Search

Chronic constipation is a functional gastrointestinal disease that is detrimental to the quality of patient life. Cassia obtusifolia L. (CO) and Foeniculum vulgare M. (FV) are commonly used as medicinal foods in many countries. We aimed to examine the laxative effect and their underlying mechanism of CO and FV mixture on loperamide (lop)-induced constipated rats. To determine the laxative effects of these compounds, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: the control, lop-induced constipated (2mg/kg), and three doses (100, 300, and 500mg/kg) of CO and FV mixture-, and Bisacodyl (bis, 3.3mg/kg)-treated groups. The mixture of CO and FV and bis were orally administered once a day for 4 weeks. For induction of constipation, the lop were treated with a dose of 2 mg/kg twice a day on the 3rd week after treatments of CO and FV extracts and bis. The results were revealed that the CO and FV mixture has the laxative effects more than those in CO and FV-alone treatments on constipated rats by determining the stool parameters, including stool number and weight. Indeed, stool parameters, such as, stool number, weight, and water contents and colonic peristalsis from the intestinal transit length and ratio were dramatically improved by CO and FV mixture treatment. Histological study also revealed that CO and FV mixture enhanced the thicknesses of mucosa and muscular layers of the colon in constipated rats. For their underlying mechanism, the mRNAs and proteins expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAchR) M2 and M3 and their downstream signaling were preserved by CO and FV mixture treatment in constipated rats. Therefore, this study suggests that treatment with CO and FV mixture has beneficial effects against constipation. We further suggest that CO and FV mixture may be utilized as an alternative therapeutic strategy for constipation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated features of "adult‐onset megacolon with focal hypoganglionosis." Methods: We assessed the radiologic, endoscopic, and histopathologic phenotyping and treatment outcomes of 29 patients between 2017 and 2020. Data from community controls, consisting of 19,948 adults undergoing health screenings, were analyzed to identify risk factors. Experts reviewed clinical features and pathological specimens according to the London Classification for gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology. Key results: The median age of the patients with adult‐onset megacolon with focal hypoganglionosis at symptom onset was 59 years (range, 32.0–74.9 years), with mean symptom onset only 1 year before diagnosis. All patients had focal stenotic regions with proximal bowel dilatation (mean diameter, 78.8 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72–86). The comparison with community controls showed no obvious risk factors. Ten patients underwent surgery, and all exhibited significant hypoganglionosis: 5.4 myenteric ganglion cells/cm (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7–16.4) in the stenotic regions compared to 278 cells/cm (IQR, 190–338) in the proximal and 95 cells/cm (IQR, 45–213) in the distal colon. Hypoganglionosis was associated with CD3+ T cells along the myenteric plexus. Colectomy was associated with significant symptom improvement compared to medical treatment [change in the Global Bowel Satisfaction score, −5.4 points (surgery) vs. ‐0.3 points (medical treatment); p < 0.001]. Conclusions and inferences: Adult‐onset megacolon with focal hypoganglionosis has distinct features characterized by hypoganglionosis due to inflammation. Bowel resection appears to benefit these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to investigate the role of transcutaneous neuromodulation (TN) on the regulation of gastrointestinal hormones and bile acids in patients with functional constipation (FC). Twenty FC patients were treated with TN for four weeks. The effects of TN on symptoms were evaluated by questionnaires. Plasma levels of serotonin (5-HT), motilin, somatostatin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) were measured by ELISA and 12 individual bile acids assayed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Results were as follows. (1) TN treatment increased the frequency of spontaneous bowel movement, improved the Bristol Stool Score, and reduced Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom score and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score. (2) FC patients showed decreased plasma levels of 5-HT, motilin, and VIP and an increased plasma level of somatostatin (P<0.05). Four-week TN treatment increased plasma levels of 5-HT and motilin and decreased the plasma level of somatostatin in the FC patients (P<0.05). (3) Taurocholic deoxycholate, taurocholic acid, and taurocholic lithocholic acid were increased in the FC patients (P<0.005) but reduced by TN treatment (P<0.05). This study has suggested that the therapy may improve the symptoms of FC by alleviating the disorders of gastrointestinal hormones and bile acids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives:Digital rectal examination (DRE) is a simple clinical method to diagnose anorectal disorders. High-resolution antorectal manometry (HRAM) based on a spatiotemporal plot is expected to promote improved diagnostic accuracy. However, there are no reports comparing the effectiveness of DRE and HRAM. The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the diagnostic value of DRE compared with HRAM.Methods:A total of 309 consecutive patients with chronic constipation (n=268) or fecal incontinence (n=41) who underwent a standardized DRE, HRAM, and balloon expulsion test were enrolled in this study. The diagnostic yield of DRE compared with HRAM was determined, and agreement between DRE and HRAM data was evaluated.Results:Of the constipated patients, 207 (77.2%) were diagnosed with dyssynergia using HRAM. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of DRE in the diagnosis of dyssynergia were 93.2%, 58.7%, and 91.0%, respectively, and moderate agreement was seen between the two modalities (κ-coefficient =0.542, P<0.001). In patients with fecal incontinence, there was moderate agreement in terms of anal squeeze pressure between the two modalities (κ-coefficient =0.418, P=0.006); however, there was poor agreement for anal resting tone (κ-coefficient =0.079, P=0.368).Conclusions:DRE shows high sensitivity and positive predictive value in detecting dyssynergia compared with HRAM, and could therefore be used as a bedside screening test for the diagnosis of this disorder. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the correlation between DRE and HRAM in assessing anal sphincter pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim Chronic constipation is frequently seen in women who have undergone hysterectomy or delivery. However, reports regarding anorectal physiologic features in those patients are rare. Patients with constipation associated with either radical hysterectomy or vaginal delivery were analyzed in order to clarify the anorectal physiologic features and the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy. Methods Of the constipated patients, a hysterectomy group ( n = 40), delivery group ( n = 41), and a control group ( n = 89), who had no history of either surgery or delivery before developing functional constipation were included. Their anorectal physiological tests and the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy were investigated. Results The volume of desire to defecate was greater in the hysterectomy group than in the control group (86.5 ± 55.0 mL vs 62.9 ± 33.7 mL; P = 0.03), and more than 240 mL of maximal volume of toleration was more frequently noted in the hysterectomy group (32.5%) than in the delivery group (14.6%) and control group (13.5%) ( P = 0.02).The failure of balloon expulsion was more frequently noted in the delivery group (44.0%) than in the hysterectomy group (15.0%) and control group (25.0%) ( P = 0.01). The defecation satisfaction score was significantly increased after biofeedback therapy in the hysterectomy group (2.0 ± 2.7 vs 7.8 ± 1.5, P < 0.001), the delivery group (1.6 ± 2.1 vs 6.7 ± 2.0, P < 0.001), and the control group (2.5 ± 2.7 vs 6.9 ± 2.1, P < 0.001). Conclusions Rectal hyposensitivity could have been the characteristic mechanism in the hysterectomy group, whereas dyssynergic defecation could have been the cause in the delivery group. Biofeedback therapy was effective for both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]