Search

Copyright of Conservation Biology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract: A newly developed indicator of the pesticide risk for aquatic biocenosis in surface water bodies is applied within an economic sector model, and is used to evaluate alternative designs for an environmental policy programme. For rural districts (‘Landkreise’) across Germany, different widths of riparian buffer zones adjacent to surface water bodies are evaluated in terms of efficient cost/risk ratios. The indicator is defined as acute risk under worst-case input conditions and is based on combining a sectoral model, a national survey on pesticide use and a toxicological risk assessment model. The nation-wide survey provides data on pesticide use by agricultural crop. On this basis, crop-specific risk indices for aquatic biocenosis are calculated by means of eco-toxic criteria for indicator organisms and aggregated through crop patterns to the rural-district level. GIS is used to calculate the influences of natural site factors (e.g. soil types, land use distance to water bodies, etc.) on pesticide input in surface water and to calculate the regional risk potentials at regional level. An economic cost–impact analysis is conducted based on the new indicator. Opportunity costs of converting agricultural land to riparian buffer strips are estimated using the agricultural sector model RAUMIS, for buffer strip widths of 3, 30 and 50m, as per the European the environmental programme EC 99/1257/EEC. These costs are then compared with estimated risk reduction potentials at the regional level of administrative districts. Results show that cost–impact ratios are most efficient for 3m buffer strips and in those regions with the lowest costs from changing agricultural land use (e.g. through reduced livestock production). A major future research need in this area is a higher spatial resolution at the grid-level. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

If Noah had had the opportunity to select the animals he took on board his Ark, he would have had to choose between many species, breeds and types within breeds, all containing different genetic material. How could he have made the right choice and which would he have taken on board given the constraints he had to face? Those trying to save threatened livestock breeds within a tight conservation budget face similar questions. In this paper we assess how different types of Borana cattle, a culturally significant breed in East Africa, might be prioritized for conservation. By applying a cost-effectiveness analysis on the basis of Weizmann's approach we conclude that the highest priority should be given to the Ethiopian Borana type (EB) in Ethiopia. Noah, however, would also have been concerned about the problems of inbreeding and effective population size. To overcome this problem we suggest that, rather than loading just two animals, he should have loaded on board 1000 female and 100 male animals as a safe minimum. The minimum cost of conserving 1100 animals of the EB type with the participation of Ethiopian communities is calculated to be €7700 per year, mostly in the form of compensation payments to meet the opportunity costs of livestock-keepers that arise when maintaining the EB. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]