Search

Objective: To assess the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in the Rituximab in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)–Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial and identify novel potential risk factors. Methods: VTE events in 197 patients enrolled in the RAVE trial were analyzed. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with VTE in ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV). Results: VTE occurred in 16 patients (8.1%) with an overall average time to event of 1.5 months (range 1.0–2.75). In univariate analyses with calculation of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), heart involvement (HR 17.408 [95% CI 2.247–134.842]; P = 0.006), positive proteinase 3 (PR3)–ANCA (HR 7.731 [95% CI 1.021–58.545]; P = 0.048), pulmonary hemorrhage (HR 3.889 [95% CI 1.448–10.448]; P = 0.008), and the presence of red blood cell casts (HR 15.617 [95% CI 3.491–69.854]; P < 0.001) were associated with the onset of VTE. In multivariate models adjusted for age and sex, the significant associations between VTE events and heart involvement (HR 21.836 [95% CI 2.566–185.805]; P = 0.005), PR3‐ANCA (HR 9.12 [95% CI 1.158–71.839]; P = 0.036), pulmonary hemorrhage (HR 3.91 [95% CI 1.453–10.522]; P = 0.007), and urinary red blood cell casts (HR 16.455 [95% CI 3.607–75.075]; P < 0.001) remained. Conclusion: Patients diagnosed as having AAV with pulmonary hemorrhage, positive PR3‐ANCA, heart involvement, and the presence of red blood cell casts are at an increased risk to develop VTE. Further studies are needed to confirm and expand these findings and to explore the mechanisms of hypercoagulability in these patients with the aim of informing potential targets for therapeutic intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a systematic review for evidence of the clinical efficacy of cancer immunotherapies. We searched PubMed from inception to 14 February 2018 for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer immunotherapies. Re-analyses were performed to estimate the summary effect size under random-effects, the 95% confidence interval (CI), heterogeneity, and the 95% prediction interval, and we determined the strength of the evidence. We examined publication bias and excess significance bias. 63 articles corresponding to 247 meta-analyses were eligible. Nine meta-analyses were classified to have convincing evidence, and 75 were classified as suggestive evidence. The clinical benefit of immunotherapy was supported by convincing evidence in the following settings: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy for treating advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, adoptive cell immunotherapy for NSCLC, and the combination of interferon α and chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma. A further meta-analysis of 16 RCTs showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAb therapy had a benefit in patients with solid tumors (overall survival; hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68–0.79; p < 0.001), supported by convincing evidence. In the future, rigorous approaches are needed when interpreting meta-analyses to gain better insight into the true efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]