Search

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is considered for high‐risk patients in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, these risk factors are recognized as negative prognostic factors, not as predictors of ACT efficacy. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of ACT in stage IB patients by retrospectively examining patients who had recurrence. Methods: We reviewed 1399 patients with stage IB (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition) LUAD from 2012 to 2017 in our institution and found 147 patients with recurrence. The last follow‐up date was December 30, 2021. One‐to‐one propensity‐score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the potential selection bias. Results: Fifty‐five (37.4%) patients had received ACT and 92 (62.6%) had not (non‐ACT). Patients with ACT were younger (p < 0.001), had larger tumors (p < 0.001) and more lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.02), and seemed to have less distant recurrence (p = 0.001). After PSM, 110 patients were matched and baseline characteristics were balanced. ACT was not associated with improved disease‐free survival (DFS) after matching (mDFS = 23.5 m for ACT vs. 29.5 m for non‐ACT, p = 0.13). ACT failed to prolong DFS of patients in the extracranial recurrence subgroup and EGFR mutation subgroups, and was even associated with shorter DFS in intracranial relapsed patients (mDFS = 30.3 m vs. 33.5 m, p = 0.083) and patients with tumor ≤30 mm (mDFS = 21.9 m vs. 30.8 m, p = 0.076). Conclusion: In patients who were destined to develop recurrence after completely resected stage IB LUAD, ACT might not be associated with improved DFS. Further large multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring proves to be a promising approach to assess response and predict survival in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether the dynamic changes in ctDNA EGFR mutation status have the same predictive value as ctDNA remains unknown. This study aims to explore the predictive value of dynamic changes in both ctDNA and ctDNA EGFR status. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using 91 ctDNA samples from a cohort of 28 patients who were diagnosed with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC and treated with EGFR‐TKIs, including 14 patients treated with first‐/second‐generation TKIs and 14 treated with osimertinib. Blood samples at baseline (BL), within 4 weeks after TKI initiation (Week4), within 12 weeks before progression (pre‐PD), and at progression were collected. The relationship alternatives in ctDNA status, ctDNA EGFR status and response to EGFR‐TKIs as well as progression‐free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results: We categorized 20 BL‐ctDNA positive patients with available Week4‐ctDNA into two groups: ctDNA‐clearance (N = 7, 35%) and ctDNA‐non‐clearance (N = 13, 65%). The ctDNA‐clearance group had better PFS than the ctDNA‐non‐clearance group (ctDNA‐clearance vs. ctDNA‐non‐clearance, p = 0.091, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15–1.19). According to Week4‐EGFR status, we observed that PFS was significantly longer in EGFR‐clearance patients than EGFR‐non‐clearance groups, (p = 0.011, HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.08–0.72). We then categorized patients into three subgroups according to Week4‐ctDNA and Week4‐EGFR status: non‐clearance (N = 9), only‐EGFR‐clearance (concomitant alterations non‐clearance) (N = 4), and all‐clearance (N = 7). The nonclearance group had a significantly worse PFS than the all‐clearance group (median PFS = 5.07 vs. 11.40 months, p = 0.029, HR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.05–11.49). The only‐EGFR‐clearance group had a similar PFS to the all‐clearance group (p = 0.607), which was longer than that of the non‐clearance group (median PFS = 9.20 vs. 5.07 months, p = 0.060, HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.05–1.18). We found that the all‐clearance group had a similar objective response rate (ORR) to the only‐EGFR‐clearance group (p = 1.000) and a higher ORR than the non‐clearance group (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Monitoring of EGFR clearance in ctDNA is promising and cost‐effective in assessing response and predicting survival in EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients treated with EGFR‐TKIs, with similar predictive value to ctDNA surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the prognosis of mutant lung cancer; however, the clinical application value of TKIs for nonclassical EGFR mutation is unclear, especially for patients with rare uncommon mutations. Methods: A retrospective study based on electronic medical records was conducted to collect data on the effectiveness of afatinib in patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) bearing uncommon mutations between January 2017 and January 2021. Results: Forty‐two patients with uncommon mutations treated with afatinib were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (10 of 20 patients). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval = 8.5–18.3 months). Of the 42 patients, the median TTF was 15.0, 11.7, and 16.6 months in patients with Gly719Xaa (G719X), Ser768Ile (S768I), and Leu861Gln (L861Q) mutations, respectively. In patients with the rare uncommon mutation, the median TTF was 10.0 months, and the ORR was 50.0%. Afatinib demonstrated clinical activity across a set type of specific rare uncommon mutations, including EGFR L747P, A767_V769dup, and L833V/H835L, with a case having a TTF of more than 1 year. Molecular profiling reports of 16 afatinib‐resistant biopsy samples were available, and the secondary T790M mutation was detected in one patient with L833V/H835L mutation and one harboring S768I/L858R mutation. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that afatinib is effective in patients with uncommon mutations. Mechanisms of afatinib resistance vary and need further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a resistance mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we describe the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients and explore the treatment modes after transformation. Methods: EGFR‐mutant LADC patients with SCLC transformation were retrospectively included in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Survival outcomes and corresponding influential factors were analyzed. Results: Twenty‐nine patients were included in the study. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients who received first‐line EGFR‐TKIs was 13.1 months. The median time to SCLC transformation was 27.5 months. After transformation, the objective response rates of patients who received first‐line chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs were 43.8% and 37.5%, respectively. The median PFS of patients reveiving chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs was significantly longer than that of patients receiving chemotherapy without EGFR‐TKIs (5.2 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05–0.72; p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients who received chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs (14.8 vs. 13.0 months; p = 0.474). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, both anti‐angiogenic treatment (HR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01–0.29; p = 0.001) and local radiotherapy (HR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08–0.97; p = 0.044) were significantly associated with better patient OS after transformation. Conclusions: Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and EGFR‐TKIs as first‐line treatment after SCLC transformation can benefit patients in PFS but not in OS. However, anti‐angiogenic therapies and local radiotherapy can significantly prolong OS after transformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that PD‐1 inhibitors are effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents benefit advanced NSCLC patients as subsequent therapy remains unknown. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety profile of this combination strategy as subsequent therapy for NSCLC patients in a real‐world setting. Methods: A total of 30 patients with advanced NSCLC, who progressed after at least two cycles of platinum‐based chemotherapy or targeted therapy and subsequently received combination therapy with a PD‐1 inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent, were included in this study. The safety profile and efficacy were also investigated. Results: At the time of a median follow‐up period of 10.7 months, 28 patients had experienced progression of disease and 16 patients had died. The median progression‐free survial (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.179–6.821), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.3 months (95% CI: 8.912–19.659). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 10.3% and 72.4%, respectively (0 complete remission, three partial responses and 18 stable disease in 29 patients with measurable lesions). Patients with PD‐L1 expression of at least 1% of tumor cells (n = 5) had relatively longer mPFS compared to those with PD‐L1‐negative tumors (n = 14), (11.6 months vs. 3.7 months). Treatment was suspended in two patients due to grade 3 immune‐related pneumonia and pancreatitis, respectively. No novel adverse events (AEs) or grade 4 AEs were observed. Conclusions: A combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeting agents may be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC as subsequent treatment, especially for patients with PD‐L1 protein expression positive, and treatment is well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other antitumor agents may delay drug resistance. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety of first‐line concurrent EGFR‐TKIs and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without an antiangiogenic agent for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in the real world. Methods: A total of 30 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and activating EGFR mutations concurrently received an EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. The safety profile and efficacy were retrospectively reviewed. Results: At the median follow‐up time of 22.1 months, 18 patients had experienced disease progression, and six patients had died because of disease. The median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 21.2 months (95% CI: 12.631–29.798). Of the 28 patients who had measurable lesions, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 71.4% and 96.4%, respectively (one patient achieved complete remission, 19 patients had a partial response and seven patients had stable disease). Male patients had significantly longer mPFS than female patients (32.6 vs. 14.6 months, HR = 3.593, 95% CI: 1.158–11.148, p = 0.027). The most frequently seen grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicities, seen in three cases (10%). Three patients ceased bevacizumab due to vascular events, including hypertension (grade 2, 6.7%) and venous thrombosis (grade 2, 3.3%), and continued EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy. Conclusions: The combination of first‐generation EGFR‐TKIs with platinum‐based chemotherapy may be a first‐line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring activated EGFR mutations and is well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can significantly prolong overall survival for patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐rearrangement. However, the real‐world evaluation status of ALK/EGFR in China remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective study including 1134 patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC (stage IIIb–IV) at 12 Chinese hospitals. Results: The most common evaluation methods were amplification‐refractory mutation system for EGFR status and immunohistochemistry targeting D5F3 for ALK status. Among patients with non‐squamous, the EGFR mutation rate was 44.1% and the ALK rearrangement rate was 10.0%. