1. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the head and neck region using a VIBE sequence with Cartesian undersampling and compressed sensing.
- Author
-
Kubicka F, Nitschke L, Penzkofer T, Tan Q, Nickel MD, Wakonig KM, Fahlenkamp UL, Lerchbaumer M, Michallek F, Dommerich S, Hamm B, Wagner M, and Walter-Rittel T
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods, Neck diagnostic imaging, Image Enhancement methods, Aged, 80 and over, Head diagnostic imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods, Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Data Compression methods, Algorithms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Contrast Media, Head and Neck Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objectives: Compressed sensing allows for image reconstruction from sparsely sampled k-space data, which is particularly useful in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic value of a volume-interpolated 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence with variable density Cartesian undersampling and compressed sensing (CS) for head and neck MRI., Methods: Seventy-one patients with clinical indications for head and neck MRI were included in this study. DCE-MRI was performed at 3 Tesla magnet using CS-VIBE (variable density undersampling, temporal resolution 3.4 s, slice thickness 1 mm). Image quality was compared to standard Cartesian VIBE. Three experienced readers independently evaluated image quality and lesion conspicuity on a 5-point Likert scale and determined the DCE-derived time intensity curve (TIC) types., Results: CS-VIBE demonstrated higher image quality scores compared to standard VIBE with respect to overall image quality (4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, p = 0.682), vessel contour (4.6 ± 0.4 vs. 4.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), muscle contour (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.302), lesion conspicuity (4.5 ± 0.7 vs. 4.3 ± 0.9, p = 0.024) and showed improved fat saturation (4.8 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) and movement artifacts were significantly reduced (4.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Standard VIBE outperformed CS-VIBE in the delineation of pharyngeal mucosa (4.2 ± 0.5 vs. 4.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Lesion size in cases where a focal lesion was identified was similar for all readers for CS-VIBE and standard VIBE (p = 0.101). TIC curve assessment showed good interobserver agreement (k=0.717)., Conclusion: CS-VIBE with variable density Cartesian undersampling allows for DCE-MRI of the head and neck region with diagnostic, high image quality and high temporal resolution., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF