1. COVID-19 Death Determination Methods, Minnesota, USA, 2020-2022 1 .
- Author
-
Fess LJ, Fell A, O'Toole S, D'Heilly P, Holzbauer S, Kollmann L, Markelz A, Morris K, Ruhland A, Seys S, Schiffman E, Wienkes H, Zirnhelt Z, Meyer S, and Como-Sabetti K
- Subjects
- Humans, Minnesota epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Adult, Aged, Child, Adolescent, Child, Preschool, Young Adult, Infant, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Autopsy, COVID-19 Testing methods, COVID-19 mortality, COVID-19 epidemiology, Death Certificates, SARS-CoV-2
- Abstract
Accurate and timely mortality surveillance is crucial for elucidating risk factors, particularly for emerging diseases. We compared use of COVID-19 keywords on death certificates alone to identify COVID-19 deaths in Minnesota, USA, during 2020-2022, with use of a standardized mortality definition incorporating additional clinical data. For analyses, we used likelihood ratio χ
2 and median 1-way tests. Death certificates alone identified 96% of COVID-19 deaths confirmed by the standardized definition and an additional 3% of deaths that had been classified as non-COVID-19 deaths by the standardized definition. Agreement between methods was >90% for most groups except children, although agreement among adults varied by demographics and location at death. Overall median time from death to filing of death certificate was 3 days; decedent characteristics and whether autopsy was performed varied. Death certificates are an efficient and timely source of COVID-19 mortality data when paired with SARS-CoV-2 testing data.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF