Search

AIMS: Congestive heart failure (CHF) associated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) has emerged as a relevant problem in clinical and scientific communities. We performed an up-to-date, comprehensive meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence and risk of CHF in cancer patients receiving VEGFR-TKIs. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology up to August 31 2013 were searched for relevant articles. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 10 553 patients from 36 clinical trials were included. The overall incidence of all grade and high grade CHF associated with VEGFR-TKIs was 3.2% (95% CI 1.8%, 5.8%) and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 2.3%), respectively. The use of VEGFR-TKIs significantly increased the risk of developing all grade (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.76, 3.20, P < 0.001) and high grade (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.74, 7.05, P < 0.001) CHF. In subgroup analyses, the risk of CHF did not significantly vary with tumour types (P = 0.071 for all grade; P = 0.72 for high grade) and VEGFR-TKIs (P = 0.55 for all grade; P = 0.99 for high grade). Meta-regression indicated that CHF might possibly occur early in the treatment of VEGFR-TKIs. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing congestive heart failure in cancer patients. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and provide close monitoring in patients receiving these therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to gather current data and evaluate not only the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation with bevacizumab, but also the potential risk factors for this adverse event. Materials and methods: We carried out a literature search in PubMed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported from January 2000 to December 2013. Summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Results: A total of 26,833 patients from 33 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Bevacizumab-containing therapy significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade (RR 3.35, 95 % CI 2.35-4.79, P < 0.001) and fatal GI perforation (RR 3.08, 95%CI: 1.04-9.08, P = 0.042). On subgroup analysis, no significant risk differences were found based on bevacizumab dosage, treatment duration, treatment line, type of clinical trial and median age. When stratified by tumor types, a significantly increased risk of GI perforation with bevacizumab was observed in colorectal cancer (RR 2.84, 95% CI 1.43-5.61, P = 0.003), gynecologic cancer (RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.71-6.62, P < 0.001) and prostate cancer (RR 6.01, 95% CI 1.78-20.28, P = 0.004). Additionally, the use of bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of GI perforation when used in conjunction with taxanes (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.92-4.96, P < 0.001) or oxaliplatin (RR 2.85, 95% CI 1.07-7.57, P = 0.036). Conclusions: Bevacizumab treatment is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing GI perforation, and clinicians should be aware of the risks of GI perforation with the administration of this drug in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Aflibercept, a fully humanized vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agent, has emerged as an effective therapy in the treatment of various solid tumors. We carried out an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in cancer patients treated with aflibercept. Methods: We searched databases such as PubMed and Web of Science, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meetings for records up to August 2013 to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III trials evaluating aflibercept in cancer patients with adequate data on FAEs. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed-effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: A total of 3,060 patients with a variety of solid tumors from ten clinical trials were included in our analysis. The overall incidence of FAEs associated with aflibercept was 5.1 % (95%CI: 3.8-6.8 %). The use of aflibercept significantly increased the risk of FAEs compared to patients treated with control medication (OR 1.81, 95 % CI: 1.20-2.72, p = 0.004). Additionally, the most common causes of FAEs were infection (38.8 %), hemorrhage (5.9 %) and GI perforation (5.9 %), respectively. Conclusions: With available evidence, the use of aflibercept is associated with an increased risk of FAEs compared to controls. Further studies are still needed to investigate this association. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of aflibercept remains justified in its approved indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine incidence rate and overall risk of hypertension with vandetanib in cancer patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search for studies published up to March 2012 was performed. Summary incidence rates, relative risk ( RR), and 95% confidence intervals ( CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Results A total of 11 trials with 3154 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension in patients with cancer were 24.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1-30.2%] and 6.4% (95% CI, 3.3-9.5%), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the pooled incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 21.8% [95% CI, 15-30.5%] and 7.6% (95% CI, 2.8-18.8%), respectively, among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and 32.1% (95% CI: 27.3-37.3%) and 8.8% (5.9%-12.9%), respectively, among MTC patients, and 15.4 (95% CI: 3.2-33.7%) and 3.4% (95% CI: 1%-11.1%) respectively, among non-MTC/NSCLC tumors patients. Furthermore, vandetanib was associated with a significant increased risk of all-grade hypertension (RR 5.1, 95% CI: 3.76-6.92, P = 0.000) and high-grade hypertension (RR 8.06, 95% CI: 3.41-19.04, P = 0.000) in comparison with controls. Conclusions There is a significant risk of developing hypertension in cancer patients receiving vandetanib. Appropriate monitoring and treatment is strongly recommended to prevent cardiovascular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposes: To gain a better understanding of the overall incidence and risk of hypertension in cancer patients who receive pazopanib and to compare the differences in incidence among sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib. Methods: Several databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of patients with cancer assigned single drug pazopanib 800 mg/day with data on hypertension available. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Results: A total of 1,651 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 13 clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension in cancer patients were 35.9 % (95 % CI 31.5-40.6 %) and 6.5 % (95 % CI 5.2-8.0 %), respectively. The use of pazopanib was associated with an increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 4.97, 95 % CI 3.38-7.30, p < 0.001) and high-grade hypertension (RR 2.87, 95 % CI 1.16-7.12, p = 0.023). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-grade (RR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.96-1.53, p = 0.11) and high-grade hypertension (RR 1.29, 95 % CI 0.80-2.07, p = 0.30) between RCC and non-RCC patients. Interestingly, the risk of all-grade hypertension with pazopanib was substantially higher than sorafenib (RR 1.99; 95 % CI 1.73-2.29, p = 0.00) and sunitinib (RR 2.20; 95 % CI 1.92-2.52, p = 0.00), while the risk of pazopanib-induced high-grade hypertension was similar to sorafenib (RR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.75-1.30, p = 0.90) and sunitinib (RR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.62-1.06, p = 0.12). Conclusions: The use of pazopanib is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and appropriate managements are recommended during the therapy. Future studies are still needed to investigate the risk reduction and possible use of pazopanib in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]