Search

Background: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been recognized as an essential component of the treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). Determining the efficacy of modern alternative treatment methods is the key to developing exercise-based CR programs., Methods: Studies published through June 6, 2016, were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. English-language articles regarding the efficacy of different modes of CR in patients with CHD were included in this analysis. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data from the studies. According to the categories described by prior Cochrane reviews, exercise-based CR was classified into center-based CR, home-based CR, tele-based CR, and combined CR for this analysis. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent fatal and/or nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent cardiac artery bypass grafting, recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and hospital readmissions., Results: Sixty randomized clinical trials (n = 19,411) were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) demonstrated that only center-based CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality (center-based: RR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.90], p = 0.002) compared to usual care. Other modes of CR were not significantly different from usual care with regard to their ability to reduce mortality. Treatment ranking indicated that combined CR exhibited the highest probability (86.9%) of being the most effective mode, but this finding was not statistically significant due to the small sample size (combined: RR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.20-1.27], p = 0.146)., Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that center-based CR is acceptable for patients with CHD. As home- and tele-based CR can save time, money, effort, and resources and may be preferred by patients, their efficacy should be investigated further in subsequent studies.

Background: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been recognized as an essential component of the treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). Determining the efficacy of modern alternative treatment methods is the key to developing exercise-based CR programs.Methods: Studies published through June 6, 2016, were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. English-language articles regarding the efficacy of different modes of CR in patients with CHD were included in this analysis. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data from the studies. According to the categories described by prior Cochrane reviews, exercise-based CR was classified into center-based CR, home-based CR, tele-based CR, and combined CR for this analysis. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent fatal and/or nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent cardiac artery bypass grafting, recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and hospital readmissions.Results: Sixty randomized clinical trials (n = 19,411) were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) demonstrated that only center-based CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality (center-based: RR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.90], p = 0.002) compared to usual care. Other modes of CR were not significantly different from usual care with regard to their ability to reduce mortality. Treatment ranking indicated that combined CR exhibited the highest probability (86.9%) of being the most effective mode, but this finding was not statistically significant due to the small sample size (combined: RR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.20-1.27], p = 0.146).Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that center-based CR is acceptable for patients with CHD. As home- and tele-based CR can save time, money, effort, and resources and may be preferred by patients, their efficacy should be investigated further in subsequent studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently complicated with more cardiovascular risk factors, but received fewer evidence-based medications (EBMs). This study explored the association of EBMs compliance in different age groups and the risk of long-term death.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from a single registered database. 2830 consecutive patients with CAD were enrolled and grouped into 3 categories by age. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and secondary endpoint is cardiovascular mortality.Results: The mean follow-up time was 30.25 ± 11.89 months and death occurred in 270 cases,including 150 cases of cardiac death. Cumulative survival curves indicated that the incidence rates of all-cause death and cardiovascular death increased with age (older than 75 years old vs. 60 to 75 years old vs. younger than 60 years old, mortality: 18.7% vs. 9.6% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001; cardiovascular mortality: 10.3% vs. 5.1% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001). The percentage of elderly patients using no EBMs was significantly higher than the percentages in the other age group (7.7% vs. 4.6% vs. 2.2%,p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed the benefit of combination EBMs (all-cause mortality: hazard ratio [HR] 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.27; cardiac mortality: HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.19) for older CAD patients. Similar trends were found about different kinds of EBMs in elderly patients.Conclusions: Elderly patients with CAD had higher risk of death but a lower degree of compliance with EBMs usage. Elderly CAD patients could receive more clinical benefits by using EBMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A new 4-tired classification of left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH) based on LV concentricity and dilation has been proposed; however, the association between the new categorization of LV geometry and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease ( CAD) is still unknown. Methods All the 2297 patients with CAD included underwent echocardiographic examination prior to discharge. Left ventricular mass ( LVM) was calculated, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume ( EDV) was indexed by body surface area ( BSA). Study cohort was divided into five groups according to LV geometry: (i) eccentric nondilated LVH (normal LVM/ EDV(2/3) and EDV/ BSA) ( n = 129); (ii) eccentric dilated LVH (normal LVM/ EDV(2/3) with increased EDV/ BSA) ( n = 222); (iii) concentric nondilated LVH (increased LVM/ EDV(2/3) with normal EDV/ BSA) ( n = 441); (iv) concentric dilated LVH (increased LVM/ EDV(2/3) and EDV/ BSA) ( n = 118); and (v) normal LV mass ( n = 