Search

Purpose: To model between subject variability of corneal swelling (CS) and deswelling after overnight wear of silicone hydrogel (SiHy) contact lenses., Methods: A total of 29 neophyte subjects wore 12 SiHy lenses with central transmissibility range of 31 to 211 Dk/t units on separate nights, in random order, and on one eye only. The contralateral eye served as the control. Central corneal thickness was measured using digital optical pachymetry before lens insertion, immediately after lens removal on waking, then 20, 40 minutes, 1, 2, and 3 hours later. Mixed modelling was conducted for simultaneous analysis of group and between-subject effects of CS and deswelling., Results: The best model for overnight CS versus Dk/t was linear with a random intercept showing constant between-subject differences in CS for different Dk/t values. The best fit for corneal deswelling versus time was a curvilinear random intercept and random slope model. About 90% of the total between-subject deswelling variance in either lens or control eyes was due to the intercept variability with much less (∼10%) being due to the variability of the individual deswelling rate (slope). Subject age, sex, and ametropia were not predictors of individual corneal swelling in the swelling versus Dk/t analysis. Age, however, was a significant (inverse) predictor of the rate of corneal deswelling, only in lens-wearing eyes., Conclusions: A large proportion of variability in corneal swelling is because of subject-specific differences in corneal response to hypoxia. This shows that "low swellers" and "high swellers" actually do exist.

Purpose: Conjunctival compression observed in ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography (UHR-OCT) images of contact lens edges could be actual tissue alteration, may be an optical artefact arising from the difference between the refractive indexes of the lens material and the conjunctival tissue, or could be a combination of the two. The purpose of this study is to image the artefact with contact lenses on a non-biological (non-indentable) medium and to determine the origins of the observed conjunctival compression., Methods: Two-dimensional cross-sectional images of the edges of a selection of marketed silicone hydrogel and hydrogel lenses (refractive index ranging from 1.40 to 1.43) were acquired with a research grade UHR-OCT system. The lenses were placed on three continuous surfaces, a glass sphere (refractive index n = 1.52), a rigid contact lens (n = 1.376) and the cornea of a healthy human subject (average n = 1.376). The displacement observed was analysed using ImageJ., Results: The observed optical displacement ranged between 5.39(0.06) μm with Acuvue Advance and 11.99(0.18) μm with Air Optix Night & Day when the lens was imaged on the glass reference sphere. Similarly, on a rigid contact lens displacement ranged between 5.51(0.03) and 9.72(0.12) μm. Displacement was also observed when the lenses were imaged on the human conjunctiva and ranged from 6.49(0.80) μm for the 1-day Acuvue Moist to 17.4(0.22) μm for the Pure Vision contact lens., Conclusions: An optical displacement artefact was observed when imaging a contact lens on two rigid continuous surfaces with UHR-OCT where compression or indentation of the surface could not have been a factor. Contact lenses imaged in situ also exhibited displacement at the intersection of the contact lens edge and the conjunctiva, likely a manifestation of both the artefact and compression of the conjunctiva., (© 2015 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2015 The College of Optometrists.)