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the EGFR mutation rate was 8.3% and the ALK rearrangement rate was 3.7%. Among all patients, gender (HR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.2–2.4, P = 0.006), smoking history (HR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.3–2.7, P = 0.001), histology (HR = 5.0, 95%CI = 2.4–10.1, P < 0.001), and brain metastases (HR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.1–2.2, P = 0.017) were independent predictors of EGFR mutation, while age (HR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.7–4.1, P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of ALK rearrangement. The median time from tumor diagnosis to EGFR or ALK status confirmation was 7 and 5 days, respectively. Targeted therapy rate was 73.8% in EGFR‐positive patients and 51.4% in ALK‐positive patients. There was a negative correlation between the first‐line targeted therapy rate and the EGFR mutation detection period (r = −0.152, P = 0.02), while no significant correlation among patients with ALK rearrangement (r = −0.179, P = 0.076). Conclusion: Squamous NSCLC patients should also be routinely tested to determine their EGFR/ALK statuses. The first‐line targeted therapy rate remains low in Chinese patients with NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker that improves progression‐free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy. However, afatinib leads to more adverse events than first‐generation EGFR inhibitors. Hence, exploration of the optimal afatinib initial dose and its efficacy and safety in Asian patients has drawn extensive attention. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated demographic and clinical information, survival data, and adverse events in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients treated with afatinib from 27 February 2017 to 30 October 2018. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Thirty‐nine (65%) patients received afatinib as first‐line treatment. The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% confidence internal 7.6–17.0). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, gender, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis status, afatinib starting dose, and mutation type did not significantly influence PFS. No significant difference in median PFS between patients treated with an initial dose of afatinib of 40 mg or 30 mg, either in the first‐line (14.5 vs. 5.2 months; P = 0.101) or in a second or later‐line setting (3.0 vs. 5.0 months; P = 0.375) was observed. The incidence of all grades of rash/acne (92.5% vs. 61.1%; P = 0.011) and paronychia (82.5% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.010) in the 40 mg group was significantly higher than in the 30 mg group. Conclusion: First‐line afatinib treatment is beneficial for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. Initial dose and baseline brain metastasis status do not significantly impact PFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Crizotinib is associated with a favorable survival benefit in patients with ALK‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, a subset of patients harboring ALK rearrangement shows a poor response. Methods: We collected the clinical features and survival outcomes of 28 primary‐resistant responders (PRR) with progression‐free survival (PFS) of < 3 months on crizotinib and compared these with 78 long‐term responders (LTR) that achieved > 24 months PFS (control). Results: Primary resistance was observed in 6.5% of the patients. The median PFS of the PRR and LTR groups was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.73) and 47.0 months (95% CI 34.39–59.64), respectively. A better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was significantly associated with longer PFS (odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.33; P = 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the PRR group was 8.4 months (95% CI 3.47–13.42) and crizotinib as first‐line treatment was an independent predictive factor for survival outcome (P = 0.005). Patients administered ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors after crizotinib progression had significantly longer survival than the PRR group treated with best supportive care (P = 0.007), but no significant difference was found between ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and single chemotherapy (P = 0.944). Conclusion: Patients with primary resistance to crizotinib displayed unfavorable survival outcomes and the underlying mechanism cannot be identified in clinical features. Nevertheless, next‐generation ALK inhibitors and chemotherapy after crizotinib progression could confer a therapeutic and survival benefit in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Large scale randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the use of bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conveys significant survival benefits. We explored the clinical impact of a first‐line regimen containing bevacizumab (B+) versus a non‐bevacizumab regimen (non‐B) in advanced non‐squamous NSCLC (NS‐NSCLC) patients in a real world setting. Methods: The medical records of patients with advanced NS‐NSCLC who received first‐line therapy with or without bevacizumab were retrospectively collected. The primary outcome was progression‐free survival (PFS), with secondary objectives of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Exploratory analysis of EGFR and ALK status was conducted in subgroup. Results: One hundred and forty‐nine patients met the selection criteria: 62 in the B+ and 87 in the non‐B group. The baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the overall population, the median PFS was significantly longer in the B+ than in the non‐B group (9.7 vs. 7.