Search

A technique is outlined for utilising a polymeric composite reinforced with glass fibres in a three-dimensional mesh as a post-core in aesthetic cases. The clinical procedure involves obtaining an impression of the root canal space, scanning the definitive cast, and milling a fibre-reinforced composite post-core. Subsequently, the intra-radicular post-core is cemented using an adhesive resin cement. The use of custom-made computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) fibre-reinforced composite post-core facilitates repairability, provides better adaptation to the root canal space, avoids uneven cement thickness, ensures chemical adhesion to resin cement, and promotes favourable aesthetics when combined with all-ceramic crowns., Competing Interests: Declaration of interestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Background and Objectives: There are limited data regarding the behavior of resin matrix ceramics for current CAD-CAM materials. Further studies may be beneficial and can help clinicians planning to use these materials during prosthodontic rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the flexural strength and strain distributions, filler content, wear, and reliability of two resin matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials. Materials and Methods: Two resin matrix ceramics, Ambarino High-Class (AH) and Vita Enamic (VE), were tested for flexural strength (n = 24), wear (n = 10), and reliability (n = 18). Thermogravimetric analysis was used to determine the percentage of filler by weight, and digital image correlation (DIC) was used for strain analysis in flexural strength test. Reliability of each resin matrix ceramic was compared after accelerated lifetime testing of crowns using a two-parameter Weibull distribution. Data of flexural strength, wear, and thermogravimetry were analyzed by independent t-tests with significance level at 5%. Results: The results of DIC analysis were analyzed by a qualitative comparison between the images obtained. The materials tested showed different flexural strength (p < 0.05) and strain distributions. The filler content was the same as informed by manufacturers. No difference was observed in the wear or reliability analysis (p > 0.05). The flexural strength of material AH was superior to VE, and the strain distribution was compatible with this finding. Conclusions: The two resin matrix ceramics tested showed similar behavior in wear and reliability analysis. Both can provide safe use for dental crowns.

Objective: To evaluate the influence of resin-matrix ceramic material and thickness on reliability and stress distribution of occlusal veneers (OV)., Methods: One hundred and twenty-six OV of a mandibular first molar were milled using a CAD/CAM system and allocated according to materials (resin nanoceramic (RNC) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN)) and thicknesses (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mm), totaling six groups (RNC0.5, RNC1, RNC1.5, PICN0.5, PICN1, and PICN1.5). Step-stress accelerated-life testing was performed (n = 21/group) with the load applied at the distobuccal cusp tip of the occlusal veneer until failure or suspension. The use level probability Weibull curves and reliability were calculated and plotted (90% CI). Finite element analysis evaluated the stress distribution according to maximum principal stress (σ max ) on the restoration and maximum shear stress (τ max ) on the cement layer., Results: There was no difference in the probability of survival for the estimated missions among the groups, except at 600 N in which the results were significantly lower to PICN1.5 (6%) compared to RNC1 (55%) and RNC1.5 (60%). The σ max values were higher for PICN (31.85-48.63 MPa) than RNC (30.78-33.09 MPa) in the same thicknesses. In addition, 0.5 mm groups concentrated more stress in the restoration (33.09-48.63 MPa) than 1.0 mm (31.11-35.36 MPa) and 1.5 mm (30.78-31.85 MPa) groups in the same material., Significance: Both resin-matrix ceramic materials seem up-and-coming restorative systems for occlusal veneers irrespective of the thicknesses as a consequence of the high reliability., (Copyright © 2020 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the pullout resistance of CAD/CAM implant-supported crowns cemented with provisional and definitive cements on Ti-base implant abutments., Materials and Methods: Sixty crowns were milled for use in Ti-base implant abutments and divided (n = 15/group) according to material, as follows: (a) [Pr] Temporary acrylic resin; (b) [Co-Cr] Cobalt-Chromium alloy; (c) [Zr] polycrystalline zirconia; and (d) [Ti] titanium. The cementation was performed with RelyX Temp NE (RxT) cement or RelyX U200 self-etching resin cement, under a 50 N (5 kg) load for 10 minutes. Twenty-four hours after cementation, the crowns were subjected to the pullout test in a universal test machine, at a 1.0 mm/min crosshead speed. The tests were performed first without cement to evaluate frictional resistance (Baseline), then with provisional cement (RelyX Temp NE without cement again (Baseline After RxT), and finally with resin cement (U200). The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05)., Results: Data evaluation as a function of cement type demonstrated the superiority of resin-based cements relative to provisional and baseline groups (p < 0.01). While Co-Cr crowns presented the highest pullout strength values, Pr showed the lowest values (data collapsed over cement) (p < 0.001). Retentiveness data as a function of both factors demonstrated similar pullout resistance between groups without cement (p < 0.001), except Zr baseline. Also, Co-Cr presented higher pullout strength compared to other materials., Conclusions: Self-adhesive resin cement exhibited superior retention compared to temporary cement, regardless of crown material. Co-Cr and titanium presented higher levels of retention to Ti-base abutment after being cemented., (© 2018 by the American College of Prosthodontists.)

