Search

Aim: To examine (1) the mediating role of self‐efficacy between resilience and self‐management behaviours and (2) the moderating role of diabetes distress on the relationship between self‐efficacy and self‐management behaviours in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Design: Cross‐sectional design. Methods: Totally, 195 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for more than 5 months but less than 18 months were recruited from three endocrine clinics in Taiwan through convenience sampling. Self‐reported questionnaires including demographic and disease characteristics, resilience, self‐efficacy and self‐management behaviours were used to collect data from October 2020 to May 2021. Moderated mediation analysis was performed by Hayes's PROCESS macro. Result: According to bootstrapping results, the indirect effect of resilience on self‐management was significant, although the direct effect of resilience on self‐management was not. Participants were categorized into with and without diabetes distress groups. The results of moderated mediation analysis indicated self‐efficacy significantly correlated with self‐management behaviours in participants without diabetes distress, although self‐efficacy did not significantly correlate with self‐management in participants with diabetes distress. Conclusion: The association of resilience with self‐management behaviours was fully mediated through self‐efficacy with diabetes distress moderating the relationship between self‐efficacy and self‐management behaviours in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Impact Improving resilience could enhance self‐efficacy leading to possible improvement in self‐management behaviour, although improving self‐efficacy might not benefit self‐management behaviours for those with high levels of diabetes distress. Healthcare providers need to first assess and address the diabetes distress before intervening to improve self‐efficacy to enhance self‐management behaviours in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Patient or Public Contribution: When designing this study, two patients newly diagnosed with diabetes were consulted about the importance of self‐management behaviours for them personally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: To construct a path model addressing influences of diabetes distress, self‐efficacy of injecting insulin, resilience and decisional balance of injecting insulin to quality of life (QoL) in insulin‐treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Background: Insulin regimens more negatively impact QoL than oral medication treatments in patients with T2DM. Understanding the factors and influencing pathways associated with subsequent QoL will help nurses design timely interventions to improve QoL of insulin‐treated T2DM patients. Design: A 9‐month prospective design was employed in this study. Methods: Self‐reported questionnaires were used to collect data from 185 insulin‐treated T2DM patients. At baseline, diabetes distress and self‐efficacy of injecting insulin were collected, while QoL, resilience and decisional balance of injecting insulin were collected 9 months later. Data were collected from February 2017 to February 2018. Structural equation modelling was used for analysis. This study was conducted based on the STROBE. Results: Low baseline diabetes distress and high 9‐month decisional balance of injecting insulin directly associated with high 9‐month QoL. High baseline self‐efficacy of injecting insulin and high 9‐month resilience directly associated with high 9‐month decisional balance of insulin injection and indirectly associated with high 9‐month QoL. High baseline diabetes distress directly and indirectly associated with poor 9‐month QoL. Conclusions: Diabetes distress, self‐efficacy of injecting insulin, resilience and decisional balance of injecting insulin play different roles in associating with QoL in insulin‐treated T2DM patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses could provide educational programs focusing on enhancing decisional balance of injecting insulin to improve QoL in insulin‐treated patients. Improving self‐efficacy of injecting insulin and resilience could be promising strategies to improve the decisional balance of injecting insulin. More timely assessment of diabetes distress and intervention might be powerful strategies to improve subsequent QoL in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposes: Women with diabetes (WD) are more severely impacted by the consequence of suboptimal diabetes control. This study aims to examine the impact of demographic and disease characteristics, baseline self-stigma, role strain, diabetes distress on Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) levels, quality of life (D-QoL) and 6-month A1C levels in younger WD. Methods: This study was a 6-month prospective study. In total, 193 WD aged 20–64 years were selected by convenience sampling from three outpatient clinics in Taiwan. Demographic and disease characteristics, self-stigma, role strain, diabetes distress, A1C levels, and D-QoL were collected at baseline. A1C levels were further collected 6 months later. Structural