Purpose: To compare central corneal swelling after eight hours of sleep in eyes wearing four different silicone hydrogel lenses with three different powers., Methods: Twenty-nine neophyte subjects wore lotrafilcon A (Dk, 140), balafilcon A (Dk, 91), galyfilcon A (Dk, 60) and senofilcon A (Dk, 103) lenses in powers -3.00, -10.00 and +6.00 D on separate nights, in random order, and on one eye only. The contra-lateral eye (no lens) served as the control. Central corneal thickness was measured using a digital optical pachometer before lens insertion and immediately after lens removal on waking., Results: For the +6.00 D and -10.00 D, lotrafilcon A induced the least swelling and galyfilcon A the most. The +6.00 D power, averaged across lens materials, induced significantly greater central swelling than the -10.00 and -3.00 D (Re-ANOVA, p<0.001), (7.7±2.9% vs. 6.8±2.8% and 6.5±2.5% respectively) but there was no difference between -10.00 and -3.00 D. Averaged for power, lotrafilcon A induced the least (6.2±2.8%) and galyfilcon A the most (7.6±3.0%) swelling at the center (Re-ANOVA, p<0.001). Central corneal swelling with +6.00 D was significantly greater than -10.00 D lens power despite similar levels of average lens transmissibility of these two lens powers., Conclusions: The differences in corneal swelling of the lens wearing eyes are consistent with the differences in oxygen transmission of the silicone hydrogel lenses. In silicone hydrogel lenses central corneal swelling is mainly driven by central lens oxygen transmissibility., (Copyright © 2013 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To establish difference thresholds of the central cornea and compare thresholds between contact lens wearers and noncontact lens wearers., Methods: Mechanical sensitivity of the central cornea was determined in 12 lens wearers and 12 nonlens wearers using a modified Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer and method of limits. Then, a series of systematically increasing stimuli were presented, with the first stimulus being 25% less than threshold. Subjects compared intensity of each stimulus with the preceding one and reported if any difference in intensity was detectable. Intensities at which an increase was perceived from the prior stimulus were recorded and the difference between the intensities was the difference threshold (DL). Five DLs were measured for each subject. Weber's constants that relate the size of difference threshold to stimulus intensity were derived for each DL level. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare Weber's constants between lens wearers and nonlens wearers., Results: A significant main effect of DL level on Weber's constant (P < 0.001) was observed, with the first DL being higher than following DLs. Lens wearers had higher Weber's constants than nonlens wearers (P = 0.02) However, no interaction was found between DL level and group type on Weber's constants (P = 0.38)., Conclusions: Differential sensitivity of the ocular surface can be successfully measured with a pneumatic esthesiometer and it appears that Weber's law holds for corneal nociceptive sensory processing. There are subtle differences in mechanical difference thresholds between lens wearers and nonlens wearers, suggesting the possibility of different neural activity levels in the two groups.

Purpose: To compare corneal mechanical adaptation measured psychophysically in contact lens wearers with or without dry eye symptoms., Methods: Two groups of contact lens wearers were recruited. One group (symptomatic) consisted of subjects with dry eye symptoms (according to the subjective evaluation of symptom of dryness [SeSoD] questionnaire). The second control group (asymptomatic) consisted of subjects reporting no symptoms. There were 32 (aged 20 to 42 years, 6 males and 26 females) and 29 subjects (aged 21 to 36 years, 9 males and 20 females) in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, respectively. Mechanical stimulus thresholds of the cornea were determined using a Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer and the ascending method of limits. Then three stimulus intensity groups (subthreshold, threshold, and suprathreshold) were applied to the eye in random order, each 20 times. Subjects rated the intensity of the stimuli using a scale of zero to four. The rating data from the two groups were compared by Friedman nonparametric ANOVA. Adaptation was defined as the reduction in subsequent ratings compared with earlier ones., Results: No significant difference was seen in subjects' thresholds in both groups (P = 0.22). The symptomatic group rated their sensations to suprathreshold stimuli higher than the asymptomatic group. More importantly, there was significant adaptation with suprathreshold mechanical stimulation in the asymptomatic group (P = 0.006) but not in the symptomatic group (P = 0.08). There was no adaptation during threshold and subthreshold stimulus sessions in either group., Conclusions: Adaptation was found to suprathreshold mechanical stimuli in the asymptomatic group but not in the symptomatic group.

Purpose: To determine the effects of silicone hydrogel lens wear and lens-solution interactions on ocular surface sensitivity., Methods: Forty-eight adapted lens wearers completed the study, which comprised two phases. Phase 1 included habitual lens wear, no lens wear (7 ± 3 days), and balafilcon A lenses (PV; PureVision; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) with a hydrogen peroxide-based regimen for 2 weeks; phase 2 included wear of PV with the use of a multipurpose solution containing either polyhexamethylene-biguanide (PHMB) or Polyquad/Aldox (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) preservative, each for 1 week, with a 2-week washout period between solutions. Tactile and pneumatic (mechanical and chemical) stimuli were delivered, and thresholds were determined by Cochet-Bonnet (Luneau Ophthalmologie, Chartres, France) and Belmonte (Cooperative Research Centre for Eye Research and Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia) pneumatic esthesiometers, respectively. Corneal and conjunctival thresholds and staining scores were assessed at baseline, after 2 and 8 hours of lens wear on day 1 and at the end of each wearing cycle (2 hours)., Results: In phase 1, compared to the no-lens baseline, corneal tactile thresholds increased at the 1-day, 8-hour and the 2-week visits (P < 0.05), whereas conjunctival mechanical thresholds decreased at the 1-day, 2-hour and the 2-week visits (P < 0.05). In phase 2, the chemical thresholds were lower with PHMB-preserved solution compared with the Polyquad/Aldox system at the 1-day, 2-hour and the 1-week visits (P < 0.05). Staining scores correlated inversely with conjunctival chemical thresholds (all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Ocular surface sensitivity changed in adapted lens wearers, when lenses were refit after a no-lens interval and during lens wear with different care regimens. The corneal staining that was observed with certain lens-solution combinations was accompanied by sensory alteration of the ocular surface-that is, higher levels of staining correlated with increased conjunctival chemical sensitivity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00455455.).

