Search

Background: The prognostic impact of complete coronary revascularization relative to non-invasive testing methods is unknown., Objectives: To assess the association between completeness of revascularization defined by CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable angina., Methods: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients with new onset stable angina and ≥ 30% stenosis by CTA. The lesion-specific FFR CT value (two cm-distal-to-stenosis) was registered in all vessels with stenosis and considered abnormal when ≤ 0.80. Patients with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 were categorized as: Completely revascularized (CR-FFR CT ), all vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 revascularized; incompletely revascularized (IR-FFR CT ), ≥ 1 vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 non-revascularized. Early revascularization (< 90 days from index CTA) categorized vessels as revascularized. The primary endpoint comprised cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction; the secondary endpoint vessel-specific late revascularization and non-fatal myocardial infarction., Results: Amongst 900 patients and 1759 vessels, FFR CT was ≤ 0.80 in 377 (42%) patients, 536 (30%) vessels; revascularization was performed in 244 (27%) patients, 340 (19%) vessels. Risk of the primary endpoint was higher for IR-FFR CT (15/210 [7.1%]) compared to CR-FFR CT (4/167 [2.4%]), RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.01-8.8, p ​= ​0.036, and to normal FFR CT (3/523 [0.6%]), RR: 12.45; 95% CI: 3.6-42.6, p ​< ​0.001. Incidence of the secondary endpoint was higher in non-revascularized vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 (29/250 [12%]) compared to revascularized vessels with FFR CT ≤ 0.80 (5/286 [1.7%]), p ​= ​0.001, and to vessels with FFR CT > 0.80 (10/1223 [0.8%]), p ​< ​0.001., Conclusion: Incomplete revascularization of patients with lesion-specific FFR CT ≤ 0.80 is associated to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with complete revascularization or FFR CT > 0.80., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CR is a full-time employee of HeartFlow, and receives salary and stock options from HeartFlow. ELG has no conflicts related to this manuscript but has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Lundbeck Pharma, Novo Nordisk and Organon. He is investigator in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Idorsia or Bayer and has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. JL is a consultant and holds stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow. KN acknowledges support from the NIH and reports unrestricted institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers, Bayer, HeartFlow Inc and Novartis. MP has received research grants from Janssen, Bayer, Heartflow and NIH and is part of the following advisory boards: Janssen, Bayer, Heartflow, Phillips. SM is a full-time employee of HeartFlow, and shareholder of HeartFlow. TF is associated with the HeartFlow speakers bureau. All other authors had no disclosures to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)