equation modeling was conducted to test the hypothesized model. Results: The final model supported that higher baseline D-QoL directly associated with lower concurrent A1C levels and indirectly associated with lower 6-month A1C levels through baseline A1C levels. Higher baseline self-stigma, role strain, and diabetes distress directly associated with lower baseline D-QoL, and indirectly associated with higher 6-month A1C levels through D-QoL. Conclusion: Improving self-stigma, role strain, and diabetes distress should be considered as promising strategies to improve D-QoL in young WD. D-QoL plays a mediation role between baseline self-stigma, role strain, diabetes distress and subsequent glycemic control in younger WD. Enhancing baseline D-QoL is fundamental to improve subsequent glycemic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Insulin-naive patients are often reluctant to receive insulin treatment, and even insulin-treated patients frequently have poor rates of adherence to their prescribed insulin injection regimes. Assessing attitudes toward insulin injection may help in the design of interventions that improve the insulin injection behaviors of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The concept of decisional balance has been associated with behavior in many studies and may be useful in assessing the attitude of patients with T2DM toward insulin injection. Decisional balance for insulin injection (DBII) has not been widely assessed in patients with T2DM. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop an insulin injection (DBII) scale that is valid for insulin-naive and insulin-treated patients and to test the psychometric characteristics of this scale based on the concept of decisional balance. Methods: This cross-sectional study administered an 18-item DBII scale, including pro and con subscales, to 95 insulin-naive and 237 insulin-treated patients in Taiwan. The decisional balance score was calculated as the mean score of the pro subscale minus the mean score of the con subscale. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis; concurrent validity was assessed by examining the association between the score of the DBII scale and the stages of behavioral change and of hemoglobin A1c for, respectively, insulin-naive patients and insulin-treated patients; and reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Results: A 13-item DBII scale supported by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis was developed. The stages of behavioral change and hemoglobin A1c levels were found to be significantly associated with the scores of decisional balance of the 13-item DBII scale for both insulin-naive and insulin-treated patients. The Cronbach's α ranged between.78 and.92. Conclusions: The 13-item DBII scale is appropriately short and possesses satisfactory validity and reliability for both insulin-naive and insulin-treated patients with T2DM. Healthcare providers may use this scale as a checklist to guide clinical discussions related to insulin therapy with both insulin-naive and insulin-treated patients with T2DM across time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To explore the risk factors of falls and the gender differences based on demographic and disease characteristics, physical capability, and fear of falling in older adults with diabetes visiting outpatient clinics in Taiwan. Design: Cross‐sectional design. Methods: A total of 485 patients with type 2 diabetes aged between 65 and 80 years were recruited from three endocrine outpatient clinics in Taiwan. Demographic and disease characteristics, fall history in the previous one year and fear of falling were collected by a self‐reported questionnaire. Calf circumference, handgrip strength, one‐leg standing and time up‐and‐go tests were all performed to assess the physical capability of participants. Data were collected from May 2019 to May 2020. Results: Female gender (OR = 1.75), handgrip strength (OR = 2.43) and fear of falling (OR = 3.38) were important risk factors of falls overall, although fear of falling (OR = 4.69) was the only important risk factor of falls in males, while handgrip strength (OR = 3.48) and fear of falling (OR = 2.86) were important risk factors of falls in females. The sensitivity of simultaneous screening handgrip strength and fear of falling were 85.7, 86.4 and 86.2 in males, females and older adults overall with diabetes, respectively. Conclusion: Fear of falling was an important risk factor of falls in both genders, especially in males. Handgrip strength was an important risk factor of falls specifically for females. By simultaneously screening fear of falling and handgrip strength, risk of falls in older adults with diabetes at outpatient clinics could be identified in a more timely manner. Impact Nurses could periodically and simultaneously assess fear of falling and handgrip strength of older adults with diabetes at outpatient clinics. For those are identified at risk of falls on either fear of falling or handgrip strength, nurses could provide corresponding interventions to reduce the fear of falling or improve muscle strength to prevent such falls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]