Search

A retrospective analysis was performed in patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA) with the single-source 64-slice CT (SSCT), dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT), dual-source 128-slice CT and 320-slice CT with the aim of comparing the radiation dose associated with different CT generations. A total of 164 patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered CCTA with different types of CT scanners were studied with the mean effective doses estimated at 6.8 ± 3.2, 4.2 ± 1.9, 4.1±0.6 and 3.8 ± 1.4 mSv corresponding to the 128-slice DSCT, 64-slice DSCT, 64-slice SSCT and 320-slice CT scanners. In this study a positive relationship was found between the effective dose and the body mass index (BMI). A low radiation dose is achieved in prospective ECG-triggered CCTA, regardless of the CT scanner generation. BMI is identified as the major factor that has a direct impact on the effective dose associated with prospective ECG-triggered CCTA.

Objective: Cardiac CT allows the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Electron-beam CT (EBCT) has been widely replaced by high-end CT generations in the assessment of CAC. The aim of this study was to compare the CAC scores derived from an EBCT with those from a dual-source CT (DSCT)., Methods: We retrospectively selected 92 patients (61 males; mean age, 60.7 ± 12 years) from our database, who underwent both EBCT and DSCT. CAC was assessed using the Agatston score by two independent readers (replicates: 1, 2; 3=mean of reading 1 and 2)., Results: EBCT scores were on average slightly higher than DSCT scores (281 ± 569 vs 241 ± 502; p<0.05). In regression analysis R(2)-values vary from 0.956 (1) to 0.966 (3). We calculated a correction factor as EBCT=(DSCT+1)(1.026)-1. When stratifying into CAC categories (0, 1-99, 100-399, 400-999 and ≥1000), 79 (86%) were correctly classified. From those with positive CAC scores, 7 out of 61 cases (11%, κ=0.81) were classified in different categories. Using the corrected DSCT CAC score, linear regression analysis for the comparison to the EBCT results were r=0.971 (p<0.001), with a mean difference of 6.4 ± 147.8. Five subjects (5.4%) were still classified in different categories (κ=0.84)., Conclusion: CAC obtained from DSCT is highly correlated with the EBCT measures. Using the calculated correction factor, agreement only marginally improved the clinical interpretation of results. Overall, for clinical purposes, face value use of DSCT-derived values appears as useful as EBCT for CAC scoring.

The accuracy of coronary calcium scoring using 16-row MSCT comparing 1- and 3-mm slices was assessed. A thorax phantom with calcium cylinder inserts was scanned applying a non-enhanced retrospectively ECG-gated examination protocol: collimation 12 x 0.75 mm; 120 kV; 133 mAs(eff). Thirty-eight patients were examined using the same scan protocol. Image reconstruction was performed with an effective slice thickness of 3 and 1 mm. The volume score, calcium mass and Agatston score were determined. Image noise was measured in both studies. The volume score and calcium mass varied less than the Agatston score. The overall measured calcium mass compared to the actual calcium mass revealed a relative difference of +2.0% for 1-mm slices and -1.2% for 3-mm slices. Due to increased image noise in thinner slices in the patient study (26.1 HU), overall calcium scoring with a scoring threshold of 130 HU was not feasible. Interlesion comparison showed significantly higher scoring results for thinner slices (all P<0.001). A similar accuracy comparing calcium scoring results of 1- and 3-mm slices was shown in the phantom study; therefore, the potentially necessary increase of the patient's dose in order to achieve assessable 1-mm slices with an acceptable image-to-noise-ratio appears not to be justified.