Search

Determining the quantity of active virus is the most important basis to judge the risk of virus infection, which usually relies on the virus median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 ) assay performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory within 5-7 days. We have developed a culture-free method for rapid and accurate quantification of active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by targeting subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) based on reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR). The dynamic range of quantitative assays for sgRNA-N and sgRNA-E by RT-dPCR was investigated, and the result showed that the limits of detection (LoD) and quantification (LoQ) were 2 copies/reaction and 10 copies/reaction, respectively. The delta strain (NMDC60042793) of SARS-CoV-2 was cultured at an average titer of 10 6.13 TCID 50 /mL and used to evaluate the developed quantification method. Copy number concentrations of the cultured SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA and genomic RNA (gRNA) gave excellent linearity (R 2 = 0.9999) with SARS-CoV-2 titers in the range from 500 to 10 5 TCID 50 /mL. Validation of 63 positive clinical samples further proves that the quantification of sgRNA-N by RT-dPCR is more sensitive for active virus quantitative detection. It is notable that we can infer the active virus titer through quantification of SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA based on the linear relationship in a biosafety level 2 laboratory within 3 h. It can be used to timely and effectively identify infectious patients and reduce unnecessary isolation especially when a large number of COVID-19 infected people impose a burden on medical resources., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

More than forty antigen testing kits have been approved to response the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and its variant strains. However, the approved antigen testing kits are not capable of quantitative detection. Here, we successfully developed a lateral flow immunoassay based on colloidal gold nanoparticles (CGNP-based LFIA) for nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2 quantitative detection. Delta strain (NMDC60042793) of SARS-CoV-2 have been cultured and analyzed by our developed digital PCR and LFIA methods to explore the relationship between N protein amount and N gene level. It indicated that the linear relationship (y = 47 ×) between N protein molecule number and N gene copy number exhibited very well (R 2  = 0.995), the virus titers and N protein amount can be roughly estimated according to nucleic acid testing. Additionally, detection limits (LODs) of nine approved antigen testing kits also have been evaluated according to the Guidelines for the registration review of 2019-nCoV antigen testing reagents. Only three antigen testing kits had LODs as stated in the instructions, the LODs of Kits have been converted into the N gene and N protein levels, according to the established relationships among virus titer vers. N gene and antigen. Results demonstrated that the sensitivity of nucleic acid testing is at least 1835 times higher than that of antigen testing. We expect that the relationship investigation and testing kits evaluation have the important directive significance to precise epidemic prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 505 million confirmed cases, including over 6 million deaths. Reference materials (RMs) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA played a crucial role in performance evaluation and quality control of testing laboratories. As the potential primary characterization method of RMs, reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) measures the copy number of RNA, but the accuracy of reverse transcription (RT) efficiency has yet to be confirmed. This study established a method of enzymatic digestion followed by isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS), which does not require an RT reaction, to quantify in vitro-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA. RNA was digested to nucleotide monophosphate (NMP) within 15 min and analyzed by IDMS within 5 min. The consistency among the results of four different NMPs demonstrated the reliability of the proposed method. Compared to IDMS, the quantitative result of RT-dPCR turned out to be about 10% lower, possibly attributed to the incompleteness of the reverse transcription process. Therefore, the proposed approach could be valuable and reliable for quantifying RNA molecules and evaluating the RT efficiency of RT-based methods., (© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The outbreak of COVID-19 caused by a novel Coronavirus (termed SARS-CoV-2) has spread to over 210 countries around the world. Currently, reverse transcription quantitative qPCR (RT-qPCR) is used as the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. However, the sensitivity of RT-qPCR assays of pharyngeal swab samples are reported to vary from 30% to 60%. More accurate and sensitive methods are urgently needed to support the quality assurance of the RT-qPCR or as an alternative diagnostic approach. A reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) method was established and evaluated. To explore the feasibility of RT-dPCR in diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2, a total of 196 clinical pharyngeal swab samples from 103 suspected patients, 77 close contacts and 16 supposed convalescents were analyzed by RT-qPCR and then measured by the proposed RT-dPCR. For the 103 fever suspected patients, 19 (19/25) negative and 42 (42/49) equivocal tested by RT-qPCR were positive according to RT-dPCR. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection was significantly improved from 28.2% by RT-qPCR to 87.4% by RT-dPCR. For 29 close contacts (confirmed by additional sample and clinical follow up), 16 (16/17) equivocal and 1 negative tested by RT-qPCR were positive according to RT-dPCR, which is implying that the RT-qPCR is missing a lot of asymptomatic patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of RT-dPCR were 91%, 100% and 93%, respectively. RT-dPCR is highly accurate method and suitable for detection of pharyngeal swab samples from COVID-19 suspected patients and patients under isolation and observation who may not be exhibiting clinical symptoms., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The pandemic of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused severe harm to the health of people all around the world. Molecular detection of the pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), played a crucial role in the control of the disease. Reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) has been developed and used in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA as an absolute quantification method. Here, an interlaboratory assessment of quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was organized by the National Institute of Metrology, China (NIMC), using in vitro transcribed RNA samples, among ten laboratories on six different dPCR platforms. Copy number concentrations of three genes of SARS-CoV-2 were measured by all participants. Consistent results were obtained with dispersion within 2.2-fold and CV% below 23% among different dPCR platforms and laboratories, and Z′ scores of all the reported results being satisfactory. Possible reasons for the dispersion included PCR assays, partition volume, and reverse transcription conditions. This study demonstrated the comparability and applicability of RT-dPCR method for quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and showed the capability of the participating laboratories at SARS-CoV-2 test by RT-dPCR platform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]