Search

The formation of mountain belts or rift zones is commonly attributed to interactions between plates along their boundaries, but the widely distributed deformation of Asia from Himalaya to the Japan Sea and other back‐arc basins is difficult to reconcile with this notion. Through comparison of the tectonic and kinematic records of the last 50 Ma with seismic tomography and anisotropy models, we show that the closure of the former Tethys Ocean and the extensional deformation of East Asia can be best explained if the asthenospheric mantle transporting India northward, forming the Himalaya and the Tibetan Plateau, reaches East Asia where it overrides the westward flowing Pacific mantle and contributes to subduction dynamics, distributing extensional deformation over a 3,000‐km wide region. This deep asthenospheric flow partly controls the compressional stresses transmitted through the continent‐continent collision, driving crustal thickening below the Himalayas and Tibet and the propagation of strike‐slip faults across Asian lithosphere further north and east, as well as with the lithospheric and crustal flow powered by slab retreat east of the collision zone below East and SE Asia. The main shortening direction in the deforming continent between the collision zone and the Pacific subduction zones may in this case be a proxy for the direction of flow in the asthenosphere underneath, which may become a useful tool for studying mantle flow in the distant past. Our model of the India‐Asia collision emphasizes the role of asthenospheric flow underneath continents and may offer alternative ways of understanding tectonic processes. Plain Language Summary: The collision of India with Asia has induced the propagation of continent‐scale faults to large distances from the Himalayas, all the way to the margins of Asia where back‐arc basins, such as the Japan Sea, formed above the subductions of the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The respective roles of collision and subduction in controlling the deformation of Asia at such long distances are not well understood. Based on a comparison of kinematic trajectories of lithospheric plates and blocks since 50 Ma with mantle flow directions inferred from seismological data, we propose that the connection between collision and back‐arc extension is made by the asthenosphere flowing underneath. This flowing mantle comes from an upwelling zone below South Africa and has pushed India inside Asia along more than 3,000 km after the first collision. The flow then invaded Asia all the way to the subduction trenches where it followed the retreat of the subducting lithospheres, controlling the geometry and kinematics of the major strike‐slip faults and back‐arc basins. This possible control of continental deformation by the asthenosphere flowing underneath is a different view of continental deformation and may offer a way of studying mantle flow below continents in the distant past. Key Points: Coeval India‐Asia collision and Pacific back‐arc extension explained by asthenospheric flowMantle flow correlates with long‐term kinematics from India to Pacific borderIndian mantle reaches Pacific border and Asian lithosphere spreads above ponding slabs [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]