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the outcomes of shear (S) and microtensile (μT) bond strength tests of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) to dentin. Aging with either fatigue or thermocycling were conducted for comparison with baseline microtensile group., Methods: CAD/CAM FRC (Trinia, Bicon LLC, Boston, USA) blocks were milled to 3-mm diameter cylinders for shear and to blocks (5×5×5mm) for μT. Sixty extracted human molars were flattened to obtain dentin surfaces and randomly divided in four groups (n=15): (1) SC: samples tested in shear 24h after bonding; (2) μTC: samples tested in μT 24h after bonding); (3) μTF: samples submitted to mechanical fatigue prior to μT test, and; (4) μTT: thermocycling prior to μT test. Bonding system was applied onto the FRC material (Cera-Resin Bond, CRB, Shofu Dental, Kyoto, Japan). A conventional three-step adhesive system (All-bond 3, Bisco, Schaumburg, USA) was use with a self-cure resin cement (C&B resin cement, Bisco, Schaumburg, USA). Bond strength tests were conducted at 0.75mm/min and data analyzed using Weibull distribution (p<0.05)., Results: Weibull contour plots showed a significantly lower characteristic strength (η) and Weibull modulus (m) for SC (η=6.9MPa and m=1.4) compared to μTC (η=20.9MPa and m=4.5). Fatigued and thermocycled μT groups presented significantly reduced characteristic strength (η=3.1MPa and η=4.1MPa, respectively) compared to μTC. Weibull modulus was significantly reduced only for SC and μTF groups compared μTC. Failure predominantly occurred at the cement/FRC interface., Significance: FRC bonded to dentin samples presented lower Weibull modulus and characteristic bond strength when immediately tested in shear compared to microtensile. Aging through thermocycling or mechanical fatigue significantly reduced the characteristic strength in microtensile testing, with the majority of failures emerging between restoration material and cement interface., (Copyright © 2018 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two finishing techniques, glazing or polishing, in comparison with the as‐cut condition, on the biaxial‐flexural‐strength (BFS) of a zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS). Cylinders were milled from CAD/CAM blocks and sliced to obtain disc‐shaped specimens (ISO6872:2015). Polished and glazed specimens were processed following the manufacturer's instructions. Thirty‐three specimens were obtained for each condition and microstructural and BFS/fractographic characterizations were performed. BFS and roughness data were analyzed using Weibull statistics and ANOVA one‐way with Tukey post‐hoc test, respectively. While a rougher surface was observed for as‐cut specimens, smoother surfaces were observed for polished and glazed ZLS at microscopical evaluation and confirmed through surface‐roughness evaluation. X‐ray spectra depicted a glass phase for all groups and characteristic metasilicate, lithium disilicate, and lithium phosphate peaks for the as‐cut and polished specimens. Glazed specimens showed higher characteristic strength than polished and as‐cut specimens, which did not differ significantly. While higher Weibull‐modulus was observed for the polished than for the as‐cut specimens, no statistically significant differences were noted between glazed and polished, and between glazed and as‐cut specimens. ZLS presents higher strength when glazed, and polishing increases the structural reliability of the material relative to the as‐cut condition. Both finishing techniques reduced surface roughness similarly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]