Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 was first described in December 2019, in China. In addition, there has also been an increase in arboviral infections in recent years. As both infections have similar symptoms, misdiagnosis may occur if both outbreaks occur at the same time., Objective: Our objective was to assess the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on diagnostic assays used for arboviral diseases., Materials and Methods: We conducted this study by testing samples obtained during the precovid phase (before November 2019) and during the covid period (after February 2020). Samples were further grouped as those with acute febrile illness (AFI) and those without. All samples were tested for anti SARS-CoV-2 Ab, Chikungunya and Dengue specific IgM antibodies to evaluate potential serological cross-reactions between COVID-19 and Arbovirus specific antibodies., Results: One sample from the 62 cases of AFI during the pre-covid phase showed seropositivity for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Also, in asymptomatic individuals, arboviral seropositivity was significantly higher in the COVID period samples (22%) compared to pre-COVID samples (3%)., Conclusion: Due to similar clinical symptoms and cross reactions in both infections, relying solely on serological testing for arboviral diagnosis may be less sensitive; other clinical and laboratory parameters may be required., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, pooled testing of samples by RT-PCR has been recommended at certain scenarios to increase labs' testing capacity and reduce cost of testing. This paper describes the evaluation of bi-directional matrix pooling strategies with clinical samples in a 5 × 5 and 10 × 10 matrix. Nasopharyngeal swab samples in viral transport medium (VTM) previously tested (positive or negative) by real time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 were used for these experiments. Ten sets of 5 × 5 (250 samples) and ten sets of 10 × 10 (1000 samples) pooling of samples in both directions was done with known positive samples introduced at random positions. Extracted nucleic acid was tested for SARS-CoV-2 E-gene by RT-PCR. Sensitivity or concordance and feasibility of matrix pooling were assessed in comparison to direct RT-PCR testing. In comparison to direct testing, the overall concordance was 86.6% for 5 × 5 pooling, 73.3% for 10 × 10 with 200 µL extraction volume and 86.6% for 10 × 10 with 400 µL extraction volume. Bi-directional matrix pooling can be adopted with advantage over conventional direct or pool testing for COVID-19 by RT-PCR under the following conditions: i) sample positivity rate of ≤ 5%, ii) matrix pool size of 8-10 samples, iii) use of min. 40 µL VTM from each sample and iv) utilization of automated liquid handling equipment, if available, for sample addition to avoid human errors., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)