1387). Results Dilated LVH was associated with a higher event rates of all-cause death (eccentric 13·1% vs. 3·1%; concentric 13·6% vs. 8·4%) and composite events (eccentric: 17·6% vs. 5·4%; concentric: 18·6% vs. 12·7%) compared with nondilated LVH. While eccentric nondilated LVH had comparable risk for adverse outcomes compared with normal LV mass (all-cause death: relative risk ( RR) 0·68, 95% confidential interval ( CI) 0·25-1·85; composite events: RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·36-1·58). Cox regression analyses showed that eccentric dilated LVH had the highest propensity to all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [ aHR] 2·752 [95% CI 1·749-4·328], P < 0·001) and composite events ( aHR 2·462 [95% CI 1·688-3·592], P < 0·001). Conclusion In patients with CAD, dilated LVH and nondilated LVH provide distinct prognostic information. Eccentric nondilated LVH does not predict adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous reports of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft outcomes in coronary artery disease patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were inconsistent. We evaluated the optimal revascularization strategy for CKD patients. We searched Pub Med, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and scanned the references of relevant articles and reviews. All studies that compared relevant clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft in CKD patients were selected. We defined short-term and long-term all-cause mortality as primary outcome, and long-term incidences of myocardial infarction and revascularization as secondary outcomes. A total of 2235 citations were retrieved, and 31 studies involving 99,054 patients, with 55,383 receiving percutaneous coronary intervention and 43,671 receiving coronary artery bypass graft, were included. In subgroup analyses of dialysis patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention with stents versus coronary artery bypass graft, CKD patients with multivessel coronary disease, and CKD patients receiving drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass graft, the pooled outcomes revealed that percutaneous coronary intervention possessed lower short-term mortality, but higher late revascularization risk. No significant differences in long-term mortality were observed between the two strategies in these subgroup analyses. In conclusion, in some specific clinical circumstances, CKD patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention possessed lower short-term all-cause mortality, but higher long-term revascularization risk, than coronary artery bypass graft; long-term all-cause mortality was not different between the two strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ageing is a risk factor for both coronary artery disease (CAD) and reduced renal function (RRF), and it is also associated with poor prognosis in patients with CAD or RRF. However, little is known about whether the impact of RRF on clinical outcomes are different in CAD patients at different age groups. This study aimed to investigate whether ageing influences the effect of RRF on long-term risk of death in patients with CAD.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a single-center cohort study. Three thousand and two consecutive patients with CAD confirmed by coronary angiography were enrolled. RRF was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min. The primary endpoint in this study was all-cause mortality.Results: The mean follow-up time was 29.1 ± 12.5 months and death events occurred in 275 cases (all-cause mortality: 9.2%). The correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between eGFR and age (r = - 0.386, P < 0.001). Comparing the younger group (age ≤ 59) with the elderly one (age ≥ 70), the prevalence of RRF increased from 5.9 to 27.5%. Multivariable Cox regression revealed that RRF was independently associated with all-cause mortality in all age groups, and the relative risks in older patients were lower than those in younger ones (age ≤ 59 vs. age 60-69 vs. age ≥ 70: hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.37 vs. HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.17-3.42 vs. HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06-2.02). There was a significant trend for HRs for all-cause mortality according to the interaction terms for RRF and age group (RRF*age [≤59] vs. RRF*age [60-69] vs. RRF*age [≥70]: HR 1.00[reference] vs. HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.23-1.54 vs. HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.75; P for trend = 0.010).Conclusions: RRF may have different impacts on clinical outcomes in CAD patients at different age groups. The association of RRF with the risk of all-cause mortality was attenuated with ageing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of triglyceride (TG) in secondary prevention of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) was debated. In the present study, we assessed the association between admission TG levels and long-term mortality risk in CAD patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from a single registered database. 3061 consecutive patients with CAD confirmed by coronary angiography were enrolled and were grouped into 3 categories by the tertiles of admission serum TG levels. The primary end point in this study was all-cause mortality and the secondary end point was cardiovascular mortality. Results: The mean follow-up time was 26.9 ± 13.6 months and death events occurred in 258 cases and cardiovascular death events occurred in 146 cases. Cumulative survival curves indicated that the risk of all-cause death decreased with increasing TG level (Tertile 1 vs. Tertile 2 vs. Tertile 3 = 10.3% vs. 8.6% vs. 6.3%, log rank test for overall p = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed an independent correlation between TG level and risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–0.86] and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.89) in total patients with CAD. Subgroup analysis found the similar results in patients with acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions: This study found an inverse association between TG levels and mortality risk in CAD patients, which suggests that the "TG paradox" may exist in CAD patients. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR-OOC-17010433. Registered 17 February 2017 - Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is a controversy surrounding the correlation between fibrinogen (Fib) level and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We try to investigate the role of the subtypes of CAD in this controversy. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted from a single center CAD registered database. 