Search

Objective: To compare ease of adoption of the BostonSight Prosthetic Replacement of the Ocular Surface Ecosystem device, a custom-fit scleral lens, by patients in different age and diagnosis groups., Methods: In this prospective study, patients were categorized by age as younger than 60 or 60 years and older and by diagnosis as corneal irregularity (CI) or ocular surface disease (OSD). Ease of adoption of the scleral device was assessed by (1) number of devices and visits required to complete the fitting process, (2) time needed for device insertion and removal, (3) adaptation to the device, as assessed by daily wear time and by time needed to achieve full-time wear (defined as 8 hours per day), and (4) patients' subjective rating of ease of device insertion and removal. The length of the fitting process was also assessed., Results: There was no significant difference in the number of devices and visits needed between age group younger than 60 and age group of 60 and older or between CI and OSD groups. Patients in all groups achieved full-time wear in less than 2 weeks. Average wear time per week did not differ significantly between age or diagnosis groups. Similarly, the time needed for daily insertion and removal during the fitting period, as well as patients' subjective rating of ease of device insertion and removal, did not differ between age or diagnosis categories. The length of the fitting process was significantly longer in the OSD group compared with the CI group (P<0.001); however, factors not related to ease of adoption of the scleral device may be responsible for this difference., Conclusions: Patients in both younger and older patient groups adopted the use of a scleral device with equal ease, as did patients in the CI and OSD diagnosis groups.

Purpose: To evaluate continuous wear of a fluid-ventilated, gas-permeable scleral PROSE device using a standardized protocol as treatment for refractory persistent corneal epithelial defects in patients with severe ocular surface disease., Methods: Retrospective review of eight eyes of seven consecutive patients with persistent epithelial defects refractory to traditional therapies. The standardized treatment regimen consisted of: (1) 24-hour-a-day PROSE wear until re-epithelialization was achieved, (2) brief daily device removal, cleaning, disinfection, and reservoir fluid replacement, (3) addition of a benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic drop to the reservoir, and (4) transition to long-term, daytime PROSE wear upon re-epithelialization., Results: All eight eyes exhibited resolution of the persistent epithelial defect. No eyes developed microbial keratitis. Four eyes exhibited recurrences; all recurrences promptly responded to reinstitution of continuous wear., Conclusions: Continuous wear of a PROSE device, using a strictly standardized regimen, constitutes an effective, safe treatment option for refractory persistent epithelial defects.

PurposeTo report logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) visual outcomes of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1.DesignProspective cohort study.MethodsPreoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters of 300 eyes of 300 patients who underwent implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 device between January 2003 and July 2008 by 1 of 19 surgeons at 18 medical centers were collected.ResultsAfter an average of 17.1 ± 14.8 months, visual acuity improved significantly (P < .0001) to a mean final value of 0.89 ± 0.64 (20/150). There were also significantly fewer eyes with light perception (6.7%; n = 19; P < .0001), although 3.1% (n = 9) progressed to no light perception. There was no association between age (P = .08), sex (P = .959), operative side (P = .167), or failure (P = .494) and final visual acuity. The median time to achieve 20/200 visual acuity was 1 month (95% confidence interval 1.0-6.0) and it was retained for an average of 47.8 months. Multivariate analysis, controlling for preoperative visual acuity, demonstrated 2 factors associated with final visual outcome: chemical injury was associated with better final vision (P = .007), whereas age-related macular degeneration was associated with poorer vision (P < .0001).ConclusionsThe Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 is an effective device for rehabilitation in advanced ocular surface disease, resulting in a significant improvement in visual acuity. Eyes achieved a mean value of 20/150 (0.89 ± 0.64 logMAR units) after 6 months and this was relatively stable thereafter. The best visual prognosis is observed in chemical injury eyes, whereas the worst prognosis is in aniridia, although the latter has limited visual potential.