n recommendation, and explanation generation tasks.

Recent state-of-the-art recommender systems predominantly rely on either implicit or explicit feedback from users to suggest new items. While effective in recommending novel options, many recommender systems often use uninterpretable embeddings to represent user preferences. This lack of transparency not only limits user understanding of why certain items are suggested but also reduces the user's ability to scrutinize and modify their preferences, thereby affecting their ability to receive a list of preferred recommendations. Given the recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), we investigate how a properly crafted prompt can be used to summarize a user's preferences from past reviews and recommend items based only on language-based preferences. In particular, we study how LLMs can be prompted to generate a natural language (NL) user profile that holistically describe a user's preferences. These NL profiles can then be leveraged to fine-tune a LLM using only NL profiles to make transparent and scrutable recommendations. Furthermore, we validate the scrutability of our user profile-based recommender by investigating the impact on recommendation changes after editing NL user profiles. According to our evaluations of the model's rating prediction performance on two benchmarking rating prediction datasets, we observe that this novel approach maintains a performance level on par with established recommender systems in a warm-start setting. With a systematic analysis into the effect of updating user profiles and system prompts, we show the advantage of our approach in easier adjustment of user preferences and a greater autonomy over users' received recommendations., Comment: ACL 2024 (main)