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure central and topographical corneal swelling in response to contact lens wear and eye closure, to determine whether the swelling induced by soft and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) lenses is different, and to determine whether the anterior and/or posterior corneal shape alters with corneal swelling., Methods: An Orbscan II corneal topographer was used to measure corneal swelling and the shape of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces of 16 neophytes before and after wearing soft and PMMA contact lenses with near-zero oxygen transmissibility. The lens-wearing eye was patched for 3 h., Results: The mean 15.1% +/- 3.8% (+/- SD) central corneal swelling with soft lenses was significantly >12.6% +/- 4.1% with PMMA lenses. Topographical corneal swelling was significantly greater with soft vs. PMMA lenses. However, the difference between central and peripheral corneal swelling was much greater with PMMA lenses. With both lenses, the cornea swelled significantly more in the center than the periphery. The anterior best-fit sphere radius remained unchanged in response to soft lenses (0.00 +/- 0.04 mm) and steepened slightly but significantly with PMMA lenses (-0.04 +/- 0.05 mm). The posterior best-fit sphere radius flattened significantly with both lenses (0.12 +/- 0.07 mm with soft and 0.14 +/- 0.08 mm with PMMA lenses)., Conclusions: Corneal swelling (greater centrally than peripherally) flattens the posterior surface of the cornea and is independent of lens type. Although the anterior best-fit sphere radius steepened with PMMA, the magnitude is probably clinically unimportant. Both lens types produced greater central vs. peripheral corneal swelling. However, the soft lens induced significantly greater overall swelling than PMMA. Because their oxygen transmission was the same, these results suggest that there is lateral diffusion of oxygen from the peripheral area of the cornea (that is not covered by the lens) toward the center.

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of indirectly measuring the precorneal tear film thickness and pre- and postlens tear film (PLTF) thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods: Central corneal thickness (C(1)) which includes the tear film (T) of both eyes of 40 non-contact lens wearers was measured using OCT after calibration. The mean age of the 40 subjects was 31.2 +/- 9.3 years with a mean horizontal K-reading of 7.87 mm. Rigid contact lenses with base curves 0.3- to 0.5-mm steeper than the flattest K of the eye were fitted to measure real corneal thickness (C(2)), independently of the postlens tear film. T was calculated by T = C(1) - C(2). To measure pre- and postlens tear film thickness, Focus Night & Day and Acuvue lenses (Vistakon, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL) were fitted on both eyes. Central soft lens thickness (L(1)), which includes the prelens tear film (P), was measured by OCT in situ and in saline in a wet cell (L(2)). P was calculated by P = L(1) - L(2). Thickness of the central cornea plus the postlens tear film (C(3)) was measured during lens wearing. Postlens tear film (PLTF) was calculated by PLTF = C(3) - C(2). RESULTS. The mean +/- SD precorneal tear film thickness was 3.3 +/- 1.5 microm (range, 0-6.9) before lens insertion and 4.7 +/- 2.3 microm (range, 0.7-11.0) after lens fitting, which was significantly thicker (paired t-test: P < 0.01). The prelens tear film thickness was 3.9 +/- 2.6 and 3.6 +/- 2.1 microm (mean +/- SD; paired t-test: P = 0.52) and the postlens tear film thickness was 4.5 +/- 2.3 and 4.7 +/- 3.1 microm (paired t-test: P = 0.08) on and under Focus Night & Day and Acuvue lenses, respectively. Post hoc tests showed that precorneal (baseline) and prelens tear films were equivalent, and each was different (thinner; Tukey honestly significant difference P < 0.05) from the postlens tear film., Conclusions: OCT can noninvasively measure the thickness of the precorneal and prelens tear film as well as the postlens tear film. The thickness of the normal precorneal tear film is approximately 3 micro m and becomes thicker after lens fitting. The postlens tear film is thicker than the precorneal and prelens tear films with soft contact lenses. The thickness of both pre- and postlens tear films appears to be independent of the investigated lens types.