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.91; P = 0.0184). Improved trends in both ORR and DCR were observed in the B+ group. In wild‐type patients, the median PFS of the B+ was 11.3 compared to 5.5 months in the non‐B group (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20–0.91; P = 0.0234). In wild type and unknown populations, the median PFS was 11.3 (B+) compared to 6.0 months (non‐B) (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28–1.02; P = 0.0520). The safety profile was acceptable in both groups and no unexpected findings were observed. Conclusion: Our analysis confirmed that a first‐line regimen containing bevacizumab showed superior clinical benefits over a non‐bevacizumab regimen in Chinese patients with advanced NS‐NSCLC in a real world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with TS‐1 might overcome EGFR‐TKI resistance, which has been indicated by several preclinical studies. We investigated the synergistic efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of EGFR‐TKIs and TS‐1 in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired resistance to previous EGFR‐TKI therapy. Methods: This was a phase II, single‐arm and single‐center prospective study. Stage IIIB–IV NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to prior EGFR‐TKI treatment were enrolled. All patients were administered combination therapy of TS‐1 and continuing EGFR‐TKIs in this study. The primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), while overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 42 patients with acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs were eligible for this study. The median PFS for all patients was five months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–5.4). The OS and DCR were 31.9 (95% CI 17.8–46.0) months and 69.0% (29/42), respectively. No grade 4 toxicity or grade 3 hematologic toxicity was observed in this study. One patient (2%) experienced grade 3 elevated total serum bilirubin. Conclusion: The combination treatment of TS‐1 and EGFR‐TKIs was effective and well tolerated by patients who had experienced prior EGFR‐TKI treatment failure. Our results need to be validated by larger prospective clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study was conducted to evaluate the value of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for radical resection of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Data of 100 patients who had undergone radical resection of non-small cell lung cancer and were treated with cisplatin/gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy between June 2007 and December 2010 at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were reviewed. Results The median age was 59 years (range 36-73); 82% of the patients were male. Forty-two percent had adenocarcinoma and 55% had squamous cell carcinoma. Most patients had pathologic IIB (29%) and IIIA (44%) stage disease. Eighty-five percent of patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy, with 76% completing the planned full dose. The main reason for a reduced gemcitabine dose in 13 patients was grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The median dose and dose intensity were 8377.1 mg/m2 and 708 mg/(m2/week) for gemcitabine and 293.38 mg/m2 and 25.24 mg/(m2/week) for cisplatin, respectively. During follow-up the median disease-free survival was 33.8 months (95% confidence interval [ CI] 15.938-51.676). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (hazard ratio [ HR] 0.404, 95% CI 0.241-0.676; P = 0.001) and pathologic stage I ( HR 4.379, 95% CI 1.721-11.142; P = 0.002) achieved better disease-free survival. The survival rates at one, two, and five years were 94%, 77%, and 55%, while the survival rates without recurrence were 64%, 53%, and 39%, respectively. Conclusion As an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, gemcitabine with cisplatin is well tolerated. Patients with squamous cell carcinomas or pathologic stage I achieve better results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-carboplatin combined with intercalated gefitinib in patients with advanced, untreated, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. Methods A total of 29 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients were Chinese, with a histology type of adenocarcinoma, without a smoking history, and as a result of the limited tissue sample, an epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation test could not be performed. All patients received chemotherapy of paclitaxel-carboplatin every 21 days for four cycles, and gefitinib (250 mg/day) was administered on days eight to 17 of the chemotherapy cycle. If the patient responded to chemotherapy, maintenance therapy of 250mg of gefitinib could be administered daily. Results All of the 29 patients received at least one cycle of chemotherapy and gefitinib, and 25 patients received four cycles of therapy. Eighteen patients selected maintenance therapy with gefitinib. The objective response rate was 74.1% (95% confidence interval, 53.7% to 88.9%). No complete response was achieved. The median progression-free survival was 16 months, however, the median overall survival was not available by the conclusion of the study. The major adverse event was hematologic toxicity. Conclusions The regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin combined with intercalated gefitinib showed a high response rate and a favorable safety profile. Gefitinib maintenance therapy was proven to be beneficial. This study proposes a good pattern of chemotherapy combined with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]