Search

Past US FDA decisions about emergency contraception (EC) have been subject to undue political influence, and last year's barring of over-the-counter access to Plan B One-Step(®) for those under the age of 17 years is no exception. The US Department of Health and Human Services cited insufficient data on EC use for females aged 11-12 years. These youngest adolescents, however, rarely need EC: data from California (USA) show that in 2009, fewer than one in 10,000 females under the age of 13 years received EC. Maintaining barriers to safe and effective EC is not medically necessary and conflicts with national goals to decrease teenage and unintended pregnancies.

This commentary makes the case for increased investment in the development of improved contraceptive and multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) that better meet the needs and preferences of users, increase the methods' acceptability and use, and ultimately decrease unintended pregnancy. Methods that are inexpensive, user-controlled, and shelf-stable could help address challenges posed by weak supply chains and healthcare systems. New MPTs that protect against pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, could simultaneously address multiple sexual and reproductive health needs. Although promising scientific leads exist, the high costs and risks associated with contraceptive development has contributed to underinvestment. The public sector, philanthropies, and the pharmaceutical industry have decreased or eliminated investments in contraceptive research and development (R&D) in recent decades. Greater financial and policy support are required for the eventual introduction of new and improved contraceptives and MPTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. We determined whether public funding for contraception was associated with long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use when providers received training on these methods. Methods. We evaluated the impact of a clinic training intervention and public funding on LARC use in a cluster randomized trial at 40 randomly assigned clinics across the United States (2011-2013).Twenty intervention clinics received a 4-hour training. Women aged 18 to 25 were enrolled and followed for 1 year (n = 1500:802 intervention, 698 control). We estimated the effects of the intervention and funding sources on LARC initiation with Cox proportional hazards models with shared frailty. Results. Women at intervention sites had higher LARC initiation than those at control (22 vs 18 per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04, 1.98). Participants receiving care at clinics with Medicaid family planning expansion programs had almost twice the initiation rate as those at clinics without (25 vs 13 per 100 person-years; AHR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.59, 3.19). LARC initiation also increased among participants with public (AHR= 1.56; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.22) but not private health insurance. Conclusions. Public funding and provider training substantially improve LARC access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study on the use of copper intrauterine device (IUD) for emergency contraception. It presents findings that show the low level of recommendation by clinicians for the copper IUD and IUD insertions despite its high efficacy and contraceptive benefits. The study advised that patient-centered and high-quality care for emergency contraception should include a discussion of the most effective method.

The authors comment on the importance of family planning to address global health, environmental and economic problems. They argue that family planning is essential to improve the rights, health and freedom of women and their families. According to them, one of the most efficient ways of decreasing abortion rates is the use of contraceptive methods.

Abstract: Background: Placement of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) — intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the implant — directly after an abortion provides immediate contraceptive protection and has been proven safe. Study Design: We conducted a survey of National Abortion Federation member facilities (n=326; response rate 75%) to assess post-abortion contraceptive practices. Using multivariable logistic regression, we measured variations in provision of long-acting contraception by clinic factors and state contraceptive laws and policies. Results: The majority (69%) of providers surveyed offered long-acting methods, but fewer offered immediate post-abortion placement of intrauterine devices (36%) or implants (17%). Most patients were provided with contraception; 6.6% chose LARC methods offering the highest level of protection. Post-abortion provision of these methods was lower in stand-alone abortion clinics (p≤.001), but higher with recent clinician training (p≤.001) and in the absence of clinic flow barriers (p≤.001). State policies had a significant impact on how women paid for contraception and the likelihood of LARC use. Patient use was higher in states with contraceptive coverage mandates (p≤.01) or Medicaid family planning expansion programs (p≤.05). Conclusions: Use of the most effective contraceptives immediately post-abortion is rare in the United States. State policies, high cost to patients, and the ongoing need for clinician training in the methods hinder provision and patient uptake. Contraceptive policies are an important component of abortion patient access to the most effective methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article cites a study which evaluates the knowledge of technique of birth control among an urban hospital and clinic population of low socio-economic status. The study tried to examine the extant to which birth control techniques are known, whether the knowledge be adequate to allow its effective use, whether the knowledge is related to ethnicity and what are the sources of knowledge about birth control. The study found a high level of knowledge among users of birth control devices, such as condoms, diaphragm and pills, against nonusers.

Abstract: This synopsis of teens and OTC access is part of a series of briefs on emergency contraception, which address the following issues as they relate to EC: Is emergency contraception safe? Is emergency contraception effective at preventing pregnancy? Does emergency contraception promote sexual risk-taking? Is emergency contraception cost-effective? Does emergency contraception cause abortion? The full series can be found at http://crhrp.ucsf.edu. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article reports on results of a study knowledge and practice patterns of practitioners regarding intrauterine contraception. A description of the study design and methods is presented. The study concluded that prescribing practices reflected the erroneous belief that intrauterine contraceptives are appropriate only for a restricted set of women.