Search

Purpose: The accuracy of level of anti- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies is a great concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection kits from two manufacturers in evaluating the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines., Methods: The immune responses and consistency of four anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were evaluated using two manufacturers' antibody kits (A and B) in 61 subjects within 160 days after vaccination with the CoronaVac vaccine., Results: The total seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibodies and IgM antibodies detected by kit A were higher than those detected by kit B (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conversely, the total seropositivity rates of total antibodies and IgG antibodies were higher in kit B than kit A (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The consistency rates showed less than 90% agreement between the kits for the detection of the four antibodies, and the κ score showed moderate or substantial consistency. The half-lives of neutralizing antibodies, total antibodies, and IgG antibodies within 160 days after vaccination, detected by kit A were 63.88 days, 80.50 days, and 63.70 days, respectively and by kit B were 97.06 days, 65.41 days, and 77.99 days, respectively., Conclusion: The efficacy of antibody detection differed between the two commercial anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody kits, although there was moderate consistency, which may affect the clinical application and formulation of the vaccine strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Context.—: Neutralizing antibody detection can assess the incidence of COVID-19 and the effectiveness of vaccines. However, commercial reagents for neutralizing antibodies were developed after the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM antibodies. Therefore, some laboratories did not perform neutralizing antibody testing services because of multiple factors., Objective.—: To find a fast, accurate, and economic alternative for the detection of neutralizing antibodies for the development of COVID-19 screening programs., Design.—: The response and correlation of 3 antibodies (anti-spike protein neutralizing antibody, total anti-receptor-binding domain [RBD] antibody, and anti-RBD IgG) were determined by observing the dynamics in 61 participants for 160 days after vaccination., Results.—: The levels of neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibodies reached their peak values on day 42 after vaccination (120.75 IU/mL and 14.38 signal-to-cutoff ratio [S/CO], respectively). The total antibody levels peaked at 138.47 S/CO on day 35 after vaccination. The strongest correlation was found between neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibody levels (r = 0.894, P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for total antibody levels for the prediction of seropositivity for neutralizing antibodies was 0.881 (P < .001), and that for anti-RBD IgG antibody levels was 0.937 (P < .001)., Conclusions.—: Neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibody levels were strongly correlated, and thus anti-RBD IgG antibody levels can be used for the accurate assessment of immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.

Background: Determining what quarantine period and detection strategy are more effective and sustainable remains a challenge for further prevention and social stability., Methods: From October 2020 to December 2021, 290,547 inbound overseas travelers were subject to government quarantine in Xiamen, China. The detection rate of COVID-19 during different quarantine periods using dual or single nucleic acid testing reagents., Results: The COVID-19 positive rate was 1.79% (519/290,547). The detection rates during the 7-day, 14-day and 14+7-day quarantine periods using the dual reagents were 78.4%, 91.7%, and 100%, respectively. The detection rate of the 7-day, 14-day and 14+7-day quarantine periods were 73.99%, 86.51%, and 94.22%, respectively, using the Liferiver reagent and 72.25%, 84.59%, and 91.91%, respectively, using the Daan reagent. Based on the 14+7 day strategy, dual nucleic acid testing reagent strategy detected all imported cases, but 30 cases (5.78%) were not detected via Liferiver reagent and 42 (8.09%) cases not detected via Daan reagent., Conclusion: A 14+7-day quarantine period and dual nucleic acid testing reagent strategy are effective screening methods for COVID-19 among inbound overseas travelers. The superior detection rate of these strategies reduce the risk of secondary transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)