Purpose: To measure the limbal vascular response after 8 hours of eye closure while wearing high and low permeability lenses compared to control eyes without lenses., Method: Twenty neophyte participants wore lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses (HDk; Dk = 140) or etafilcon A hydrogel lenses (LDk; Dk = 18). On two different nights the lenses were randomly worn for 8 hours during sleep in the right eyes only. Left eyes were non-lens wearing controls. Biomicroscopic images of the temporal limbal area were videotaped at baseline, on eye opening and every 20 minutes for 3 hours. A masked observer graded digitized images of the limbal area., Results: On waking and after lens removal there were no differences in hyperemia between the HDk and LDk lens wearing eyes. There were also no differences at any time between the HDk lens wearing eyes and their control eyes (p > 0.05). On waking the eyes wearing the LDk lens were more hyperemic compared to baseline (p < 0.001) and compared to their control eyes at 20 (p < 0.001) and 180 minutes (p = 0.01), indicating slower recovery from hyperemia. The HDk lens wearing eyes recovered to their baseline levels by 180 minutes (p = 0.99), compared to the LDk lens wearing eyes, which had not recovered to baseline levels by 180 minutes (p = 0.04)., Conclusion: The reduction in hyperemia over time of the HDk lens wearing eyes was the same as the controls. The LDk lens wearing eyes were more hyperemic than the controls on waking and the reduction in hyperemia over time was slower. This suggests that the slower recovery from hyperemia may be affected by the lower oxygen transmissibility of the LDk lens.

Purpose: To compare central corneal swelling and light scatter after 8 hours of sleep in eyes wearing high- and low-Dk hydrogel lenses and to the contralateral control eyes., Methods: Twenty neophyte subjects wore a Lotrafilcon A (Dk, 140; Ciba Vision, Duluth GA) silicone hydrogel lens and an Etafilcon A (Dk, 18; Acuvue; Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) 58% water content hydrogel lens of similar center thickness in random order in the right eye only, for overnight 8-hour periods. The contralateral nonwearing left eyes served as controls. Central corneal thickness was measured using an optical pachometer and light scatter using a Van den Berg stray-light meter before lens insertion, after lens removal on waking, and every 20 minutes for the next 3 hours., Results: Central corneal swelling induced by the Etafilcon A lens on eye opening was significantly higher than with the Lotrafilcon A lens (8.66%+/-2.84% versus 2.71%+/-1.91%; P<0.00001). Light scatter induced by the Etafilcon A lens on eye opening was significantly higher than with the Lotrafilcon A lens (46.09+/-5.62 versus 42.78+/-6.07 Van den Berg units, P = 0.0078). The swelling of the control eyes paired with the Etafilcon A lens-wearing eyes was also slightly but significantly higher than that of the control eyes paired with the Lotrafilcon A lens-wearing eyes (2.34%+/-1.26% versus 1.44%+/-0.91%; P = 0.0002). Light-scatter measurements were not significantly different between control sets of eyes but showed the same trend., Conclusions: In neophyte subjects, corneal swelling of the contralateral control eyes appears to be influenced by the swelling of the fellow lens-wearing eyes-that is, the swelling of the contralateral control eye was significantly lower when there was less swelling of the fellow eye wearing the high-Dk lens. Although there was no statistically significant difference in light-scatter measurements between the control sets of eyes, a trend similar to the corneal swelling results was observed, which could be used to support the suggestion that this may be a sympathetic physiological response rather than an unusual sampling coincidence.