3020 consecutive patients with CAD confirmed by coronary angiography were enrolled. The end points were all-cause mortality. Results The mean follow-up time was 27.2 ± 13.1 months and death events occurred in 258 cases. Mortality rates for patients with CAD and those in the stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) groups exhibited an overall rising trend as Fib levels increased (log rank test, all p < 0.05). However, similar trends were not detected in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The results of a Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis showed that Fib level was independently correlated with the risk of death in patients with CAD as well as those in the SCAD and UAP groups (CAD, HR 1.40, CI 1.16–1.68; SCAD, HR 1.86, CI 1.24–2.79; UAP, HR 1.42, CI 1.06–1.90). In the AMI group, however, no independent correlation was observed between Fib level and mortality. Conclusion The different proportions of subtypes of CAD affected the correlation between Fib level and the clinical prognosis of patients with CAD. This is maybe a clue to explain the controversy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Despite strong evidence linking decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to worse cardiovascular outcome, the impact of eGFR on mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with different left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is not well defined. Methods A retrospective cohort study. From Jul. 2008 to Jan. 2012, consecutive patients with CAD of West China Hospital were enrolled and were grouped into 3 eGFR categories: ≥ 90, 60–90, and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Patients with EF ≥ 50% or < 50% were defined as preserved EF or reduced EF, respectively. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Results There are 2161 patients according to the inclusion criteria and follow-up requirement. The mean follow-up time was 30.97 ± 11.70 months. Cumulative survival curves showed that in patients with reduced EF, renal insufficiency significantly increases all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in a graded fashion (mortality rate, moderate or severe vs. normal: 29.3% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001; cardiac mortality rate, moderate or severe vs. normal: 18.2% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that in CAD patients with reduced EF, moderate to severe renal insufficiency increased all-cause mortality by 6.10-fold (HR 6.10, 95% CI 2.50 to 14.87) and cardiac mortality by 4.10-fold (HR 4.10, 95% CI 1.51 to 11.13). Use of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and statins was associated with decreased risk of mortality, but the use was lower in renal insufficiency patients, especially in combination of reduced EF. Conclusion This study has found that the effect of renal function on prognosis in patients with CAD is closely related to cardiac function. In patients with reduced EF, renal insufficiency accompanies the higher risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. A higher number of treatments from beta-blocker, ACEIs or ARBs, and statin therapy were associated with decreased risk of mortality, even in the combination of renal insufficiency or declining cardiac function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 plays a key role in clopidogrel activation and thus impacts the clinical outcome of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the majority of patients with CAD gradually discontinue clopidogrel after one year of discharge. This study explored whether the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism was associated with clinical events in patients with CAD after one year of discharge. Method: Between July 2008 and July 2009, 506 patients with CAD that was confirmed by coronary angiography were enrolled in this study, and their CYP2C19 genotype was determined. The primary endpoint events included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke. The secondary endpoint events included the components of the primary endpoint events, all-cause mortality and recurrent revascularisation. Result: The baseline clinical characteristics of CYP2C19*2-mutation carriers (homozygous *2/*2, n = 49; heterozygous *1/*2, n = 222) and non-carriers (wild-type allele *1/*1, n = 235) were comparable. The follow-up results showed that the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events within one year of discharge was significantly higher in carriers of the CYP2C19*2 homozygous genotype (*2/*2) than non-carriers (12.24% vs. 3.83%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 4.651, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.566–13.814, p = 0.006). However, the follow-up results after one year of discharge showed that the risk of the CYP2C19*2 homozygous genotype were significantly reduced. New primary endpoint events during the second year after discharge had no significant correlation with the CYP2C19 genotype. Conclusion: The risk of cardiovascular events in CAD patients with a homozygous CYP2C19*2 mutation was significantly higher than in other patients within the first year after discharge. However, the adverse impact of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was significantly reduced after one year of discharge. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C19 is expressed in vascular endothelium and metabolizes arachidonic acid to biologically active epoxyeicosatrienoic acids, which play a key role in regulating vascular tone. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the genetic functional variant 681G>A (*2) of cytochrome CYP2C19 is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Between July 2008 and September 2009, 654 consecutive patients with CAD were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent CYP2C19 genotyping. The primary study endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included the components of the primary endpoint, death from any cause, and recurrent revascularization. Results: The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between carriers (heterozygous *1/*2, n =291; homozygous *2/*2, n =57) and non-carriers (n =306) of the CYP2C19*2 variant. During the follow-up period (11.42±4.23 months), the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in homozygous *2/*2 than in non-carriers (n =306) of CYP2C19*2 variant (12.28% versus 3.27%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=5.191; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.936–13.917; P =0.001); however, no such increase was evident in heterozygous *1/*2 patients (4.12% versus 3.27%; adjusted HR=1.208; 95% CI 0.517–2.822; P =0.662). Conclusions: The homozygous CYP2C19*2/*2 genotype is an independent determinant of adverse vascular events in Chinese patients with CAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]