Search

A beneficial surrogate marker for evaluating the effect of medical therapy is warranted to avoid deferred lesion revascularization. Similar to coronary artery imaging for monitoring the effects of medical therapy by analyzing plaque regression and stabilization, we hypothesized that evaluation of serial changes in the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) would serve as a surrogate marker of the effects of medical therapy against deferred lesion revascularization. Here, we investigated serial changes in QFR over time after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients who underwent medical therapy as a secondary prevention. Patients with intermediate stenosis in an untreated vessel observed at the baseline (BL) coronary angiography and follow-up (FU) coronary angiography performed 6–18 months after BL angiography were screened in 2 centers. A total of 52 patients were able to analyze both BL and FU QFR. The median QFR was 0.83 (IQR, 0.69, 0.89) at BL and 0.80 (IQR, 0.70, 0.86) at FU. The number of positive ΔQFR and negative ΔQFR were 21 and 31, respectively. The median ΔQFR was 0.05 (IQR, 0.03, 0.09) in positive ΔQFR and – 0.05 (IQR, – 0.07, – 0.03) in negative ΔQFR (p < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that LDL-C at FU predicted improvement in the QFR (OR 0.95, 95% confidence interval [0.91, 0.98], P = 0.001). Assessment of serial changes in the QFR may serve as a surrogate marker for the effects of medical therapy in patients with residual intermediate coronary stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the characteristics of coronary artery bifurcation type (parallel or perpendicular type) using three-dimensional (3D) optical coherence tomography (OCT), and determine the feasibility, reproducibility, assessment time and correlation with bifurcation angles measured by 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Methods and results: We evaluated 60 lesions at the coronary bifurcation that were treated by main vessel (MV) stenting with kissing balloon inflation (KBI) under OCT/optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance. Inter- and intra-observer agreement regarding the assessment of 3D bifurcation types were 0.88 and 0.94, respectively. The assessment times of 3D-OCT bifurcation type with OCT and OFDI were within about 30 seconds. 3D-OCT bifurcation types showed the greatest correlation with the distal bifurcation angle assessed by 3D-QCA among the three bifurcation angles (distal bifurcation angle, proximal bifurcation angle and main vessel angle), and the optimal cut-off distal bifurcation angle to predict a perpendicular type bifurcation, as determined by ROC analysis, was 51.0° (AUC 0.773, sensitivity 0.80, specificity 0.67). Based on this cut-off value for the distal bifurcation angle (51°), the diagnostic accuracy for perpendicular type bifurcation in cases with a BA ≥ 51° (n = 34) was 70.6% (24/34) and that of the parallel type bifurcation in cases of BA < 51° (n = 26) was 76.9% (20/26). Conclusion: Performing 3D-OCT for assessment of coronary artery bifurcation type is feasible and simple, and can be done in a short time with high reproducibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]