Search

Objectives: This study was designed to identify the multivariate effect of clinical risk factors on high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and 12 months major adverse events (MACE) under treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: 739 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI were recruited. On-treatment platelet aggregation was tested by light transmittance aggregometry. Clinical risk factors and MACE during one-year follow-up were recorded. An independent population of 591 patients served as validation cohort., Results: Degree of on-treatment platelet aggregation was influenced by different clinical risk factors. In multivariate regression analysis older age, diabetes mellitus, elevated BMI, renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction were independent predictors of HPR. After weighing these variables according to their estimates in multivariate regression model, we developed a score to predict HPR in stable CAD patients undergoing elective PCI (PREDICT-STABLE Score, ranging 0-9). Patients with a high score were significantly more likely to develop MACE within one year of follow-up, 3.4% (score 0-3), 6.3% (score 4-6) and 10.3% (score 7-9); odds ratio 3.23, P=0.02 for score 7-9 vs. 0-3. This association was confirmed in the validation cohort., Conclusions: Variability of on-treatment platelet function and associated outcome is mainly influenced by clinical risk variables. Identification of high risk patients (e.g. with high PREDICT-STABLE score) might help to identify risk groups that benefit from more intensified antiplatelet regimen. Additional clinical risk factor assessment rather than isolated platelet function-guided approaches should be investigated in future to evaluate personalized antiplatelet therapy in stable CAD-patients.

Objective: Monocyte infiltration is a critical step in the pathophysiology of plaque instability in coronary artery disease (CAD). Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is involved in atherosclerotic plaque progression and instability leading to intracoronary thrombosis. Gremlin-1 (Grem1) has been recently identified as endogenous inhibitor of MIF. To date there are no data on the clinical impact of this interaction in cardiovascular patients., Methods and Results: Plasma levels of MIF and Grem1 were determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS, n = 120; stable CAD, n = 166 and healthy control subjects, n = 25). MIF levels were significantly increased in ACS compared to stable CAD and healthy control (ACS: median 2.85; IQR 3.52 ng/ml; versus SAP: median 1.22; IQR 2.99 ng/ml; versus healthy control: median 0.10; IQR 0.09 ng/ml, p < 0.001). Grem1 levels were significantly higher in ACS and stable CAD patients compared to healthy control (ACS: median 211.00; IQR 130.47 ng/ml; SAP: median 220.20; IQR 120.93 ng/ml, versus healthy control: median 90.57; IQR 97.68 ng/ml, p < 0.001). Grem1/MIF ratio was independently associated with ACS, whereas the single parameters were not associated with the presence of ACS. Furthermore, Grem1/MIF ratio was associated with angiographic signs of intracoronary thrombi and severity of thrombus burden., Conclusion: These novel findings suggest a potential role of Grem1/MIF ratio to indicate acuity of CAD and the grade of plaque stability. Prospective angiographic cohort studies involving plaque imaging techniques are warranted to further characterize the prognostic role of this novel risk marker in CAD patients., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related risks are increased among patients with left main disease (LMD). The aim was to evaluate the impact of antithrombotic therapy on outcomes after LMD PCI in a predominantly ACS population., Methods and Results: One hundred and seventy-seven patients undergoing LMD PCI were identified in a pooled dataset of 14,326 patients from three large randomised trials comparing treatment with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) or bivalirudin alone, including the REPLACE-2, ACUITY and HORIZONS-AMI trials. Overall, net adverse clinical events (NACE) and non-CABG major bleedings at 30 days occurred more frequently in patients undergoing LMD PCI compared to the overall non-LMD PCI population (NACE: 19.8% vs. 10.6%, p≤0.001, major bleeding: 9.6% vs. 4.6%, p≤0.001). In the LMD group, bivalirudin was associated with significantly less non-CABG related major bleeding compared to heparin+GPI (4.5% versus 14.6%, relative risk [RR] 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09-0.83; p=0.013), while the composite ischaemic endpoint (death/MI/TVR) at 30 days was similar in the two groups (11.4% vs. 12.4%, p=0.513) resulting in a benefit on NACE for bivalirudin over heparin+GPI (14.8% vs. 24.7%; RR 0.53; p=0.039)., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing LMD PCI, the use of bivalirudin instead of heparin+GPI resulted in significantly less major bleeding and improved short-term net clinical outcome. Bivalirudin may be the preferred anticoagulation strategy in LMD PCI patients.

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of the treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Dual therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is currently the standard treatment after percutaneous coronary interventions. However, despite the use of clopidogrel, a considerable number of patients continue to suffer major adverse cardiac events. There is a growing degree of evidence supporting high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) as a predictive factor for recurrent ischemic complications. Numerous studies have shown an interindividual variability of responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin, which is one of the reasons for HPR. There is yet to be established an assay for antiplatelet drug response as the gold standard. This paper provides a background to the current controversies surrounding the issue of testing for the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy and reviews the various genetic and phenotype-based laboratory tests to measure aspirin and clopidogrel response and their correlation with clinical outcomes. On the basis of the current evidence and trying to be cost-effective, testing should be considered on a case-by-case basis, especially in patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome or stent thrombosis. In the case of stable CAD, we think that testing might be helpful in particular risk groups of patients to avoid ischemic or bleeding complications.

Background . Functional recovery and prognosis after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are mainly driven by the extent of reperfusion injury and myocardial repair mechanisms. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) is critically involved in cardiac injury, repair and remodeling. In this study, we investigated the prognostic role of platelet TGF-β1 surface expression and circulating TGF-β1 levels in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results . Expression of TGF-β1 in platelets and circulating TGF-β1 levels were investigated by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively, among patients with ACS and stable CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In a cohort study, platelet and circulating TGF-β1 was measured in 299 patients with symptomatic CAD (stable CAD = 145, ACS = 154) at the time of PCI. The primary combined endpoint was defined as death and/or STEMI during 12-month follow-up. Platelets expressed TGF-β1 and circulating TGF-β1 showed a weak, but significant negative correlation. TGF-β1 surface expression was significantly elevated on platelets in ACS patients compared to patients with stable CAD (median MFI 13.4 vs. median MFI 11.7, p = 0.003). During follow-up, lower platelet expression of TGF-β1 was associated with all-cause mortality (median MFI 11.0 vs. median MFI 13.9, p = 0.011) as well as for the combined endpoint of death and/or STEMI, (median MFI 10.8 vs. median MFI 13.9, p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis platelet TGF-β1 expression was independently associated with the combined primary endpoint in the overall cohort (Hazard Ratio 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval 0.11–0.89, p = 0.029) and was strongly associated with prognosis in ACS patients. There was no significant association of circulating TGF-β1 levels neither with the presence of ACS nor the occurrence of the primary endpoint. Conclusion . These findings highlight a potential role of platelet expressed TGF-β1 in ACS and indicate a prognostic value of TGF-β1 on clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Large scale studies are warranted to further evaluate the regulatory mechanisms of platelet TGF-β1 expression- and its prognostic impact in CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]